Channel
@Olympixai
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
16subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001984893163 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Olympixai |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Olympixai |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:00 | 16 | -1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:37 | 17 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 16 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:49 | 16 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
24 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 12 | 50.0% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 45.8% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2024 to 26 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔍 Leveling Up DeFi Security with Symbolic Execution: Uncovering Hidden Vulnerabilities in Solidity Smart Contract Ecosystems. DeFi vulnerabilities are evolving, and so should our approach to uncovering them. In our latest article, we explore a game-changing tool in the Web3 security arsenal: symbolic execution. While fuzzing and formal verification dominate discussions, symbolic execution offers unmatched precisio…
🔥1
Attention Web3 developers! 💥 Olympix just published an in-depth technical analysis on the leading smart contract security strategies. This is essential reading to strengthen your security posture. The report covers: 1️⃣ Methodologies: Understand the mechanics of auditing, mutation testing, formal verification, and fuzzing. 2️⃣ Comparative Analysis: Evaluate the strengths, limitations, and appropriate use cases for…
👍2
📢 New Technical Analysis Alert Layer 2 Security: Unique Challenges and Safeguards in Rollups and Sidechains TL;DR Technical Highlights: - Analysis of bridge security implementations focusing on signature verification vulnerabilities.z - Deep dive into data availability challenges in rollup architectures. - Examination of L2-specific smart contract vulnerabilities. - Implementation patterns for cross-layer security…
👍1
📋 Technical Release: RNG Security in Smart Contracts Our security team has published an implementation guide for cryptographically secure random number generation in deterministic blockchain environments. Key technical components: 1️⃣ Vulnerability analysis of naive implementations. 2️⃣ Audited smart contract examples. 3️⃣ Cryptographic primitives comparison. 4️⃣ Gas-optimized security patterns. The analysis in…
🔥2
Hey, Web3 builders! 👋 🔐 Who said security had to be clunky? We're excited to share our latest technical analysis on session key validation - a game-changing approach to Web3 security that doesn't compromise user experience. In this comprehensive guide, we break down: ✅ How to eliminate repetitive wallet signatures. ✅ The technical architecture behind session keys. ✅ Real-world implementation strategies. ✅ Secu…
👍2
Hey, Web3 builders! 👋 @everyone We've just published a comprehensive security guide focusing on NFT smart contracts. This isn't your basic "top 10 vulnerabilities" list—we've created an in-depth resource specifically for Solidity developers and auditors. 🔍 What's Covered: - Access Control Vulnerabilities - Metadata Security - Randomness Implementation - Re-entrancy in NFT Contexts - Royalty Implementation Secu…
👋🏻 Hey, everyone! We've just published a new article that I think many of you will find useful. It's all about smart contract upgrade patterns - a topic that's becoming increasingly important as our Web3 projects grow and evolve. 🗯️ The article covers: 1️⃣ Why we need upgradeable contracts. 2️⃣ Dives into Proxy, Diamond, and Data Separation patterns. 3️⃣ The security risks each pattern introduces. 4️⃣ Best prac…
🔥1
😬 In light of the recent high-profile exchange hacks, including the BingX incident this month, we felt compelled to share our insights and strategies to help fortify our collective defenses. 🆕 We're thrilled to announce our new comprehensive Medium piece addressing one of the most critical challenges in the Wen3 industry: secure wallet key management. In the article, we dive into those nasty exchange hacks we've be…
📢 Announcing Our Latest Exploration: Governance Attack Vectors in DAOs ✅ What You'll Find in the Article 🔎 Foundational Knowledge: A primer on DAO governance mechanisms, ensuring all readers start with a solid understanding. 🔎 In-depth Analysis: Detailed examinations of four critical attack vectors: 1️⃣ Flash Loan Attacks 2️⃣ Low Participation Attacks 3️⃣ Time-Bandit Attacks 4️⃣ Governance Poisoning 🔎 Preven…
👍1
New Article Alert: "Time-Bandit Attacks: Understanding and Mitigating Blockchain Reorgs" @everyone 🔍 In this comprehensive article, we explore: 💰 The intricacies of blockchain reorganizations. 📈 How Time-Bandit attacks exploit network vulnerabilities. 🛡️ The potential risks to DeFi protocols and decentralized applications> 🧑🏫 Effective strategies for protecting against these sophisticated attacks> ⚒️ Whether…
🔥1
Just published: "Penpie Exploit: A Technical Post-Mortem Analysis" On 3rd Sept. 2024, Penpie Finance, a DeFi protocol built on top of Pendle Finance, was exploited for ~$28M in user-locked funds due to a re-entrancy vulnerability in their smart contracts. The security team at Olympix studied the exploit, traced down the attacker, and wrote a quick hack analysis. This $27.3M hack is a critical case study for DeFi dev…
👍1
We're excited to share our latest in-depth analysis on a crucial Web3 security mechanism - circuit breakers. In our new Medium article, "Circuit Breakers in Web3: A Comprehensive Analysis of DeFi's Emergency Brake," we dive deep into: ✅ The definition and historical context of circuit breakers ✅ The different types of circuit breakers used in DeFi ✅ The technical implementation and triggering mechanisms ✅ How cir…
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Olympixai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Olympix Announcement” (@Olympixai), 16 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Olympixai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.