Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Олег Ткач

@OlegTka4

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,948subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001562193317
TypeChannel
Username@OlegTka4
Created12 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/OlegTka4

Growth

2,9452,9482,946.56 August 2026 — 2,945 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,945 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,948 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,945–2,948 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 12:482,948+3
6 Aug 2026, 11:032,945no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:032,945first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
50.6%
avg views ÷ 2,948 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,490
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held13 (22 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total19,400
Reactions total890
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

890 reactions across 13 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍62670.3%
😁798.88%
👎606.74%
364.04%
💊262.92%
😡192.13%
🥴151.69%
🍾111.24%
🌚70.787%
🤯70.787%
😱30.337%
😎10.112%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 890reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC≈1,160 views122 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Достойный АгитПроп! Константин Сёмин выпустил ролик (https://youtu.be/mUqIJpQgYZc), в котором убедительно показал, что цифровые технологии – это не поле нашей свободной активности, а организованные загоны. И когда надо, заботливые фермеры начинают «управлять». Материал Константина интересен тем, что показывает классовую природу этого управления в рамках подготовки к массовому забою поголовья. Это именно то, что скры

👍1086👎4😁2🍾1😎1

5 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC≈1,140 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Чтобы стать верующим, нужно сделать Бога фундаментальной ставкой для реальности, к которой привязана моя жизнь – я делать не хочу и не буду. @nonetxts

👍37👎1🥴1😁1

5 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC≈1,110 views84 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @nonetxtsPhoto

Это ответ, почему я атеист. Даже если бы Бог был, я предпочел бы увидеть ту революцию, в которой его свергнут.

👍67💊104👎2🌚1

4 Aug 2026, 20:48 UTC≈1,210 views63 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Актуальными опять стали вопросы двухлетней давности о преодолении кружковщины. Именно им посвящены поднятые из архивов заметки выше. На их основе был снят ролик, написана брошюра и сделана аудио-версия: https://t.me/OlegTka4/405. Тема важная. Нам очень хотелось бы чтобы люди, которые в неё погружаются или считают себя достойными для реализации "следующих шагов" отдавали себе отчёт в том, что делают и не повторяли ст

👍49👎8💊42

4 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTC≈1,130 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026

О кружках Ранее мы показали, как выжегается “кружковщина”. Тут расширим понятие о кружках. Кружками часто называют то, что по форме похоже на кружки — это собрания по чтению книг. В первом приближении оно так и есть, но в действительности всё по-другому. Если бы кружки были именно читальными клубами, то дело швах! Никогда и ничего из этого не выйдет. Чтение — это форма досуга, как и просмотр агитационных видео, чег

👍391

4 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC≈1,080 views58 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кое-кто говорит: «Кружковщину надо выжигать!» Но что есть кружки, чтобы так желать поскорее от них избавиться? Кружки — это ростки пролетарского сознания. Они возникают как ответ на потребность понять, что происходит и что с этим делать. Кружки формируются как низовая форма самоорганизации. Их формируют и в них вступают люди, озабоченные судьбой страны и мира. Они есть та часть общества, которая воплощает собой попы

👍495🥴3🌚1

4 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC≈1,090 views56 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @pbdsu

Да это просто люди плохие, а капитализм тут не при чём! https://youtu.be/5jXKq6CRIvU?si=HbXau9MTmfiDNv8c

👍502🌚2😱2

3 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC≈1,460 views60 reactionsread 8 August 2026

О более подробном положении дел рассказывает участник одной из сект, обобщая опыт десятков людей: https://defcon.social/@Gleb_Vorontsov/117006376373996249 По итогу можно сказать, что организации политического эксгибиционизма никуда не делись и будут дальше появляться, издеваясь над населением, которое стремится разобраться в жизни и изменить её. Если среди вас есть знакомые, которые попали в подобные секты, аккуратн

👍27👎17😁8🤯5😡2🌚1

1 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC≈1,870 views66 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mknewsruPhoto

Глава EA зарабатывает в 300 раз больше рядового сотрудника Студия опубликовала отчет за 2026-ой финансовый год. Судя по нему, средняя зарплата сотрудника EA – $126 612 в год. А вот у главы компании Эндрю Уилсона в 305 раз больше – $38 649 984. При этом за год его заработок увеличился сразу на $8.1 млн. Более того, он имеет не золотой, а скорее бриллиантовый парашют – при «квалифицированном расторжении контракта» ему

👍36😡17🍾10😁3

31 Jul 2026, 17:29 UTC≈2,000 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Децентрализованные соцсети: Fediverse и ActivityPub для чайников Если кратко, Fediverse и ActivityPub — это про децентрализованные социальные сети. А дальше нужно так много уточнений и так много примеров, что уж лучше я один раз распишу всё «от и до» здесь, чем буду снова и снова объяснять это схему друзьями и знакомым, которые в Fediverse без этих объяснений переходить почему-то пока не особо хотят, а иногда и вовс

👍382🌚2😁1

30 Jul 2026, 20:32 UTC≈1,710 views93 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @spotlight_2020Photo

«За свободу в Интернете! Против тотальных блокировок!» Кто не хотел объединения левых? Кто мешал Грудинину взобраться в президентское кресло в 2018 году?! Вот вам, выкусите мерзкие троцкисты и «трули»! Клуб «апасных каммунистов» снова в деле, да ещё и под знамёнами КПРФ, да ещё и двигает общественную дискуссию, обсуждение необоснованных и вредных блокировок проводит! Это вам не сидение на диване, не чтение книжек в

😁60👎12🥴9💊6👍5😱1

29 Jul 2026, 18:09 UTC≈2,010 views103 reactionsread 8 August 2026

С мест сообщают, в одной из организаций заставляли всех участников поочередно включать вебку... Зачем? — вопрос избыточный. Либо этой организацией руководят откровенные дураки, либо умные враги (хотя тоже не очень-то и умные, слишком топорно действуют). В том и в другом случае участвовать в такой организации — заниматься политическим самооскоплением. Враги победят дураков в любом случае, просто потому, что враги пон

👍65👎1612💊6🤯2🥴2

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @OlegTka4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 478,774 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

АГИТПРОП
@Agitblog · 109,792
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Олег Ткач” (@OlegTka4), 2,948 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OlegTka4.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.