Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝑶𝒓𝒆𝒍𝒍𝒊𝒆

@Orellliecos

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

136subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002286717589
TypeChannel
Username@Orellliecos
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Orellliecos

Growth

1369 Aug 2026, 04:48 — 136 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 21:11 — 136 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 04:489 Aug 2026, 21:11
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 135–137 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 21:11136no change
9 Aug 2026, 04:48136first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 6 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
132.5%
avg views ÷ 136 subscribers
Avg views / post
180
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held15 (6 July 202627 July 2026)
Views total1,081
Reactions total130
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 04:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

174 reactions across 12 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 51995536884729465282916.7%
custom 51999397544932480731910.9%
custom 5197538219234724926158.62%
custom 5199566491770454139158.62%
custom 5411076936560556048148.05%
custom 5253523972636555518126.90%
custom 5411573207146708862116.32%
custom 5471977902075558775105.75%
custom 522431047267255650474.02%
custom 541152315789280700774.02%
custom 527194023405606308363.45%
custom 530764720488057463063.45%
custom 540438733172351783763.45%
custom 519943383741055136952.87%
custom 519985637629313148242.30%
custom 519946837753754779921.15%
custom 519983676117749284310.575%
custom 526252736225530765510.575%
custom 526732534323611811810.575%
custom 530761256167436493010.575%
2 further kinds21.15%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 174reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 16:14 UTC79 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟

custom 519955368847294652810custom 51975382192347249266custom 51995664917704541395custom 51994338374105513692custom 51998563762931314822custom 51994683775375477991custom 51999397544932480731

Signed ⋆ 𝓞𝓡𝓔𝓞

26 Jul 2026, 17:59 UTC84 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Начала дня было ,конечно, не супер, но зато я очень хорошо провела время на фестивале🌟

custom 51995536884729465289custom 51995664917704541392custom 51999397544932480732custom 51994338374105513691

Signed ⋆ 𝓞𝓡𝓔𝓞

24 Jul 2026, 20:00 UTC446 views37 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 519993975449324807315custom 519955368847294652810custom 51995664917704541397custom 51994338374105513692custom 51975382192347249261custom 51994683775375477991custom 51998367611774928431

Signed ⋆ 𝓞𝓡𝓔𝓞

24 Jul 2026, 09:35 UTC97 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

У меня стало побольше свободного времени и я постараюсь выкладывать контент чаще. Сегодня пост в Ванилле 🌟🌟

custom 51975382192347249268custom 51998563762931314822custom 51995664917704541391custom 51999397544932480731

Signed ⋆ 𝓞𝓡𝓔𝓞

17 Jul 2026, 21:00 UTC267 views29 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 525352397263655551810custom 52243104726725565047custom 52719402340560630836custom 54115231578928070074custom 52625273622553076551custom 53098226272908345271

Signed ⋆ 𝓞𝓡𝓔𝓞

17 Jul 2026, 07:59 UTC108 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ооочень спонтанно, в 00:00 будет пост в Хару🔪

custom 53076472048805746306custom 54115231578928070073custom 52535239726365555182

Signed ⋆ 𝓞𝓡𝓔𝓞

14 Jul 2026, 08:30 UTC77 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @misternorisVideo

🔥 Вспомним, как это было! МИСТЕР НОРИС АЗИЯ ФЕСТ в МЕГАНОМе - это косплей, море общения, любимая азиатская еда 🍜 и розыгрыш главного приза - планшета! 🎉 Все было вау! Победители уже получили свои призы. Ждем реакции: 🔥 Был(а) там ❤️ Жду снова 👍 Еще фест 📍Севастополь Набережная Парка Победы, 12, здание 1 📍Севастополь ТЦ «Посейдон» Пр. Октябрьской революции, 24 2 этаж 📍Севастополь ТЦ «Симол» Пр. Ген. Острякова, 2

custom 53076125616743649301

Signed ⋆ 𝓞𝓡𝓔𝓞

11 Jul 2026, 18:36 UTC192 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Сегодняшний день был просто замечательным! Впервые со мной так часто фоткались. Кафешка красивая, еда вкусная. Спасибо друзьяшкам, с вами было очень весело🌟🌟

custom 54043873317235178375custom 54110769365605560485

Signed ⋆ 𝓞𝓡𝓔𝓞

11 Jul 2026, 08:03 UTC305 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 54110769365605560481

Signed ⋆ 𝓞𝓡𝓔𝓞

11 Jul 2026, 08:03 UTC107 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

В норисе 🌟

custom 54043873317235178371

Signed ⋆ 𝓞𝓡𝓔𝓞

9 Jul 2026, 18:59 UTC88 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @YugiCosplayVideo

ю чжин | си ан мне очень понравилось косплеить юля, мы хорошо отснялись, а дальше уже проф фотос🌟 #chaeyul

custom 54719779020755587753

Signed ⋆ 𝓞𝓡𝓔𝓞

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Orellliecos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 460,962 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝑶𝒓𝒆𝒍𝒍𝒊𝒆” (@Orellliecos), 136 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Orellliecos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.