Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 95 days, net +49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,614–8,677 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 07:20
8,670
+9
5 Nov 2026, 17:44
8,661
+2
3 Nov 2026, 00:26
8,659
+5
30 Oct 2026, 21:08
8,654
+4
28 Oct 2026, 02:56
8,650
+6
25 Oct 2026, 01:21
8,644
-2
21 Oct 2026, 14:58
8,646
-2
18 Oct 2026, 02:40
8,648
-7
15 Oct 2026, 05:49
8,655
+10
12 Oct 2026, 05:38
8,645
+1
5 Oct 2026, 23:39
8,644
-8
28 Sept 2026, 05:15
8,652
+1
18 Sept 2026, 08:42
8,651
+4
13 Sept 2026, 19:18
8,647
-13
9 Sept 2026, 17:38
8,660
-4
4 Sept 2026, 10:38
8,664
-1
1 Sept 2026, 04:05
8,665
+4
26 Aug 2026, 09:47
8,661
+2
23 Aug 2026, 13:02
8,659
+9
19 Aug 2026, 16:35
8,650
first reading
Engagement
102 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.24%
avg views ÷ 8,670 subscribers
Avg views / post
195
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 102 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
102 (25 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
3,696
Reactions total
77
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Nov 2026, 20:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
775
Videos
178
Links
160
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
31s
Average length
10s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
415 reactions across 74 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
209
50.4%
👍
88
21.2%
👏
31
7.47%
🔥
19
4.58%
😁
15
3.61%
👌
13
3.13%
😍
9
2.17%
🙏
9
2.17%
💯
8
1.93%
❤🔥
7
1.69%
🥰
5
1.20%
💔
2
0.482%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 79 of the 102 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 442 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 12 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (60.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
😍 تست خط به خط پاپالیــــــا و پروچاسکا
https://t.me/+T8TWz0L5DmxkmuBc
زنان چگونه مردان را شیفته خود می کنند
@namzadioaghd
دانلود رایگان ویس فیلم وکتاب روانشناسی
@psycology_OM
کانال پکیج رایگان کارگاههای روانشناسی
@vpsychology
فایلهای اصلاح روابط دکتر اوحدی
@psychologyservice
"خط به خط کتاب کاپلان"
@KAPLAN_SADOCKS
بانک مقالات &پایان نامه&پروپوزال روانشناسی
@Maghalate_motabar1
نیازمندیها و استخدام روانشناس و …
#نظریه_های_شخصیت
#نظریه_های_آمادگی
#روان_شناسی_فردی
#گوردون_آلپورت
#زندگی_نامه
⭐️وقتی آلپورت به ایالات متحده برگشت، بیدرنگ در برنامه دکتری هاروارد ثبتنام کرد.
⭐️او پس از گرفتن مدرک، دو سال بعدی را در اروپا گذراند و در برلین و هامبورگ، زیر نظر روانشناسان مشهوری چون ماکس ورتهایمر، ولفگانگ کُهلر، ویلیام اشترن و هاینتس ورنر مطالعه کرد.
@Oidipous
#نظریه_های_شخصیت
#نظریه_های_آمادگی
#روان_شناسی_فردی
#گوردون_آلپورت
#زندگی_نامه
🔢آلپورت هرگز آنچه را بین او و فروید گذشته بود برملا نکرد.
🔢بااینحال، آلن المز از توصیف مکتوب آلپورت درباره ادامهٔ ماجرا پرده برداشت.
🔢آلپورت این ماجرا را بارها تعریف کرد، بهندرت کلمهای از آن را تغییر داد و هرگز درباره بخش پایانی آن توضیحی نداد.
🔢پس از اینکه آلپورت متوجه شد فروید انتظار مشاورهای حرفهای را دارد، درباره نفرت خود از ک…
#نظریه_های_شخصیت
#نظریه_های_آمادگی
#روان_شناسی_فردی
#گوردون_آلپورت
#زندگی_نامه
✈️دیدار آلپورت و فروید
⭐️آلپورت طی نامهای به فروید اطلاع داد که در وین است و پیشنهاد کرد با او ملاقات کند.
⭐️ این جوان ۲۲ساله با جسارت قابلملاحظهای به خانه فروید رفت.
⭐️هنگام حرکت به سمت خانه، او فروید را در تراموا دیده بود.
⭐️آلپورت که نمیدانست درباره چه چیزی صحبت کند، ماجرای پسربچهای را نقل کرد که در تراموا از مادرش شکایت میکر…
#نظریه_های_شخصیت
#نظریه_های_آمادگی
#روان_شناسی_فردی
#گوردون_آلپورت
#زندگی_نامه
✈️پیشنهاد هاروارد و سفر به وین
⭐️پس از آن، به آلپورت در هاروارد پیشنهاد کار داده شد.
⭐️برادرش، فایت، نیز از او دعوت کرد تا با وی در وین اقامت کند؛ فایت در آنجا برای کمیسیون تجاری ایالات متحده کار میکرد.
⭐️آلپورت در وین ملاقاتی با زیگموند فروید داشت که تأثیر عمیقی بر وی گذاشت و بر دیدگاههای بعدی او درباره شخصیت تأثیر ملاحظهای داشت.
…
🔴 بعد از آزمون پرحاشیهٔ صلاحیت، تکلیف داوطلبها چی میشه؟ تازهترین خبرها و پیگیری اعتراضها اینجا 👇
https://t.me/rooeen_ravan
آموزشهای دوران نامزدی و عقد+ فایلهای آموزشی
@namzadioaghd
دانلود رایگان ویس فیلم وکتاب روانشناسی
@psycology_OM
فایلهای اصلاح روابط دکتر اوحدی
@psychologyservice
"خط به خط کتاب کاپلان"
@KAPLAN_SADOCKS
نیازمندیها و استخدام روانشناس و مشاور
@pajuheshyar
بانک مقالات &پایان نامه&پروپوزال رو…
#نظریه_های_شخصیت
#نظریه_های_آمادگی
#روان_شناسی_فردی
#گوردون_آلپورت
#زندگی_نامه
🌟آلپورت در سال ۱۹۱۹ مدرک کارشناسی خود را در رشتههای فلسفه و اقتصاد دریافت کرد، اما هنوز مسیر آیندهٔ شغلیاش قطعی نبود.
👤گذراندن واحدهایی در روانشناسی و علم اخلاق اجتماعی اثری ماندگار بر جای گذاشت.
📍 او با پذیرش پیشنهاد تدریس در رابرت کالج استانبول، سال تحصیلی ۱۹۱۹ تا ۱۹۲۰ را در ترکیه به آموزش زبان انگلیسی و جامعهشناسی گذراند؛ تجربه…
#نظریه_های_شخصیت
#نظریه_های_آمادگی
#روان_شناسی_فردی
#گوردون_آلپورت
#زندگی_نامه
🌟خانواده تا پیش از ششسالگی گوردون، سهبار نقل مکان کردند و در نهایت در کلیولند اوهایو ساکن شدند.
🌟آلپورت از همان دوران کودکی نشانههایی از انزواگزینی و گرایش به مسائل فلسفی و مذهبی بروز داد؛ به طوری که مهارتهای بیانیاش بر تواناییهای بازی و تحرک او غلبه داشت.
📦با وجود فارغالتحصیلی با رتبهٔ دوم از میان صد دانشآموز، خود را دانشآموزی…
#نظریه_های_شخصیت
#نظریه_های_آمادگی
#روان_شناسی_فردی
#گوردون_آلپورت
#زندگی_نامه
❤گوردون ویلارد آلپورت در ۱۱ نوامبر ۱۸۹۷ در مونتزوما، ایندیانا متولد شد.
🎤او چهارمین و آخرین فرزند خانواده بود. پدرش پزشک بود و از آنجا که مطب مناسبی نداشت، خانه را به درمانگاهی کوچک تبدیل کرده بود؛ فضایی آکنده از حضور بیماران و پرستاران که جوی استریل و پاکیزه داشت.
📤 این تأکید بر تمیزی جسمانی، در ذهن آلپورت به پاکیزگی تفکر نیز تعمیم یا…
#نظریه_های_شخصیت
#نظریه_های_آمادگی
#روان_شناسی_فردی
#گوردون_آلپورت
#زندگی_نامه
👤این رویارویی جرقهای شد که علاقه به نظریهٔ شخصیت را در او شعلهور کرد.
✈️وقتی آلپورت به ایالات متحده بازگشت، به این فکر افتاد که آیا امکان دارد جایی برای رویکرد سومی به شخصیت وجود داشته باشد؛ رویکردی که از روانکاوی مرسوم و نظریههای یادگیری اقتباسشده از مطالعهٔ حیوانات بهره گرفته باشد.
🎓 آلپورت بیدرنگ تحصیلات خود را برای دریافت Ph…
❤6
Signed آرش طالب وند
Showing the 12 most recent of 102 posts we hold for @Oidipous. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Oidipous edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 7 posts on @Oidipous as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
33 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
5
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 64 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
پُرتال فیلم و کلیپ روانشناسی @PsyPortalMovie · 19,481 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 3 October 2026
" کاپلان و سادوک " @KAPLAN_SADOCKS · 21,010 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 September 2026
کتابهای روانشناسی و روانپزشکی @psyologistravanbook · 23,214 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026
روانشناسی و پزشکی @matlabravanshenasi · 25,418 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 September 2026
کتابخانه دانشگاهی @Academic_Library · 144,470 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
جارچی روانشناسی:اخبار-استخدامی.کارگاه @salimigroup1394 · 21,648 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 September 2026
کارگاههای آسیب شناسی dsm5 @psychologyservice · 21,791 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 September 2026
MAD MAX @MAADMAX365 · 38,017 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
انجمن روان شناسی تربیتی ایران @iranedupsyasso · 25,840 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 September 2026
کاپلانخوانی @kaplansadockk · 37,510 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
پُرتال کتاب و جزوات روانشناسی @PsyPortalBook · 35,442 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“" نظریههای شخصیت "” (@Oidipous), 8,670 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Oidipous.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.