Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 41 days, net -69. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,651–2,772 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 16:00
2,665
-14
12 Sept 2026, 09:58
2,679
-16
8 Sept 2026, 06:57
2,695
-25
3 Sept 2026, 10:56
2,720
-20
30 Aug 2026, 21:15
2,740
-18
28 Aug 2026, 00:38
2,758
+65
25 Aug 2026, 07:43
2,693
-7
22 Aug 2026, 00:05
2,700
+27
18 Aug 2026, 10:24
2,673
-12
15 Aug 2026, 18:26
2,685
-19
12 Aug 2026, 15:54
2,704
-12
9 Aug 2026, 06:43
2,716
-15
6 Aug 2026, 16:31
2,731
-3
6 Aug 2026, 05:17
2,734
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:47
2,734
first reading
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 29 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
39m 17s
Average length
13m 06s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
200 reactions across 20 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
29
14.5%
😁
28
14.0%
❤🔥
24
12.0%
🔥
22
11.0%
🫡
14
7.00%
💔
12
6.00%
🤩
9
4.50%
👏
8
4.00%
🤔
8
4.00%
⚡
6
3.00%
🤣
6
3.00%
🥰
6
3.00%
😱
5
2.50%
💘
4
2.00%
🤝
4
2.00%
💋
3
1.50%
😭
3
1.50%
😘
2
1.00%
🦄
2
1.00%
👾
1
0.5%
4 further kinds
4
2.00%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 313 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Не хочу никого огорчать, но УК, ГК, Земельный, Жилищный и другие кодексы РФ распространяются на военных в той же мере, что и на гражданских.
Не обманывайтесь, ребята. Статус военнослужащего это не статус канонизированного святого, да и любому из нас до святости далеко. А было бы близко и регуляторы бы не понадобились
Прощайте, не ищите, я перехожу в режим хикикомори: жизнь моей старенькой машинки безвременно оборвалась — двигатель накрылся.
Ну, или ищите по видеосвязи. Покаталась и хватит.
*Да. Кто едет из Москвы на «Дронницу» и есть место в машинке — напишите в лс. ♥️
Кто-то психанул и полетел на сафари с «Балериной»50%
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Война, геополитика, технологии это конечно, хорошо.
Но, вы ничего не знаете об извращениях, если ни разу не смотрели перед сном видео «Как сварить холодец из свинины по бабушкиному рецепту» попивая томатный сок с перцем и веточкой сельдерея.
Доброй ночи. ♥️
Вспомнилось тут.
Приехала зимой из Тулы домой, в Москву. Снега навалило и не успели въезд во двор расчистить.
Плетусь с чемоданом, вижу картину: девчуля лет трёх сидит молча в сугробе задрав голову в небо, а рядом папа её уговорават:
— Машенька, пойдём домой, хватит дурачиться, замёрзнешь и мама нас будет ругать.
Машенька папу игнорирует ещё секунд 20 и потом выдаёт с очень серьёзным видом:
— Не мешай, я оператор БП…
В «Другом Ракурсе» на Mediametrics обсудили с политтехнологом Иваном Чениным что сегодня более актуально: информационные технологии или боевого применения.
Приятного просмотра ♥️
*Для тех у кого плохо работает тг ссылка на ВК 👉тут👈
Пишут, что под Екатеринбургом взорвали «одноклассника» “Овода“ по типу производимых устройств.
”Упырь” жив, в тяжёлом состоянии.
Оба производителя выпускают преимущественно ударные БПЛА.
Тот момент, когда не могут добраться до производства Геранек и решили нанести удар производствам той техники, которая применяется непосредственно на ЛБС.
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @OlgaOlegovnaTyt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кто-то психанул и полетел на сафари с «Балериной»50%
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ольга Колесник ⚙️” (@OlgaOlegovnaTyt), 2,665 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OlgaOlegovnaTyt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.