Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Valhalla Leaks (Official)

Channel

Valhalla Leaks (Official)

@OfficialValhallaLeaks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

875subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001780090741
TypeChannel
Username@OfficialValhallaLeaks
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live20 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 20 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/OfficialValhallaLeaks

Growth

8758798777 August 2026 — 879 subscribers7 August 2026 — 879 subscribers13 August 2026 — 878 subscribers20 August 2026 — 875 subscribers7 August 202620 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 14 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 874–880 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Aug 2026, 23:43875-3
13 Aug 2026, 16:28878-1
7 Aug 2026, 02:10879no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:47879first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 4 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

406 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥13934.2%
13433.0%
❤‍🔥358.62%
🤩338.13%
194.68%
👍143.45%
😍102.46%
👏81.97%
🏆51.23%
🥰51.23%
🎉40.985%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 406reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 December 2025 to 22 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jun 2026, 21:03 UTC782 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

12🤩54

22 Jun 2026, 21:02 UTC885 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

115🔥5🥰1

14 May 2026, 18:25 UTC≈3,260 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥117😍5

4 May 2026, 14:29 UTC≈3,310 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Farming coming soon to Valhalla! 🥳

🔥21🎉4👏41

28 Apr 2026, 14:12 UTC≈2,510 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

11🔥6👍4

22 Apr 2026, 16:10 UTC≈2,840 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥98🔥8🥰3

31 Mar 2026, 08:57 UTC≈4,600 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

12🔥7😍5

25 Mar 2026, 11:36 UTC≈4,320 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥1510🏆5❤‍🔥1

17 Mar 2026, 12:23 UTC≈3,470 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

12🔥6🤩5

6 Mar 2026, 14:13 UTC≈3,830 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

11🔥5🤩5

6 Mar 2026, 14:13 UTC≈3,620 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

8🔥6👍3🤩2

13 Feb 2026, 09:10 UTC≈5,480 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

10🤩7🔥3🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @OfficialValhallaLeaks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 611,104 of 1,584,733entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Floki & TokenFi 中文社区入口
@flokiinuchina · 210,959
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 August 2026
Btok News
@BtokMedia · 304,228
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Valhalla Leaks (Official)” (@OfficialValhallaLeaks), 875 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OfficialValhallaLeaks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.