Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for -Red

Channel

-Red

@One_the_ta

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

46subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003222484298
TypeChannel
Username@One_the_ta
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/One_the_ta

Growth

4614 Aug 2026, 05:17 — 46 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 23:43 — 46 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 05:1714 Aug 2026, 23:43
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45–47 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 23:4346no change
14 Aug 2026, 05:1746first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 17 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
82.6%
avg views ÷ 46 subscribers
Avg views / post
38.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held19 (17 June 20261 August 2026)
Views total76
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

58 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🕊3458.6%
💋2136.2%
35.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC39 viewsread 14 August 2026

Ah, does my soul yearn for you, my beloved autumn, that we might cross paths once more, so I could stand in awe before your cascading strands of amber hair and those hands, chill as the winter's breath? 🍁🕯✨

7 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTC115 views2 reactionsread 14 August 2026

در انتها یه تحلیل دیگه هم درمورد این تابلو وجود داره، این تئوری، درمورد نسبت این تابلو به اولین گناه آدم و حوا در باغ اِدِن هست. گفته میشه که خیانت یک شیطان که نمای انسانی داشته-یهودا فرار آدم و حوا از این گناه-یوحنا جدا شدن انسان از خدا-دستگیری مسیح پسر خدا به اعدام. اولین گناه انسان و آخرین ماموریت شیطان.

🕊2

7 Jul 2026, 16:56 UTC121 views2 reactionsread 14 August 2026

یه فیگور دیگه هم هست که فانوس به دستش هست. کیه؟ خود کاراواجو، اونجا چیکار میکنه؟ این یکی از کارایی هست که کاراواجو خیلی انجام میده، قرار دادن خودش در تابلو های معروف تاریخی، برای اینکه نشون بده، اون وظیفهٔ انتقال این اطلاعات، این تاریخ و این واقعه به بقیه نسل ها و جاودانه کردنشون هست. فانوس هم دقیقا نماد روشن سازی و نمایان کردن واقعیت این اتفاق هست.

🕊2

7 Jul 2026, 16:54 UTC113 views4 reactionsread 14 August 2026

یوحنا، فیگور پشت مسیح درحال فریاد، که نشونهٔ ترس انسانیه، متحرک ترین فیگور، پارچهٔ قرمز لباسش درحال پرواز بالای سر مسیح هست، که نشونهٔ سرنوشت مرگبار مسیح هست. همچنین این پارچه بر اساس تحلیل بعضی از تحلیل‌گران، مربوط به نقاشی آفرینش آدم، نماد جایگاه خدا از مایکل آنجلو هست، از اونجایی که کاراواجو علاقش رو به مایکل آنجلو نشون داده، ربط پیدا کرده. توی تابلو آفرینش آدم، خدا درحال دادن حیات هست و در این، انگار پایان این مس

🕊4

7 Jul 2026, 16:50 UTC96 views3 reactionsread 14 August 2026

فیگور های مأمور، زره های براق آهنی و سردی دارن، دقیقا برعکس گرمی، نرمی و لطافت بدن مسیح، چشم‌هاشون مشخص نیست، نشون از بی هویت بودنشون، اونا افراد شخصی ای نیستن، هیچ مشکلی ندارن، اونا صرفا مامور های اعدام و دستگیر هستن. فقط یکی از مأمورا پشت مرد با فانوس وایساده، که چشماش مشخصه و در دورترین حالت از بقیه هست، حس hesitation و مکث.

💋3

7 Jul 2026, 16:46 UTC89 views3 reactionsread 14 August 2026

یهودا، که قرار بود یکی از دوستان و یار های مسیح باشه، دومین فرد مهم اینجا هست، که داره با یه بوسه روی گونهٔ مسیح، اون رو تحویل مأمورا میده، حس خیانت کامل. جالبیش اینجاست که هیچ قیافهٔ شیطانی ای وجود نداره، قیافه یهودا به شدت انسانیه، دستش محکم مسیح رو گرفته، انگار میخواد به آغوش بکشتش ولی درواقع، نگهش داشته که به مأمورا تحویلش بده.

🕊3

7 Jul 2026, 16:43 UTC97 views3 reactionsread 14 August 2026

و کل جاذبه به سمت یک فیگور هست که اون مسیح هست، آروم ترین فرد در کل نقاشی، تسلیم، قبول سرنوشتش، با اینکه کل بار روانی این نقاشی روی مسیح هست، اون آروم مونده و دستاشو گره زده و چشماشو بسته، رنگ آبی مقدس پوشیده.

🕊3

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @One_the_ta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,389,963 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“-Red” (@One_the_ta), 46 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/One_the_ta.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.