Channel
@Onchain_Trader
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
153subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001936214240 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Onchain_Trader |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Onchain_Trader |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 153 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 154 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 155 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 155 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
155 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 55 | 35.5% | |
| 👍 | 54 | 34.8% | |
| 🔥 | 33 | 21.3% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 4.52% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 1.94% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 1.29% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.645% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 155reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 December 2023 to 30 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨 Official announcement: We have currently closed the "on-chain traders community" chat channel. However, if you are interested in the analysis and copying platform for on-chain traders on perpetual DEXs like GMX, Synthetix, gTrade, MUX, Kwenta, ... Please join the @Copin_io community to continue there. Thanks 🍻
👍4❤3👀1
🔈ONCHAIN TRADER BOT V2 ✨ Hello dear On-chain trader community! We are extremely excited to announce that our latest update at Onchain Trader BOT V2 is complete! These changes not only refresh your experience but also increase efficiency. Let's explore the unique features! 🔥 In this update, we have successfully integrated two more major protocols: ➕ #PolynomialFi ➕ #GMX V2 You will need to set up the wallet addre…
👍8❤2🔥2
BIG BOI ON #GMX V2 🟦 I'd like to introduce an address today that was previously mentioned in #GMX #1 but is now in #v2. All the skills remain unchanged. Just in the last 30 days: ⭐️Profit: $10,895,938 ⭐️ROI: 40.86% ⭐️Volume: $369,668,589 ⭐️Win rate: 76.47% Most of the traders we've analyzed have shown considerable skills and performance. If you catch the #bullrun and play it #bullish, this is something you should…
👍6❤1🔥1
How to quickly find a trader? 🔍 Whether you've been #trading with the bot for some time or are just starting out, it's easy to miss this section. Read more on 🕊 https://x.com/Onchain_Trader/status/1762173323411345575?s=20
❤3💯2🔥1
Congrats! @Copin_io 📌 If you've been longing for a more decentralized #CopyTrading version, now's your chance to jump in! It's slated to kick off on #Synthetix (available on #Optimism) 🔼 Read more: https://t.me/Copin_Channel/134
❤4💯1🔥1
🫐GMX V2 IS COMING ... Many of you have expressed interest and inquired about integrating #GMXV2. At this moment, we have successfully integrated it, and of course, you can track any wallet address on #GMXV2. However, this is still preliminary information. We are rebuilding the BOT's flow. We hope to bring you new and smoother experiences than ever before. Read more on 🕊: https://twitter.com/Onchain_Trader/status/1…
❤7🔥2💯1
Opportunity is always here; it's about how you seize it😉😌😍🥰 Read more on 🕊: https://twitter.com/Onchain_Trader/status/1752520165080859133🖥
🔥5❤1💯1
Have you ever counted how many trades you've made in the last 30 days? ⌨️ There's a wallet address on #GMX v1 that caught my attention. Personally, I don't think he's a bot, but he managed to maintain his passion and executed 368 trades in one month and 728 trades in two months. Read more on 🕊: https://twitter.com/Onchain_Trader/status/1750782365365162439🖥
👍2❤1🔥1
If today you're feeling down about being a liquidity provider? On several major #perpetual DEXs, over $65.95 million has been liquidated. For both LONG/SHORT. And on #CEX, in the past 24 hours • 79,502 traders were liquidated. • The total liquidation amounts to $213.68 million. The largest single liquidation order occurred on #Bybit - $BTC USDH24, valued at $5.00 million. Read more on 🕊: https://twitter.com/Onch…
👍6❤1👀1
According to the Parabolic Advance chart, we are currently in the second Advance phase (the second correction phase). After this, there is expected to be a resurgence. Then comes the third correction phase before the Bull Run in 2025. #TitanofCrypto 🧐 Do you think the cycle repeats, folks?
👍2❤1👀1🔥1
Performance Stability - One of those I think will give you an additional perspective on the market.⬆️ I found him a month ago on #GMX V1 after receiving notifications about whales from our BOT (For me, those are people with positions over $1 million). I almost always check these notifications, but only a few of them really catch my attention. And this wallet address is one of them. Read more on 🕊: https://twitter.c…
👍6❤1🔥1
Let's visit #Kwenta and see how the big boys are reacting before the storm hits 👀💬 With over $119.6 million in open interest volume, the majority is focusing on SHORT positions, accounting for 56.24%, with a total volume of over $67.27 million. A quick look at the top 500 open interest with the largest volume doesn't show a significant difference. 58.5% is leaning towards SHORT. There are a lot of big boys who bel…
❤7🔥2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Onchain_Trader. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“On-chain Trader Channel” (@Onchain_Trader), 153 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Onchain_Trader.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.