Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for This Gone Hurt

Channel

This Gone Hurt

@Onchainspyy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

127subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002094194794
TypeChannel
Username@Onchainspyy
Created22 May 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Onchainspyy

Growth

127128127.57 August 2026 — 128 subscribers9 August 2026 — 128 subscribers24 August 2026 — 127 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 17 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 127–128 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 23:49127-1
9 Aug 2026, 01:46128no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:15128first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 22 May 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯956.3%
🔥531.3%
😁212.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2024 to 5 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Apr 2026, 13:33 UTCviews —

This Gone Hurt pinned «We have a link to the dubai rats next scam https://courted.tv/ Be careful cuz this will 100% rug out if it ever launches! One of the most common ways these guys scam private sales is to have AN ILLEGAL IDEA. That way they can tell the private salers that…»

5 Apr 2026, 13:33 UTC137 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

We have a link to the dubai rats next scam https://courted.tv/ Be careful cuz this will 100% rug out if it ever launches! One of the most common ways these guys scam private sales is to have AN ILLEGAL IDEA. That way they can tell the private salers that the project got "shut down" before they could launch and unfortunately all private sale funds were used. This "idea" (if we can call it that) is in simple terms

💯3

Signed Jimmy

4 Apr 2026, 18:13 UTC113 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Meanwhile he is spending pvt sale funds on ladyboys in Thailand

💯2😁2

Signed Jimmy

4 Apr 2026, 18:13 UTC111 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

This clown is talking about accounting and shit ahah

💯2

Signed Jimmy

4 Apr 2026, 13:52 UTC111 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

This was 20% of his scams covered so far, got shit tons on him, also his upcoming projects, so people stay safe

💯1

Signed Jimmy

3 Apr 2026, 23:01 UTCviews —

This Gone Hurt pinned «Ryan John Hovells (aka “DubaiRat”) — Ongoing Pattern of Failed Launches and Broken Promises Ryan John Hovells, known online as “DubaiRat,” has been linked to a consistent pattern of failed crypto projects, questionable fundraising tactics, and unfulfilled…»

3 Apr 2026, 23:00 UTC117 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ryan John Hovells (aka “DubaiRat”) — Ongoing Pattern of Failed Launches and Broken Promises Ryan John Hovells, known online as “DubaiRat,” has been linked to a consistent pattern of failed crypto projects, questionable fundraising tactics, and unfulfilled promises. $RAGE Private Sale (SOL) Around two years ago, Ryan conducted a private sale for $RAGE, asking investors to send crypto directly to his wallet. The proj

💯1

Signed Jimmy

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Onchainspyy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 839,265 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“This Gone Hurt” (@Onchainspyy), 127 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Onchainspyy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.