Channel
@OpulousAnnouncements
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,003subscribers
-28 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001244579834 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OpulousAnnouncements |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OpulousAnnouncements |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 1,003 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:25 | 1,007 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 1,011 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:43 | 1,014 | -6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:55 | 1,020 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 1,021 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 1,022 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 1,027 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 1,030 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 1,031 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 1,031 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
199 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 111 | 55.8% | |
| 👍 | 59 | 29.6% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 11.6% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 2.51% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.503% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 199 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 February 2026 to 15 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Statement to the Opulous Community Over the past month we have been dealing with the consequences of the Messina bridge incident that released a large portion of OPUL into the market.... See The Post On X
❤1
After the recent exploit, we removed liquidity from the Messina bridge as a protective measure. This left some bridge transactions stuck and unable to complete. We've now sent all pending OPUL tokens back to the affected wallets on Arbitrum. If this affected you, check your wallet; your tokens are there. For any questions, reach out to us at [email protected]. See The Post On X
❤9👍6
An update on the recent Messina Bridge hack. We have now received a report from Messina outlining the root cause of the exploit. Here is their summary: “The root cause of the Messina bridge exploit was a flaw in a feature called ‘Hop’, added to support the Plume chain before Wormhole officially supported it. This feature was not audited and contained critical missing checks. As a result, the system incorrectly tre…
👍11👎1
Community Update – Bridge Incident We want to keep our everyone informed as this situation develops. Police reports have been filed. We are currently awaiting a final technical report from the Messina bridge team, which will inform our next steps. Once we have that report, we will share a full and transparent update with the community. We know you have questions so do we. We appreciate your patience and will comm…
👍6
Update on the Messina Bridge Incident We wanted to give you all an update on where things stand. The Messina bridge team is continuing to investigate the technical side of the exploit on their end while our team has been focused on tracking every wallet connected to the attacker. We are actively collaborating with MEXC, KuCoin, and OKX to identify and track wallets linked to the attacker. Some accounts have been f…
❤11👍4👎2
Update on the Messina Bridge Incident The last few days have been incredibly difficult for everyone. We want you to know we have been working around the clock since the moment this happened. Here is where we are: 1. We are working directly with multiple exchanges to identify and limit further damage. 2. The full attacker wallet network has been mapped across six chains and is being tracked in real time. 3. Police …
❤12
We are aware of a security incident involving the pool bridge on messina. Our team is actively investigating and working to secure all affected infrastructure. We have identified the attacker's wallets and are coordinating with exchanges, forensics firms, and law enforcement. More details shortly. See The Post On X
❤1
Hello everyone, please note the tech team is investigating the issue related to the token dump. We believe it was an issue with the token bridge. We'll keep everyone updated as we go.
👍8❤1
Hello everyone, A fake Opulous group has been brought to my attention. Please note that there is no migration and no token contract upgrade happening at the moment. This is the official Opulous channel, and all legitimate updates will always be posted here. If you come across any other group claiming otherwise, please report it and leave immediately, as it is fake. Stay safe and beware of scammers.
❤1
The yield landscape in 2026: ⚫️ T-bills: 4-5% (TradFi) ⚫️ Crypto lending: 5-7%, backed by crypto borrowers ⚫️ Points farming: complicated, diluted, zero guarantees OVAULT: ⚫️ Stake USDC ⚫️ APY from real music catalog acquisitions + artist advances ⚫️ Pool grows with every payment. No restaking. No claiming Music generates $29.6B/year. It's grown every single year for a decade. Your yield source probably hasn't. opu…
❤7👍2🍾1
Music generated $29.6 billion in revenue last year. It's grown for 10 consecutive years straight. 752 million people pay for it monthly. And almost none of that income has ever been accessible to investors. That's changing. 🧵 See The Post On X
🔥9❤2
We were tokenizing RWAs before it was cool Michael Jackson. Whitney Houston. Mariah Carey. Prince. Celine Dion. BTS. This is OVAULT. Music onchain earn up to 10% APY. 👇 opulous.org/ovault See The Post On X
❤9🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OpulousAnnouncements. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OPULOUS ANNOUNCEMENTS” (@OpulousAnnouncements), 1,003 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OpulousAnnouncements.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.