2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 456–458 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Aug 2026, 19:04
457
no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:21
457
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 May 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
339
Videos
63
Links
306
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
122 reactions across 13 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
69
56.6%
👍
53
43.4%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2022 to 17 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
شبکه اقدام علیه سموم دفع آفات در بریتانیا (Pan) با استفاده از دادههایی که دولت ماه گذشته منتشر کرد، دریافت ۱۲ قلم غذایی در معرض خطر «اثر کوکتل» بودند؛ به این معنا که مخلوط شدن چند سم با یکدیگر سطح سمی بودن مواد شیمیایی را افزایش میدهد.
مشخص شد که انگور بدترین تمام گروههای غذایی بود. به طوری که یک نمونه، شامل بقایای حداقل ۱۶ نوع سم مختلف بود. دستکم ۹۰ درصد از ۱۰۸ نمونه انگور آزمایششده حاوی چند نوع سم بودند.
گریپ…
🥬 ضرورت توجه به کشاورزی ارگانیک
بخش کشاورزی ایران شامل سرمایه اجتماعی کشاورزی و برکات چندهزارساله در شرایط مختلف اجتماعی، طبیعی و اقتصادی است؛ برای مثال میتوان به اهلی کردن ارقام گیاهی و دامی از حدود ۱۲هزار سال قبل در فلات ایران و به صرفهجویی آب در مسیر قنات اشاره کرده و سپس بر تامین سرمایههای لازم تولید در قالب نوین و در تراز بینالمللی تاکید کرد.
روشن است که بدون آب کافی و خاک مناسب، تولید حرفهای اکثر محصولات …
گلایفوزیت رایجترین علفکش در جهان و همزمان جنجالیترینِ آنهاست. از سال ۲۰۱۵، آژانس بینالمللی تحقیقات سرطان (IARC) گلایفوزیت را در دستهٔ «احتمالاً سرطانزا» طبقهبندی کرده است. مطالعات اخیر از سوی مؤسسات پژوهشی، از جمله انستیتوی ملی سلامت و تحقیقات پزشکی فرانسه (INSERM)، احتمال وجود ارتباط میان تماس با این مادهٔ شیمیایی و برخی از انواع خاص سرطان را تأیید کردهاند.
با این حال، اتحادیهٔ اروپا مجوز استفاده از گلایفوز…
جهان بدون زنبور چگونه است؟
بیستم ماه مه (۳۰ اردیبهشت) "روز جهانی زنبور" نامگذاری شده است. این مناسبت برای جشن گرفتن به وجود نیامده، بلکه برای یادآوری خطر نابودی نسل زنبورها بر روی کره زمین است.
شاید تا کنون به این فکر نکرده باشد که تیشرتی که به تن دارید یا روتختی کتانی که بر روی آن میخوابید محصول تلاش این حشرات پر سر و صدا است. اگر گرده افشانی زنبورها نباشد، پنبهای در کار نخواهد بود.
عسل تنها بخش کوچک و مفیدی از…
چرا میوهها و سبزیجات مانند گذشته مغذی نیستند؟
مطالعات متعدد نشان دادهاند که در چند دهه گذشته، میزان مواد مغذی موجود در میوهها، سبزیجات و غلات بهمیزان محسوسی کاهش یافته است.
ابی تیل، دانشمند علوم غذایی، میگوید چندین عامل در این موضوع نقش دارند، اما «کاهش کیفیت خاک» یکی از مهمترین آنها است. همانطور که ما برای رشد و سلامت به مواد مغذی نیاز داریم، گیاهان نیز به مواد مغذی کلیدی نیاز دارند.
رقیق شدن مواد مغذی (Nut…
تولید بیش از ۹۵ درصد از خوراک روزانه ما نیازمند به منابع خاک و آب است.
و #کشاورزی_ارگانیک از این منابع حیاتی حفاظت میکند.
@onbioway
❤10
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OnBioWay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@OnBioWay named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@onbiway named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@ontelnews named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“در راه ارگانیک” (@OnBioWay), 457 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OnBioWay.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.