Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

open source conspiracy

@OpenSourceConspiracy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

114subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001238699782
TypeChannel
Username@OpenSourceConspiracy
Created13 October 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/OpenSourceConspiracy

Growth

113114113.56 August 2026 — 113 subscribers9 August 2026 — 113 subscribers13 August 2026 — 114 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 113–114 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:45114+1
9 Aug 2026, 06:18113no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:05113first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 3 March 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 March 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

4 Mar 2022, 12:56 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Колонка с маскировочной крышкой.

4 Mar 2022, 12:41 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Старая инструкция для этого квеста с аудиоколонками.

4 Mar 2022, 12:33 UTC932 viewsread 9 August 2026

Одна старая акция. 17 марта 2018 неизвестные установили по всей Москве колонки, проигрывающие оскорбительные для кандидатов в президенты фразы. ​​«Прошлый квест я закончил больше месяца назад. Мне не хватало этого чувства причастности к общему делу, к Плану. Подземный переход, который отмечен на моей карте, полон людей. Они спешат туда и сюда, не оглядываясь и не задерживая на мне глаз. Таймер выставлен на пять мин

14 Feb 2022, 20:42 UTC758 viewsread 9 August 2026

Анонимы призывают к агитации против войны и показывают пример: https://t.me/fckthewar/7?single https://t.me/fckthewar/4

27 Oct 2021, 15:21 UTC812 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Подписчик присылает фото собственной агитации. Канал: @RUsOFF.

6 Jun 2021, 08:55 UTC915 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Подписчики провели акцию «Задержание Фемиды». Вот их канал: https://t.me/freaksinpics/106 Видео: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TpN-2jZeDAQ

1 Jun 2021, 09:49 UTC749 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Присылают отчёты. +15 стикеров. На фото – фальшивый стикер городских служб.

24 Apr 2021, 14:22 UTC735 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Нуар. Анархо-агитация, замаскированная под рекламу Макдака.

14 Mar 2021, 10:55 UTC799 viewsread 9 August 2026

Подписчики попросили опубликовать: https://t.me/freaksinpics/98

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @OpenSourceConspiracy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,112,260 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“open source conspiracy” (@OpenSourceConspiracy), 114 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OpenSourceConspiracy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.