Колонка с маскировочной крышкой.

Channel
open source conspiracy
@OpenSourceConspiracy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
114subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001238699782 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OpenSourceConspiracy |
| Created | 13 October 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OpenSourceConspiracy |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 114 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 113 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 113 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 3 March 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 March 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 17s
- Average length
- 17s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Старая инструкция для этого квеста с аудиоколонками.
Video, posted without a caption
Одна старая акция. 17 марта 2018 неизвестные установили по всей Москве колонки, проигрывающие оскорбительные для кандидатов в президенты фразы. «Прошлый квест я закончил больше месяца назад. Мне не хватало этого чувства причастности к общему делу, к Плану. Подземный переход, который отмечен на моей карте, полон людей. Они спешат туда и сюда, не оглядываясь и не задерживая на мне глаз. Таймер выставлен на пять мин…
Анонимы призывают к агитации против войны и показывают пример: https://t.me/fckthewar/7?single https://t.me/fckthewar/4
Подписчик присылает фото собственной агитации. Канал: @RUsOFF.
Подписчики присылают отчёты.
Подписчики провели акцию «Задержание Фемиды». Вот их канал: https://t.me/freaksinpics/106 Видео: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TpN-2jZeDAQ
Присылают отчёты. +15 стикеров. На фото – фальшивый стикер городских служб.
Нуар. Анархо-агитация, замаскированная под рекламу Макдака.
Подписчики попросили опубликовать: https://t.me/freaksinpics/98
File, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @OpenSourceConspiracy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,112,260 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@OpenSourceConspiracy named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“open source conspiracy” (@OpenSourceConspiracy), 114 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OpenSourceConspiracy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.