Sticker, posted without a caption
🖕15😁11❤2

Channel
@Online_Anon
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,810subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001944925041 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Online_Anon |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Online_Anon |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:19 | 3,810 | +7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:11 | 3,803 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 3,803 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 2 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
533 reactions across 14 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 89 | 16.7% | |
| 😭 | 86 | 16.1% | |
| ❤ | 66 | 12.4% | |
| 👍 | 54 | 10.1% | |
| 🤣 | 53 | 9.94% | |
| 🫡 | 53 | 9.94% | |
| 🤡 | 30 | 5.63% | |
| 🕊 | 21 | 3.94% | |
| 🖕 | 15 | 2.81% | |
| 💩 | 14 | 2.63% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 1.69% | |
| 🤔 | 9 | 1.69% | |
| 🤯 | 9 | 1.69% | |
| 👀 | 6 | 1.13% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 0.938% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 0.75% | |
| 👻 | 2 | 0.375% | |
| 🗿 | 2 | 0.375% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 0.375% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.188% | |
| 3 further kinds | 3 | 0.563% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 533reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2025 to 15 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Sticker, posted without a caption
🖕15😁11❤2
隐退 2025.11 今后随意吧。 Development Think #频道公告
😭75🫡24🕊9❤3🙏3🤡2👀1😁1
https://f-droid.org/zh_Hans/packages/org.maoist2009.tlsfragment/ 这个软件利用TLS分段,可以绕过GFW 但只是绕过了屏蔽而以,毕竟不是代理 这就意味着你访问了什么当然是公开的,可能秋后算账 #软件推荐
🤔5❤1
https://telegra.ph/%E6%89%8B%E6%9C%BA%E4%BC%9A%E9%9D%99%E9%BB%98%E7%9B%91%E5%90%AC%E4%BA%BA%E7%9A%84%E8%B0%88%E8%AF%9D%E5%90%97-11-02 By wunnyside
🤯4🔥1
📱 安卓像素劫持攻击威胁双重认证安全 安全研究人员发现一种名为“像素劫持(Pixnapping)”的新型安卓攻击手段。该攻击通过恶意应用调用系统API,无需特殊权限即可读取其他应用显示的像素数据。攻击利用GPU侧信道技术,通过测量像素渲染时间推断屏幕内容,可窃取双重认证码、聊天消息等隐私信息。研究团队在谷歌Pixel 6至9和三星Galaxy S25设备上演示成功,部分设备攻击成功率超过50%。 谷歌已在9月安全公告中发布初步补丁,但研究人员称攻击改良版仍有效,预计12月将有额外修复。攻击每秒仅泄露0.6至2.1个像素,但足以威胁短期有效的2FA认证码。目前未发现实际利用案例,但突显了安卓安全机制的局限性。该技术基于2013年浏览器攻击,显示侧信道风险的持续性。 Ars Technica | The Register 🍀在花频道 🍵茶馆 📮投稿
👀4
所有主要供应商的 GPU 都容易受到新的像素窃取攻击 研究人员在周二发表的一篇论文中证明,所有六家主要供应商的 GPU 都容易受到新发现的攻击,该攻击允许恶意网站读取其他网站显示的用户名、密码和其他敏感视觉数据。 跨源攻击允许来自一个域(例如 example.com)的恶意网站有效地读取来自 example.org 或另一个不同域的网站显示的像素。然后,攻击者可以以允许他们查看后一个站点显示的文字或图像的方式重建它们。这种泄露违反了一项关键的安全原则,该原则构成了保护互联网的最基本的安全边界之一。它被称为同源策略,它要求一个网站域上托管的内容与所有其他网站域隔离。 来源:ars 投稿:@ZaiHuaBot 频道:@TestFlightCN
🤯5❤1👀1🙉1
10月11日,酷安社区讨论root模块携带恶意后门,盗取帐号密码。开源不等于无恶意后门,然而并没有人进行审计。root作为最高权限,必须被严格管理。负责网银、社交通讯的手机本身就不应该进行root。这些root基本都是为了些小功能的定制,意义不大。 我建议手机这样使用 。Pixel9 GrapheneOS 作为最高安全使用 。华为/iPhone作为日常微信和网银使用 。小米/一加进行解锁刷机,进行开发测试,并且可以玩机
💩14👍10😁6❤4
I’m turning 41, but I don’t feel like celebrating. Our generation is running out of time to save the free Internet built for us by our fathers. What was once the promise of the free exchange of information is being turned into the ultimate tool of control. Once-free countries are introducing dystopian measures such as digital IDs (UK), online age checks (Australia), and mass scanning of private messages (EU). Ger…
😭11🕊3❤2🙏2🌚1
If I were configuring a smartphone today, I'd use Daniel Micay's GrapheneOS as the base operating system. 如果我今天要配置智能手机,我会使用 Daniel Micay 的 GrapheneOS 作为基础操作系统。 ——Edward Snowden https://web.archive.org/web/20221115095932/https://twitter.com/snowden/status/1175430722733129729 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GrapheneOS https://grapheneos.org/
❤6👍6🔥2😁1
请频道编辑wunnyside联系任意管理员,验证身份后恢复联系
🤔4❤1🔥1
电报现状:大量无初中文凭的智障网民涌入,破坏这个和谐美好的社区环境
😁42👍25🤡12👏7❤2
强烈支持《无主之地2》扫描中国大陆用户硬盘,上传中国大陆用户隐私,将所有数据全部上传到境外服务器,大规模封禁中国大陆用户,让这些愚蠢的无所隐瞒论支持者使劲抵制,让我们网民智商集体下降,让网民陷入恐慌,警惕所有境外软件。
😁22👍4❤3👏2👻2🥴2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Online_Anon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“网络匿名教程讲解分析” (@Online_Anon), 3,810 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Online_Anon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.