Channel
@OrbisInvestment
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
142subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003177448247 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OrbisInvestment |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OrbisInvestment |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 142 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 144 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 146 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:32 | 147 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:27 | 147 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:29 | 148 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 18 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 December 2025 to 9 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
5/ One of the cleanest stablecoin setups in DeFi right now. ~25% net APY on stables Plus, you’re farming 2 potential airdrops at the same time. Hard to ask for more. 🔚 Retweet if you want to support my content ❤️ https://x.com/OrbisInvestIV/status/2009647028507431267?
4/ Why $ONyc matters 👀 @onrefinance brings reinsurance premiums onchain: • Yield not tied to crypto cycles • Historically uncorrelated returns • Backed by RWAs from a $750B+ TradFi market • NAV pricing via Chainlink oracle → safer leverage Below the summary of the current reinsurance deals providing coverage for the ONyc program 👇
3/ Let’s put numbers on it 📊 At ~4.5x leverage: • ~$45k in $ONyc earning ~10.87% • ~$35k borrowed in USDC paying ~8.51% • Net APY ≈ 25.59% That’s ~+136% more yield vs just holding $ONyc unlevered. Both assets are dollar-pegged so liquidation risk is structurally low (not zero, but controlled).
2/ What’s the play? @DeFiCarrot Boost turns leverage loops into a one-click strategy: • Deposit $ONyc (or $USDC / $USDG) • Choose your leverage (up to ~4.5x) • Boost automates the entire loop • Your collateral keeps earning yield the whole time No rebalancing. No headaches.
❤1
🥕 Best DeFi loop this week: @DeFiCarrot 🫡 $ONyc Boost → ~25.6% APY on stables Flying under the radar 👀 Real yield. No emissions. No manual looping. Here’s the full breakdown (5 posts) 🧵👇
🛢️ Petróleo: vendido, odiado y olvidado. WTI 57$, -19% interanual. Cuando nadie lo quiere en cartera… 👀 ¿es justo cuando empieza a ser interesante?
HACIENDA va a saber TODO lo que tienes en crypto desde 2026. Te quedan 2 días para que hagas los deberes. Esto es la DAC8. Nueva normativa europea que obliga a exchanges, custodios y plataformas crypto a reportar automáticamente a Hacienda: • Saldos • Operaciones • Movimientos históricos • Vinculación wallet ↔ identidad fiscal • Intercambio de datos entre países de la UE No es solo CEX. También afecta a DeFi, br…
This is what happens when TradFi assets move onchain with better rails, better liquidity, and fewer middlemen.
Imagine earning up to ~65% APY while holding exposure to stocks, not crypto. Yes — this already exists. And it’s built on @Loopscale, using equity liquidity coming from @FlashTrade. Let me explain. Stocks from @RemoraMarkets can now be traded with leverage on FlashTrade. That trading activity feeds FLP.r, the LP token that backs the market. FLP.r is a basket of tokenized equities like $NVDA, $TSLA, $SPY, plus US…
Quién va ganando la carrera de la IA? 🤖 Ganadores claros hasta ahora: • Broad AI / hyperscalers • Data centers y eléctricas • Energía / utilities Ahí es donde ha ido el capex en IA: cómputo, infraestructura y energía. Quienes aún no se han beneficiado: • Beneficiarios de productividad por IA • Exposición a IA en China La IA ha puesto en precio capacidad primero, no productividad. El siguiente tramo depende de qui…
¿Y si la sobrevaloración del Mag 7 está justificada? Este gráfico lo explica. • Mag 7 crecimiento del BPA 2026: +20% • S&P 500: ~14% • S&P 493: ~11% y desacelerando La prima de valoración no es aleatoria. El mercado paga por crecimiento, visibilidad y dominio. La pregunta clave no es por qué el Mag 7 está caro — sino qué ocurre si ese crecimiento decepciona.
📊 Casi todo está caro. Al mismo tiempo. • La renta variable de EE. UU. en percentiles de valoración >90% • Spreads de crédito cerca de mínimos históricos • Incluso el high yield se ve exigente • Solo los tipos reales no gritan “burbuja”… todavía Cuando acciones y bonos están caros a la vez, los retornos futuros suelen decepcionar. El riesgo no es lo que compras, sino lo que pagas.
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @OrbisInvestment. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@OrbisInvestment named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Orbis Investment” (@OrbisInvestment), 142 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OrbisInvestment.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.