tes

Channel
ππ πβ€ΝΝΝΝππππππππ ππππππ
@Officialluminousgen
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
359subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002480666427 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Officialluminousgen |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Officialluminousgen |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 359 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 359 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 September 2025 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3m 07s
- Average length
- 47s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Recent posts
β‘ β β² β’β’ β πiked by LUMINOUS LEGEND and 298.899 others SPESIAL TAG β @bu11slut @ycvukim @ttampanvx @alcyone_kaylgh @a1th4it4r @slnctk @mmrioes @Traleotra @elkarlz @Kazeyon @Cheenmayii @er_reygan πiew all 176.290 comments 7 minutes ago - see translation ββββββββββββββββββββ β β β β‘
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
β‘ β β² β’β’ β πiked by LUMINOUS LEGEND and 298.899 others SPESIAL TAG β @dlvinin @JennieKimmr @iPdmanT @Juliettenoireb @qSmacker @HOTBOZSEX @ipcdkbkp @luwcyraa @luzzcynnaa @cy10zzzz @kesayanganmarkutet @bndr_bkp @kioristela @thurtele πiew all 176.290 comments 7 minutes ago - see translation ββββββββββββββββββββ β β β β‘
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
πππ ππππ Luminous Legend β "Kami bukan sekadar nama, kami legenda yang lahir dari kegelapan. Kami berdiri, bukan untuk tunduk. Kami melangkah, bukan untuk berhenti. Siapa pun yang mencoba menghalangi akan merasakan bayangan kami, dan siapa pun yang mencoba menjatuhkan akan terbakar oleh cahaya kami. Kami tak butuh keributan, tapi jangan salahβkami takkan diam bila terusik. Bersatu sebagai keluarga, bergerak sebagβ¦
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Officialluminousgen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank β 1,183,697 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 19
- handles named in this channelβs posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 19
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Officialluminousgen named 19 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππ πβ€ΝΝΝΝππππππππ ππππππβ (@Officialluminousgen), 359 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Officialluminousgen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.