Channel
@Onicryptoboxes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
739subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002398352665 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Onicryptoboxes |
| Description | Welcome to 😈 Daily giveaways and in return just give healthy reactions 🫶🏻💜 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 27 February 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Onicryptoboxes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 739 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 739 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
46 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😈 | 13 | 28.3% | |
| 🐳 | 9 | 19.6% | |
| ⚡ | 8 | 17.4% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 10.9% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 8.70% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 4.35% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 4.35% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 4.35% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 2.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 February 2025 to 28 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 Rocket-cheque for 392.1375 USDT (392.1$) Inside cheque: 10457 activation(s) for 0.03 USDT (0.03$) with referral reward 0.0075 USDT (0.008$) 💬 TGE $ASRR & listings on ByBit and other Tier 1 CEXs $ASRR $ASRR $ASRR $ASRR Don't miss your space in TGE
👻1🤣1
🚀 Rocket-cheque for 149.985 USDT (150.0$) Inside cheque: 3333 activation(s) for 0.03 USDT (0.03$) with referral reward 0.015 USDT (0.02$) 💬 $BEER 2.0 Presale starts May 21st, 5 PM UTC 🍺 First $BEER did 35x last year. $BEER 2.0 has much better tokenomics, all team tokens locked for 2 years and 70%+ of the funds are dedicated towards liquidity and buybacks. Maybe all of this will allow $BEER 2.0 to repeat the succe…
🐳2🤣1
https://app.binance.com/uni-qr/GN8vUgkY?utm_medium=web_share_copy
🐳4
🚀 Rocket-cheque for 100 USDT (100.0$) Inside cheque: 4000 activation(s) for 0.02 USDT (0.02$) with referral reward 0.005 USDT (0.005$) 💬 🎮 @WinPaco_bot — побеждай каждый день! 🎯 Игры Live - @winpaco 🔥 Ежедневные конкурсы и розыгрыши ждут тебя! 👉 Канал: @PacoCartel 👉 Чат: @ChatPaco 🎮 @WinPaco_bot — win every day! 🎯 Live Game - @winpaco 🔥 Daily contests and giveaways are waiting for you! 👉 Channel: @PacoCartel 👉 …
https://t.me/IncameTips24 First channel link
🚀 Rocket-cheque for 100.3875 USDT (100.4$) Inside cheque: 2677 activation(s) for 0.03 USDT (0.03$) with referral reward 0.0075 USDT (0.007$) 💬 🎁 Giveaway Channel 👇 https://t.me/IncameTips24 https://t.me/IncameTips24 https://t.me/IncameTips24 All Free Airdrop and Instant Kop Offer are shared on our channel, so earn 100$-500$ every month with us and join the Giveaway 🎁
🚀 Rocket-cheque for 184.275 USDT (184.2$) Inside cheque: 7371 activation(s) for 0.02 USDT (0.02$) with referral reward 0.005 USDT (0.005$)
BPGTUIFIG2
😍2
https://app.binance.com/uni-qr/2YFTxUy5?utm_medium=web_share_copy BNB this month🥰🥰
🍓2🤩2🤣1
🚀 Rocket-cheque for 18.46875 TON (67.9$) Inside cheque: 2955 activation(s) for 0.005 TON (0.02$) with referral reward 0.00125 TON (0.005$)
password: ItsssMUD
⚡2😈2
🚀 Rocket-cheque for 58.55 USDT (58.6$) with password Inside cheque: 2342 activation(s) for 0.02 USDT (0.02$) with referral reward 0.005 USDT (0.005$) 💬 пароль в 20:00 по МСК 🙀
😍2⚡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Onicryptoboxes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Onicryptoboxes named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“😈Oni_Crypto_boxes😈” (@Onicryptoboxes), 739 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Onicryptoboxes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.