Channel
@OprosikiHeidgarochki
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
44subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003280410901 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OprosikiHeidgarochki |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 4 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OprosikiHeidgarochki |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 44 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 45 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 45 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
45 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😭 | 13 | 28.9% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 20.0% | |
| 💘 | 7 | 15.6% | |
| custom 5262915953716386943 | 5 | 11.1% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 8.89% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 6.67% | |
| 💊 | 2 | 4.44% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 2.22% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.22% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2026 to 10 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
٩🪽🪽Крч наша самая любимая, сексуальная, ахуительная и просто хорошая Тётя Хедгарочка наконец создала новый канал по опросам, вот он: @OprosikiOtHeidgarochki А ещё новый канал по рисованию кому интересно: @LyubiteMenya
❤4🔥1
Signed риджина клубнiчковна
привет, наши дети с хэйдгой😘 Наша самая любимая, ослепительная, сексуальная, ахуительная и просто пиздатая тётя, а точнее владелец канала будет создавать новый канал по опросам через неделю. Как вы поняли, то она всё же потеряла аккаунт, а значит потеряла права к этому каналу, именно по этой причине придется создавать новый канал. Так же она создаст новый канал по рисованию и кому будет интересно, то могут зайти по …
💘6❤3
Signed риджина клубнiчковна
Ребят, с владельцем все в порядке!! Она не может зайти в свой телефон из-за проблем с паролем, она сообщила об этом вчера с телефона нашей общей знакомой
😭7🦄1
Signed риджина клубнiчковна 🍰🍰
Приношу свои извинения за сильную не активность. Давайте всё проясню: Моё моральное состояние с сначала года пошло ко дну и мне было плохо. Я не хотела ничего делать, я не хотела с кем-то общалась. Максимум со своими друзьями общаюсь, но внутри продолжаю чувствовать пустоту. С каждым днём мне становится хуже и лень буквально меня поглощает. Я с трудом хожу в школу заставляя себя. В школе у меня так же проблемы, напри…
😭6😢3❤1❤🔥1💊1🦄1
Signed ⟢ 𓂃 ׄ𝒪ྀིׅ𝒱ׄ𝐸 ☃️ 𐋏ꤕ꤯ꤤɠꤌ ۪ #TLF 𑄻𑄾
#Самопиар
Signed ⟢ 𓂃 ׄ𝒪ྀིׅ𝒱ׄ𝐸 ☃️ 𐋏ꤕ꤯ꤤɠꤌ ۪ #TLF 𑄻𑄾
🤍eidga Dessine ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ Пр, я Хэйдга. если быть точнее начинающий художник самоучка. 💤 альт: ебучая школота у которой даже нету паспорта, но ей очень сильно хочется иметь фанов и просто быть крутой ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ Подпишись пж : : ➿ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩. ➿ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ➿ @LyubiteHeidga // @LyubiteHeidga
Signed ⟢ 𓂃 ׄ𝒪ྀིׅ𝒱ׄ𝐸 ☃️ 𐋏ꤕ꤯ꤤɠꤌ ۪ #TLF 𑄻𑄾
Лучший трэк Baby Cute?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed ⟢ 𓂃 ׄ𝒪ྀིׅ𝒱ׄ𝐸 ☃️ 𐋏ꤕ꤯ꤤɠꤌ ۪ #WITES 𑄻𑄾
Лучшая песня от Просто Лера?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed ⟢ 𓂃 ׄ𝒪ྀིׅ𝒱ׄ𝐸 ☃️ 𐋏ꤕ꤯ꤤɠꤌ ۪ #IWTBWY 𑄻𑄾
Лучшая песня от Billie Eilish?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed ⟢ 𓂃 ׄ𝒪ྀིׅ𝒱ׄ𝐸 ☃️ 𐋏ꤕ꤯ꤤɠꤌ ۪ #IWTBWY 𑄻𑄾
Лучшая песня от группы linkin park?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed ⟢ 𓂃 ׄ𝒪ྀིׅ𝒱ׄ𝐸 ☃️ 𐋏ꤕ꤯ꤤɠꤌ ۪ #IWTBWY 𑄻𑄾
Что же... Новый год прошёл, зима заебала, вот и новая аватарка подъехала Оцените новую аватарку, пожалуйста (её, кстати, делал совладелец этого канала. Хотелось бы выразить ему отдельную благодарность в этом) #Щᥰ #𐌲᧐ρячᥲя𐌗ᥱᥔдᴦᥲρ᧐чκᥲ
custom 52629159537163869433❤1💘1
Signed ⟢ 𓂃 ׄ𝒪ྀིׅ𝒱ׄ𝐸 ☃️ 𐋏ꤕ꤯ꤤɠꤌ ۪ #IWTBWY 𑄻𑄾
Channel photo updated
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OprosikiHeidgarochki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 11 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Лучший трэк Baby Cute?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Лучшая песня от Просто Лера?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Лучшая песня от Billie Eilish?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Лучшая песня от группы linkin park?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Лучшая песня от kanima?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Лучшая песня Планки?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2026 to 10 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Опросы от Горячей Хейдгарочки” (@OprosikiHeidgarochki), 44 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OprosikiHeidgarochki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.