Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐎rchadé𝐋i𝐒a 🪭

Channel

𝐎rchadé𝐋i𝐒a 🪭

@OrchadeLiSaa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

583subscribers

-52 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003262878081
TypeChannel
Username@OrchadeLiSaa
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/OrchadeLiSaa

Growth

5836356097 August 2026 — 635 subscribers8 August 2026 — 634 subscribers8 August 2026 — 634 subscribers15 August 2026 — 606 subscribers23 August 2026 — 583 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 16 days, net -52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 575–643 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 13:47583-23
15 Aug 2026, 16:18606-28
8 Aug 2026, 02:49634no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:23634-1
7 Aug 2026, 18:26635first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 5 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

403 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👀403100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 403reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 22 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 4 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @OrchadeLiSaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 4 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 June 2026 to 22 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Jun 2026, 13:21 UTC91 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Story of Golden Locks (ca. 1870) by Seymour Joseph Guy (1824-1910) Oil on canvas, 86.4 x 71.1 cm Loc.: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York In a quiet, warmly lit room, a young girl sits on the edge of her bed, her golden hair glowing in the dim light. This is not just a portrait, but a narrative painting from the American artist Seymour Joseph Guy, bringing the famous fairy tale of "Golden Locks" (Goldilocks

👀2

13 Jun 2026, 19:53 UTC362 views197 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Eyes removed from the face and placed on books or plates appear throughout the history of art, mythology, and religious imagery. They are rarely about physical sight alone. More often, they point toward vision of another kind: intuition, revelation, memory, conscience, or the life of the soul. In Christian iconography, saints such as Saint Lucy and Saint Odilia are depicted carrying their eyes as symbols of martyrdo

👀197

13 Jun 2026, 19:53 UTC312 views78 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

تظهر العيون المنفصلة عن الوجه والموضوعة على الكتب أو الأطباق في تاريخ الفن والأساطير والصور الدينية. ونادرًا ما تشير إلى البصر المادي فحسب، بل غالبًا ما تدل على رؤية من نوع آخر: الحدس، أو الوحي، أو الذاكرة، أو الضمير، أو حياة الروح. في الأيقونات المسيحية، يُصوَّر قديسون مثل القديسة لوسي والقديسة أوديليا حاملين عيونهم كرموز للشهادة والشفاء والإدراك الروحي. وقد حوّل الفنانون السرياليون هذا الرمز لاحقًا إلى بُعد نفسي،

👀78

5 Jun 2026, 09:20 UTC238 views126 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

The widowed Lady Anne walks in mourning amidst the funeral procession of her father-in-law, King Henry VI— the man walking beside her, attempting to gain her affection, is the very man who killed the king.🤡 Worse still, he also killed the prince, Lady Anne’s late husband. The Lady knows of Richard’s guilt, and accuses him as such: 😌 “Thou wast provoked by thy bloody mind That never dream’st on aught but butcheries.

👀126

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @OrchadeLiSaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐎rchadé𝐋i𝐒a 🪭” (@OrchadeLiSaa), 583 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OrchadeLiSaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.