Channel
@Opastaunt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
208subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001525994340 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Opastaunt |
| Description | Fragen zur Situation |
| Created | 17 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Opastaunt |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 208 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:20 | 208 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
8 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5 | 62.5% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 37.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2024 to 19 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📽 Ich bin ja dafür, dass man sich jede Verschwörungstheorie anhört, aber dass manche Linke immer noch meinen, dass Trump das Attentat selbst inszeniert hätte, ist angesichts dieser Bilder wirklich pure Schwurbelei. Unsere politischen Kanäle: ➡️ t.me/GlobalPatriots 🦅 ➡️ t.me/GlobalPatriotMEMES 💣
👍5❤2
Signed ramon
Prinz William soll "unbekannte" Frau als "Wurst" beleidigt haben – es war Franziska Giffey https://www.stern.de/lifestyle/leute/prinz-william-soll-franziska-giffey--wurst--genannt-haben-34885002.html
Signed ramon
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed ramon
ProjectGoslow - Trump Trump Baby
Signed ramon
File, posted without a caption
Signed ramon
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed ramon
Hallo Liebe Leute, in Berlin sind nun Ferien und mein Töchterchen hat ein Zeugnis vorgezeigt, welches mich stolz macht und mich freut. Nun heißt es drei Wochen Urlaub mit dem Kind und damit verbunden wird es hier eine kleine Sommerpause geben, in der ich keinerlei Nachrichten verfolgen werde. Also nicht wundern, dass hier nun nichts gepostet wird und dass obwohl sich möglicherweise die Ereignisse überschlagen. Ic…
❤1
Signed ramon
Sachsen Kretschmer kritisiert Boykott der EU-Kommission gegen Ungarn "Man kann über die Erfolgsaussichten der Gespräche von Viktor Orban geteilter Meinung sein", schrieb der CDU-Politiker auf der Plattform X. Trotzdem gelte: "Jede Bemühung um einen Frieden in Europa ist es wert, ernst genommen zu werden." Der Boykott der EU-Kommission habe "etwas Schulmeisterliches". "So geht man in einer Union gleichberechtigter St…
Signed ramon
„Eklatanter Verstoß“ – Mehrheit des EU-Parlaments verurteilt Orbáns Reise EU-Kommissionspräsidentin von der Leyen ordnete nach Viktor Orbáns „Friedensmission“ in der Ukraine-Politik einen Boykott der ungarischen Ratspräsidentschaft an. An den Boykott-Plänen übt Gerhard Papke, Präsident der Deutsch-Ungarischen Gesellschaft, scharfe Kritik. Video 6:51 Min. https://www.welt.de/politik/ausland/article252571148/Moskau-B…
Signed ramon
(S+) Jens Spahn über möglichen Machtwechsel in Washington: »Es wäre im deutschen Interesse, dass Scholz sich jetzt bei Trump meldet« https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/es-waere-im-deutschen-interesse-dass-scholz-sich-jetzt-bei-trump-meldet-a-194c86e5-6973-446e-ab7e-e4a30d498881?sara_ref=re-so-app-sh
Signed ramon
600 Gewächshausscheiben zerstört Landwirt: "Hagelkörner waren zackig wie gefrorenes Coronavirus" https://www.swr.de/swraktuell/baden-wuerttemberg/stuttgart/hagel-schaden-zackig-coronavirus-gaertnerei-remseck-100.html
Signed ramon
Analyse von Ulrich Reitz „Besorgniserregend“? Langs Urteil über Trumps neuen Vize ist noch weit untertrieben „Besorgniserregend für Europa“, findet Ricarda Lang Trumps „Running Mate“ JD Vance. Die Grünen fahren schon jetzt ihre Stachel aus gegen eine Regierung Trump. Sie haben allen Grund dazu. Mit einer Wahrscheinlichkeit von 70 Prozent, glaubt man den Buchmachern, wird Donald Trump der nächste US-Präsident. Sein …
Signed ramon
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Opastaunt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,033,123 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Opa staunt” (@Opastaunt), 208 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Opastaunt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.