Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for START 7-AVGUST!!! | 0 dan Milliy sertifikatgacha | Samgin Qurbonov

Channel

START 7-AVGUST!!! | 0 dan Milliy sertifikatgacha | Samgin Qurbonov

@Onatili_webinar2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12,388subscribers

-1,440 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003993484129
TypeChannel
Username@Onatili_webinar2
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Onatili_webinar2

Growth

12,38813,82813,1087 August 2026 — 13,828 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,674 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,516 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,372 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,272 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,099 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,993 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,797 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,617 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,458 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,388 subscribers7 August 202618 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 11 days, net -1,440. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,172–14,044 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 06:3112,388-70
17 Aug 2026, 09:3712,458-159
15 Aug 2026, 19:5712,617-180
14 Aug 2026, 08:2812,797-196
12 Aug 2026, 22:1412,993-106
12 Aug 2026, 00:3313,099-173
10 Aug 2026, 23:3413,272-100
10 Aug 2026, 00:5313,372-144
9 Aug 2026, 00:5213,516-158
7 Aug 2026, 22:5713,674-154
7 Aug 2026, 00:1713,828first reading

Engagement

52 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.9%
avg views ÷ 12,388 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,960
45 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.548%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
52
of 52 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held52 (5 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total133,420
Reactions total731
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

731 reactions across 45 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
24733.8%
🔥15421.1%
💯7810.7%
🤩7510.3%
👍628.48%
😍425.75%
🤝273.69%
🎉162.19%
🥰152.05%
🏆131.78%
🫡20.274%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 731reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC≈1,160 views11 reactionsread 17 August 2026

#grammatika ⚡️ Olmoshlar otlashmaydi(mi?) O'zbek tili grammatikasiga oid 60-yillarda nashr etilgan ayrim manbalarda olmoshlarning otlashishi haqida so'z borgan, ammo keyinchalik chiqqan bir qator ilmiy ishlar buni rad etgan. Biroq negadir haligacha shu qarash ayrimlarda saqlangan yoki o'sha 60-yillarda chiqqan manbalarni qayerdadir o'qib qolib bundan "ilhomlanib" abituriyent va MSga tayyorlanuvchilarga xato ma'lum

6🔥3🎉2

16 Aug 2026, 05:32 UTC≈2,280 views28 reactionsread 17 August 2026

#esse ⚡️ Esse yozayotganda quyidagilarga jiddiy e`tibor qiling: ✅ Fikrlarni balandparvoz, jimjimador jumlalar bilan ifodalamang. Esseda hissiyot emas, obyektiv tahlil aks etishi lozim. ✅ Voqeani bayon qilishga emas, uni tahlil qilishga, munosabat bildirishga harakat qiling. Esse matnida tahlil va unga munosabat asosiy o`rinni egallashi lozim. ✅ Asosiy qismning har bir xatboshisida kamida bittadan dalil keltiring. ✅

🔥166💯3😍2🫡1

15 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC≈2,790 views23 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Mana natijam chiqibdi A daraja ustoz. Raxmat menga bergan bilimlaringiz uchun . Bundan oldingi natijam ham yomon emas edi lekin sizda o'qiganimdan keyin ancha narsani chuqurroq tushundim. Oxirgi vaqtlarda testlardan umuman muammo yo'q edi . Mehnatingizga rozi bo'ling ustoz. Ilmingiz bundanda ziyo bo'lsin.Ustoz har doim qilgan mehnatlaringiz rohatini ko'rib yuring🥹😘🥳🤲

12💯4🎉3🤩3🔥1

15 Aug 2026, 04:54 UTC≈2,670 views9 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🔔 BUGUN QABULNI OXIRGI KUNI! Kuzgi imtihon uchun eng so'nggi qabul! 👆🏻Darslar grafigi bilan tanishing • Individual nazorat bor • Esse yozish noldan o'rgatiladi • Xatolar tahlili ustida ishlaymiz • Har bir dars amaliy ko'nikmalar orqali shakllantiriladi! Siz faqat nazariya o'qib o'tirmaysiz! • doimiy nazorat va o'zlashtirish ko'rsatgichingiz platformada ko'rsatilib boriladi! ✅ Bunaqa kuchli nazorat bilan natijaga ch

7🔥1🤩1

14 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC≈2,950 views38 reactionsread 17 August 2026

#esse ⚡️ Esseda yuqori ball olishning 3 sharti! 1️⃣ Besh jihat bo`yicha umuman xato qilmasligingiz lozim: imloviy xatolar, punktuatsion xatolar, so`z va qo`shimcha qo`llash bilan bog`liq uslubiy xatolar va 12-mezon bo`yicha. Bularning barchasi esse mazmuniga emas, ko`proq shakliy tomoniga oid jihatlar. 2️⃣ Asosiy qismda har ikkala tomon qarashlari va shaxsiy qarashlar uchun 1 tadan fikr, 2 tadan argument va 1 tada

21👍7🤩4🔥3🥰2💯1

14 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC≈2,570 views9 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🤩 "Ustoz, dars a'lo darajada bo'ldi! Esseyimda ancha o'zgarish bo'lyapti" — huddi siz kabi onlaynda natija bo'larmikan deb ikkilanib kursga qo'shilgan o'quvchilarimizni fikrlari! Bugun va ertaga qabulni eng oxirgi kunlari! Undan keyin hech kim kursga qo'shila olmaydi! Uzoq vaqtga kursga qabulni yopamiz! Sertifikat olish niyatingiz jiddiy bo'lsa, hoziroq qaror qiling! Keyin kech bo'ladi! To'liq ma'lumot uchun👉🏻 h

5🤝2💯1🤩1

13 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC≈2,640 views16 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Assalomu alaykum, Ustoz!Ona tili va adabiyot fanidan milliy sertifikat imtihonida "A" darajani qoʻlga kiritdim. Bu muvaffaqiyatda sizning bergan bilimlaringiz, cheksiz mehnatingiz va qoʻllab-quvvatlovingizning oʻrni beqiyos. Menga ishonganingiz va toʻgʻri yoʻl koʻrsatganingiz uchun sizdan cheksiz minnatdorman. Mashaqqatli va sharafli mehnatingiz oldida taʼzimdaman!

🔥94👍2🥰1

13 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC≈2,650 views9 reactionsread 17 August 2026

#mumtozmatn ⚡️ Raviy haqida ayrim ma`lumotlar. Qofiyadosh so`zlar tarkibida ohangdoshlikni hosil qiluvchi raviy tovush ayrim she`rlarda bir qofiyadosh so`zning asosida, boshqasining qo`shimchasi tarkibida kelishi mumkin. Raviyning kelishida bu muhim emas, muhimi ohangdoshlikning ta`minlanishidir. Shu bois raviy haqida gap ketganda hadeb asos va qo`shimchani "tiqishtiraveradigan" ayrimlar bu ma`lumotlarni o`qib qo`y

4🔥3🤝1😍1

13 Aug 2026, 04:11 UTC≈2,750 views19 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Assalomu alaykum, Samgin Ustoz va uning fidoiy jamoasi. Mana mening natijam. Sizlardan juda minnatdorman. Sizlarda bor yoʻgʻi 45 kun taʼlim oldim. Ammo oʻrgangan bilimlarim bir olam. Kattakon rahmat. Sizlarga mustahkam salomatlik va kasbiy faoliyatingizga ulkan zafarlar tilayman.

6😍6🔥4🎉2🏆1

12 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC≈2,970 views20 reactionsread 17 August 2026

#grammatika ⚡️ Fe`llarda mayl masalasi. Fe`llarning vazifa shakllari orasida faqat sof fe`l mayl ma`nosini ifodalaydi. Harakat nomi, sifatdosh va ravishdosh mayl ma`nosiga ega emas. Masalan: Tog`dan qaytgach kiyim olish uchun bozorga tushdi. Ushbu gapda 1 ta xabar maylidagi fe`l bor: tushdi. qaytgach va olish fe`llari ravishdosh va harakat nomi bo`lgani bois mayl ifodalamaydi. Milliy sertifikatga noldan bizning na

👍94🔥3💯2🤝1🤩1

12 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC≈3,100 views7 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Sizni aslida pul emas, boshqa narsa to’xtatyapti. “Yana natija qila olmasam-chi?” “Pulim bekorga ketmasmikan?” “Hamkasblarim, oilam oldida uyalib qolsamchi...?” Lekin bir narsani unutmang. Imtihondan qo’rqib harakat qilmasangiz… 📌 Maoshingiz ham, lavozimingiz ham o’zgarmaydi. Buni o’zingiz ham bilasiz. Bizning kurs bilan esa, har qanaqasiga yutkazmaysiz! NEGA?: Chunki natija bo'lmasa, kursda qaytadan to'liq bep

5🏆1🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC≈3,270 views26 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Assalomu alaykum, hurmatli Samgin Qurbonov jamoasi, sizlarning 1,5 oylik bergan bilimingiz sababli Alloh menga A darajadagi sertifikat nasib qilib berdi, men 4 marta sertifikatga topshirib har safar test yechish texnikasida muommoga uchrar edim, lekin sizlarning kurslaringizda test tahlili va grammatika bo'yicha o'zimdagi muommolarga yechim topdim. Sizlarga ming bor tashakkur aytaman, qilgan mehnatlaringizga va bil

8🏆8🤩5🔥3💯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @Onatili_webinar2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 115,294 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“START 7-AVGUST!!! | 0 dan Milliy sertifikatgacha | Samgin Qurbonov” (@Onatili_webinar2), 12,388 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Onatili_webinar2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.