Channel
@Onepetermultichain
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
889subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003727306555 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Onepetermultichain |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 11 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Onepetermultichain |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 889 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:14 | 895 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 897 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
161 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5424912684078348533 | 118 | 73.3% | |
| custom 5168388684218631350 | 13 | 8.07% | |
| ✍ | 10 | 6.21% | |
| 🤔 | 8 | 4.97% | |
| 🌚 | 5 | 3.11% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 1.86% | |
| custom 5456254812783910040 | 2 | 1.24% | |
| custom 5857371644032456043 | 2 | 1.24% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 161reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Onepetermultichain. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 June 2026 to 4 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
To be honest, $PD isn’t a coin I’d sleep on. It has all the ingredients to become GRAM’s version of Fartcoin—a strong meme, recognizable branding, and plenty of room for the narrative to grow. Keep it on your radar. CA: EQBFVuE7RYSzl35gCgP8LU_zpnBSnYsWlh9doIwsIT00DEMH
custom 54249126840783485336custom 51683886842186313501
Signed OnePeter °||°ADC 🧪 🥼
Telegram has never been just a messaging app. It is where memes are born, stickers become a language of their own, and entire communities develop unique cultures. Within that ecosystem, JOOBI stands as one of the oldest and most recognizable cultural icons. Created by Tanya Mau, JOOBI has been part of internet culture for over a decade. Many Telegram users have shared, reacted with, or laughed at these blue emoji w…
custom 54249126840783485337🤔2✍1
Signed OnePeter °||°ADC 🧪 🥼
EQA6BetqNB0-kcoufu7CIAiSIF3Iy95bJ5GLI8V6jiioAzwu New tweet.
custom 542491268407834853312😭3🤔2custom 51683886842186313502
Signed OnePeter °||°ADC 🧪 🥼
Bro, this should do something atleast Tf
custom 54249126840783485336custom 54562548127839100402✍1
Signed OnePeter °||°ADC 🧪 🥼
https://x.com/telegram/status/2070198650739810692?s=46
custom 54249126840783485332✍1🤔1
Signed OnePeter °||°ADC 🧪 🥼
BREAKING : The official website of The Open Network, ton.org, has been updated once again.
custom 54249126840783485336custom 51683886842186313501
Signed OnePeter °||°ADC 🧪 🥼
Help help, 6 more left
custom 54249126840783485336
Signed OnePeter °||°ADC 🧪 🥼
https://t.me/joobiongram Join. and help boost. Just 13 left
custom 54249126840783485335🌚3
Signed OnePeter °||°ADC 🧪 🥼
Guys, if you have premium, use it to boost us a bit. ☺️ https://t.me/boost?c=4440198824
custom 54249126840783485332custom 58573716440324560432✍1
Signed OnePeter °||°ADC 🧪 🥼
https://t.me/joobiongram
custom 54249126840783485335
Signed OnePeter °||°ADC 🧪 🥼
Telegram has never been just a messaging app. It is where memes are born, stickers become a language of their own, and entire communities develop unique cultures. Within that ecosystem, JOOBI stands as one of the oldest and most recognizable cultural icons. Created by Tanya Mau, JOOBI has been part of internet culture for over a decade. Many Telegram users have shared, reacted with, or laughed at these blue emoji w…
custom 54249126840783485334
Signed OnePeter °||°ADC 🧪 🥼
https://x.com/onepeterrr/status/2069069192993657142?s=46 Take note
custom 51683886842186313505custom 54249126840783485331
Signed OnePeter °||°ADC 🧪 🥼
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Onepetermultichain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 412,186 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Onepeter” (@Onepetermultichain), 889 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Onepetermultichain.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.