Channel
@OperationNewEarth
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
654subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001616957517 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OperationNewEarth |
| Created | 15 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OperationNewEarth |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 654 | +8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 646 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 646 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (28 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,260 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 02:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
12 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 5 | 41.7% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 25.0% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 16.7% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 8.33% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Aaron Rodgers is a hero! Make this interview go viral. Is Fauci going to get away with what he did to the U.S., to our children and grandchildren, to all of humanity???
Please SHARE & SUBSCRIBE to Do-Nothing RADIO'S newest exclusive! Time to Unite! https://youtu.be/PgO1OuettzE?si=2e1RcywZaZC6CRht
🔥1
Were you told that senior FDA officials were given dozens of safety signals associated with the Covid injection? FAUCI: "I respectfully decline to answer." Subscribe and share👉 @SenRonJohnsonUS
Great!
The Fall of the Cabal: THE END OF THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT (Documentary Series). Part One | Part Two | Part Three | Part Four | Part Five | Part Six | Part Seven | Part Eight | Part Nine | Part Ten To Watch | THE SEQUEL TO THE FALL OF THE CABAL DOCUMENTARY SERIES | Click Here Join The Group: Click Here
🔥1
MILITARY TRIBUNALS ⚔️⚔️ Civilian Courts v Military Tribunals Executive Order - 13818 Executive Order - 13848 Executive Order - 13903 Executive Order - 13928 Manual for Courts Martial Military is the only way ⚔️⚔️ No Deals !!! @SecStateMarcoRubio
🥰2❤1
THIS IS A MAJOR SCANDAL! Senator Ron Johnson: “This is a MAJOR SCANDAL! Hundreds of thousands of people are permanently disabled or lost their life because our FDA ignored the COVID injection harms.” Hundreds of thousands. Permanently disabled. Dead. Because the FDA ignored the 25 safety signals of deadly serious adverse events. The mainstream media still won’t cover it. They’re protecting the narrative instead o…
Join us live! https://rumble.com/v7dlmjy-two-tiered-takedown-sun-6pm-pdt-judge-bell-caught-on-filmcommissioners-erup.html?e9s=src_v1_cbl%2Csrc_v1_ucp_a
🔥2
Nursery rhymes are not so innocent.😳
Crimes Against Humanity They rewrote the dictionary so Fauci’s ‘Covid Vaccines’ could still be called ‘Vaccines’ because the science wouldn’t bend…so the language had to… 9:26 PM · Jul 31, 2026 X LINK Remember this?
.@SECWAR: “You talk about spirit all the time, and you’re right to do so. When you RIP OUT DEI—when you RIP OUT SOCIAL ENGINEERING AND SOCIAL JUSTICE, and you put in merit, and you untie the hands of commanders to be COMMANDERS… Then you get historic reenlistment inside of our ranks… Historic recruitment records among young Americans—EVERY MONTH OUR DEPARTMENT BREAKS RECORDS.” @SecWarPeteHegseth
Anthony Fauci literally wrote in his diary Covid was only a 0.2% fatality rate Anthony Fauci is confronted over writing in his diary that Covid 19 was essentially just the flu but then and locked down for a global pandemic and mandated vaccines “Dr. Fauci, you admitted in your own diary that COVID was nothing more than a flu — Are you ever going to admit that you killed millions of people through your poison shots?…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @OperationNewEarth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 740,312 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@OperationNewEarth named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“One New Earth” (@OperationNewEarth), 654 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OperationNewEarth.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.