Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
@Olga_V_Ukhanova was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
@VufDFpu3f6U0YjEy held 7 August 2026 – 7 August 2026
Growth
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net +166. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 09:39
6,835
-3
13 Sept 2026, 18:20
6,838
+12
10 Sept 2026, 01:21
6,826
+26
4 Sept 2026, 08:17
6,800
-12
31 Aug 2026, 10:57
6,812
+24
28 Aug 2026, 20:55
6,788
+64
25 Aug 2026, 22:13
6,724
+88
23 Aug 2026, 08:33
6,636
+2
20 Aug 2026, 05:34
6,634
-6
16 Aug 2026, 22:14
6,640
-2
15 Aug 2026, 16:31
6,642
+6,630
13 Aug 2026, 09:47
12
-6,652
10 Aug 2026, 07:20
6,664
-6
7 Aug 2026, 17:54
6,670
+1
7 Aug 2026, 12:47
6,669
first reading
Engagement
52 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 52 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
20m 08s
Average length
38s
Measured directly from 32 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
185 reactions across 35 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
85
45.9%
🔥
35
18.9%
👍
32
17.3%
❤🔥
16
8.65%
👏
11
5.95%
🙏
5
2.70%
🤗
1
0.541%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 185 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Родители возмущаются ЕГО объемом, дети не хотят ЕГО делать, учителя посвящают ЕМУ весь вечер. А главный вопрос так и висит в воздухе: ЗАЧЕМ МЫ ЕГО ЗАДАЕМ?
На вебинаре Инна Анатольевна ответит на ключевые вопросы.
👉СМЫСЛ. Зачем мы задаём? Где граница между пользой и вредом?
👉НОРМЫ. Что говорят СанПиН, ФГОС и ФОП НОО? Сколько можно задавать на самом деле?
👉ОЦЕНИВАНИЕ. Как проверять и оценить с пользой для всех учас…
Про разноцветную неделю расскажу немного позже. Это может быть последняя неделя учебного года для радостного его завершения или первая - для плавного перехода после летнего отдыха к учебе. По волшебной радуге мы поднимаемся в следующий класс.
На Озоне каких только нет. Даже радужный - для тех, кто захочет, как мы, порадовать детей радужной неделей!
https://ozon.ru/t/Cr7phTp
https://ozon.ru/t/hiIMWWD
https://ozon.ru/t/wE0ykFK
Дорогие коллеги, поскольку поступают вопросы по поводу канала «Первый класс - день за днём», повторю один из своих постов об этом.
Как появился этот канал?
…Вопросов от коллег поступало много: как Вам удаётся научить детей так писать, почему Ваши ученики так много знают, такие свободные и артистичные?..
И тогда я решила показывать нашу жизнь день за днём: что и как мы пишем, как разбираемся в той или иной теме, ка…
1 сентября 2 класса у нас тоже появляется торт, но другой. Торт состоит из секторов, и в каждом - предсказания на будущий год и конфеты. Детям очень нравится!
Подробно рассказываю об этом в тг-канале «Второй класс - день за днём».
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @Olga_V_Ukhanova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
УЧИТЕЛЬ ПО ПРИЗВАНИЮ @kirill_vladislavovish · 45,784 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
Учу сердцем @anna_tochka_znaniy · 51,126 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
Kate_happy_teacher @nachalka_intensiv · 42,031 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 August 2026
Моя школа лучшая! @moyashkolal · 46,712 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
️️НАЧАЛЬНАЯ ШКОЛА️️ @primaryschool72 · 33,712 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Учи началка 📚 @uchinachalka · 37,007 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
ПОРТФЕЛЬ УЧИТЕЛЯ начальных классов @umutaevaanna23 · 23,691 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 September 2026
БОНДИК 🐻 учимся вместе @bondikteacher · 36,407 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 1 September 2026
Первый учитель @uhuiuhus · 40,504 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
Началка @nachalka_v · 28,377 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 September 2026
Советские учебники @sovuche · 105,414 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
СОВУШКА @ks_sovushka · 50,209 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 August 2026
НОВАЯ НАЧАЛЬНАЯ ШКОЛА | МАТЕРИАЛЫ ДЛЯ УЧИТЕЛЯ @nnsh_materialy · 22,970 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 September 2026
Я - Учитель начальной школы @u4ebnik_schkola · 32,612 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 September 2026
🐣 🅰️ « МАРМЕЛАДКА » 🅱️ 🐥 @d_e_t_y_a_m · 40,242 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 30 August 2026
Почерк. Чистописание. Calligraphy_ok @calligraphy_ok · 22,887 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
Играй и учи @igrai_i_uchi · 24,877 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
ВПР @VPR_100 · 37,116 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026
Секреты PowerPoint @PPTSECRETS · 24,353 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 September 2026
ПЕДАГОГИ России. Библиотека бесплатных материалов @pedagog_skill · 45,359 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
Учителям началки @samoe_krutoeynas · 23,293 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026
🎓SAMSIK.PEDAGOG🎓 @samsikpedagog · 42,534 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 August 2026
Разговоры о важном. Для учителя. РОВ. Классный руководитель @razgovor_o_vagnom · 25,665 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
НАЧАЛЬНАЯ ШКОЛА 👩🏫 @More_znanii · 39,320 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 33 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ольга Уханова / О начальной школе” (@Olga_V_Ukhanova), 6,835 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Olga_V_Ukhanova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.