Channel
@OfficialAbelianAnnouncements
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
297subscribers
-60 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002230021504 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OfficialAbelianAnnouncements |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OfficialAbelianAnnouncements |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 13:38 | 297 | -2 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 02:40 | 299 | -3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:01 | 302 | -4 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 16:41 | 306 | -16 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:57 | 322 | -10 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 332 | -11 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:06 | 343 | -14 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 357 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 357 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
134 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 43 | 32.1% | |
| ❤ | 37 | 27.6% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 16.4% | |
| 👏 | 15 | 11.2% | |
| ⚡ | 7 | 5.22% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 2.99% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.49% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.746% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.746% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.746% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.746% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 9 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 🧠 #TechTuesday | Quantum AI Just Cleared Another Milestone ⚛️🤖 Scientists have successfully trained an AI model using an @IBM quantum computer, and the quantum-enhanced version answered certain questions correctly that the classical base model could not. Their breakthrough: Highlighted early potential for quantum-enhanced AI systems Post-quantum concerns highlight that: • Quantum applications are expandin…
❤5👍2👏1🔥1
🔥🔥🔥 Most projects optimize for attention. #Abelian optimizes for durability. ⚡ Post-quantum cryptography 🔐 Privacy-focused architecture ⛏️ Decentralized mining infrastructure Because the next era of #blockchain requires more than narratives. It requires survival. 🔗Let's Keep Building | Like, Repost & Comment on 𝕏: https://x.com/PQabelian/status/2063827701384065147
❤3🔥2👍1💯1
⭐️ Why Become an Abelian Ambassador? Abelian is growing fast and we are building a blockchain designed to stay secure against future quantum threats. As an ambassador, you are not just supporting you are becoming part of the movement early. Here’s why you should join: 👉 Be part of a fast-growing quantum-secure ecosystem 👉 Get early recognition in the Abelian community 👉 Build your personal presence in Web3 👉 Conn…
❤1👍1👏1💯1🔥1
🔥🔥🔥 🚨 Abelian Ambassador Program We are opening a new way for builders, creators, and community leaders to get involved and be recognized in the ecosystem. If you have been contributing, supporting, or building around the quantum-secure ecosystem, this is for you. If you want to become an ambassador: 👉 Join our official Discord: https://discord.gg/pS4ypYmw2 👉 Finish the task: https://x.com/PQabelian/status/20621…
❤2👏2🔥1🥰1😁1
🔥🔥🔥 🔐 Is Money Truly Quantum Safe? Featured on J.DB-R — The Jame DiBiasio Report, Abelian Co-Founder Dr. Duncan Wong shares his insights on one of the most important questions facing digital finance today. ⚛️ As quantum computing advances, the conversation is no longer just about protecting Bitcoin. The same cryptography secures digital banking, stablecoins, tokenized assets, and blockchain infrastructure worldwid…
❤3👍2👏1💯1🔥1
🔥🔥🔥 ⚡ #Abelian | Smarter Address Visibility Wallet addresses should be readable, clear, and secure. The latest Abelian App update improves address visibility across the app experience: 🔹 ABEL addresses now display: First 10 + Last 4 characters 🔹 Ethereum addresses now display: First 4 + Last 4 characters Both are highlighted in bold blue for faster verification and improved readability. 🔐 Small interface improve…
👌2⚡1❤1👏1🔥1
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 🧠 #TechTuesday | Can #Bitcoin Really Migrate to Quantum Safety? BTQ has introduced a Bitcoin Quantum testnet with BIP 360, aiming to bring quantum-resistant transaction models to Bitcoin. The approach focuses on reducing public key exposure and testing post-quantum structures in a live environment. Their approach: • Reduce exposure of public keys (P2MR) • Introduce quantum-resistant transaction formats • E…
🔥3❤1🤔1
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⚛️ #Abelian101 | What Makes A Post-Quantum Asset Different? Not all digital assets are built for the quantum era. Traditional blockchain security may eventually face new computational risks. That changes how we think about: ➤ Privacy ➤ Ownership ➤ Long-term security $ABEL integrates post-quantum cryptography directly into the network architecture to help prepare for the next evolution of blockchain infras…
❤2👍1🔥1
🔥🔥🔥 ⚛️ Abelian Emerges as a Leading Post-Quantum Blockchain As quantum computing moves from distant theory to real industry concern, the question in crypto is changing: Who is actually prepared? Abelian was cited as an active implementation of post-quantum cryptography within a live blockchain environment, while its work has also gained attention across major crypto media and industry platforms. From lattice-base…
❤2🔥2⚡1👏1
🔥🔥🔥 Will Quantum Computing break #Bitcoin and #Blockchain? ⚛️ #FTAHK (FinTech Association of Hong Kong) will be hosting the panel: “Risks and Myths of Quantum Computing for Blockchains” Abelian Co-founder @DrDuncanWong will be joining experts from Galaxy, Aon, Matrixport, and more to discuss: 🔐 Post-Quantum Security & Privacy ⚡ Quantum Risks to Blockchain Resilience 🧠 The Future of Cryptographic Infrastructure & Di…
👍2🔥2⚡1💯1
⏰ Reminder | AMA 𝕏 Live | #Abelian x SuperEx Join us later today for a live discussion on: 🔐 Privacy ⚡ Blockchain Security ⚛️ The Future of Post-Quantum Technology Featuring: 🎙️ Kevin — Head of Business Development, SuperEx 🎙️ Allison — Chief Marketing Officer, Abelian 🎙️ Moderator — Community Team, Abelian 📅 28 May 2026 (Thursday) 🕦 11:30 PM (GMT+8) Set your reminder and join us live: https://x.com/i/spaces/1pJkO…
🔥3⚡1❤1
🔥🔥🔥 ⚛️ A HackerNoon blog featuring quantum-resistant blockchain projects highlighted #Abelian and Dr. Duncan Wong’s perspective on the future of post-quantum infrastructure. 🔐 As conversations around quantum computing continue expanding, Abelian remains focused on building blockchain infrastructure designed for long-term cryptographic resilience. The quantum era may arrive faster than expected. Preparation matters.…
👍3🔥3👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OfficialAbelianAnnouncements. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@OfficialAbelianAnnouncements named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Abelian Announcement Channel” (@OfficialAbelianAnnouncements), 297 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OfficialAbelianAnnouncements.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.