Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Опти Поба | Всё о Лацио 🦅

@OptiPob

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

846subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001773316595
TypeChannel
Username@OptiPob
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/OptiPob

Growth

839846842.56 August 2026 — 839 subscribers6 August 2026 — 839 subscribers14 August 2026 — 846 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 838–847 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:47846+7
6 Aug 2026, 15:05839no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:17839first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
56.3%
avg views ÷ 846 subscribers
Avg views / post
477
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held13 (27 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total6,197
Reactions total326
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

326 reactions across 13 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁8726.7%
🤡5316.3%
3912.0%
custom 53484528688211194043711.3%
👍3510.7%
🔥247.36%
custom 5303378011683301845216.44%
custom 5348193422731669223154.60%
👎51.53%
custom 532599240606614388241.23%
😭41.23%
💯20.613%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 326reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 19:53 UTC231 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Очередная победа «Лацио»! «Лацио» - «Остия-Маре» 4:0. 🇮🇹Опти Поба🇮🇹

7👍5🔥2😁2

5 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC197 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @tg_calcioPhoto

La Gazzetta dello Sport: Ратков забил четыре мяча за лето и убедил Гаттузо оставить его в «Лацио» 22-летний нападающий стал лучшим бомбардиром «бьянкочелести» в предсезонных матчах и заслужил доверие нового главного тренера. Петар Ратков проводит яркую подготовку к сезону: серб забил «Фламинии», оформил дубль в матче с «Авеллино», а затем принес «Лацио» победу над «Асколи». Всего на его счету четыре гола. Сербский

custom 530337801168330184514🤡4

3 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC312 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Обзор матча 🇮🇹Опти Поба🇮🇹

8👍5custom 53481934227316692233

2 Aug 2026, 23:11 UTC243 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @lazioonlinePhoto

Волевая, как Гаттузо! 🦏 ASCOLI - LAZIO 1-2 61' Chakir, 66' - Zaccagni, 88' Ratkov LAZIO (4-3-3): Mandas (74' Motta); Lazzari (74' Floriani Mussolini), Doekhi (74' Bordon), Provstgaard (74' Romagnoli), Marusic (74' Pedraza); Dele-Bashiru (74' Belahyane), Rovella (74' Farcomeni), Taylor (74' Przyborek); Noslin (74' Cancellieri), Dia (74' Ratkov), Zaccagni (74' Serra).

👍10🔥73😁1

2 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC350 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

В 21:00 стартует товарищеский матч с «Асколи». Ожидается 3000 болельщиков «Лацио». Трансляция тут: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iC20qZBQ5q4 🇮🇹Опти Поба🇮🇹

custom 53481934227316692237👍4🔥31custom 53259924060661438821

1 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC435 views31 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Болельщики спустились на дно океана чтобы передать привет Клаудио Лотито 😘 🇮🇹Опти Поба🇮🇹

😁22custom 53484528688211194045custom 53259924060661438823👍1

1 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC312 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @sslazioruVideo

«Лацио » Гаттузо одержал третью победу подряд. После побед над «Примаверой» и «Фламиниа Чивита Кастеллана», бьянкочелести также выиграли товарищеский матч против «Авеллино» со счетом 6:3. Серра забил первый гол, затем Ратков отличился дважды. Белахьяне открыл счет во втором тайме, после чего Артистико реализовал пенальти, а Тейлор закрепил победу незадолго до финального свистка. Завтра, в воскресенье, 2 августа, Дзак

👍5🔥4💯2

1 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC383 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Очередная победа! Тейлор взялся за ум и даже забил. 🇮🇹Опти Поба🇮🇹

9🔥8👍1

30 Jul 2026, 18:10 UTC314 views50 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @supertifoPhoto

🇮🇹В Токио живет один японский тифозо «Лацио», который каждый день публикует в соцсетях пост с призывом: «Лотито, уходи!» -Из самого сердца Токио - Гинзы- я снова кричу чтоб мой голос достиг Рима. Лотито, уходи! Свободу Лацио! -Добрый день из Токио в этот вторник. Снова ни одного усиления клуба, а на футболке нету спонсора. Это руководство - ужасное! Лотито Уходи! -Привет из Токио! Сегодня воскресенье, утро. День

custom 53484528688211194041911😁9custom 53033780116833018455😭4👍2

30 Jul 2026, 10:34 UTC≈1,930 views32 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Laziopress сообщает, что Галустян ссорится с лидером команды. Кеннет Тейлор пожаловался на полученный в единоборстве удар и в то же время получил порцию критики от Гаттузо. Порка не была оценена Тейлором, который, по-видимому, выразил свое разочарование, не обращаясь напрямую к тренеру. В этот момент ситуация сразу же увеличила напряжение на поле. Гаттузо решил прекратить тренировку. Тренер «Лацио» подошел к Тейлор

😁15🤡9👎4👍2custom 53481934227316692232

29 Jul 2026, 10:45 UTC464 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

«Лацио» достиг принципиальной договорённости о трансфере Юнуса Муса на аренду за 2 миллиона с опцией выкупа за 18 миллионов, которая становится обязательной при квалификации в европейские соревнования. Однако, Аморим попросил отложить сделку, чтобы понаблюдать за игроком в роли как полузащитника, так и крайнего защитника. 🇮🇹Опти Поба🇮🇹

🤡11custom 53484528688211194047custom 53481934227316692233custom 53033780116833018452

28 Jul 2026, 12:31 UTC476 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Постепенно проявляем интерес ко всем нападающим «Милана».

🤡18😁8👎1custom 53484528688211194041

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @OptiPob. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 303,142 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Опти Поба | Всё о Лацио 🦅” (@OptiPob), 846 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OptiPob.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.