Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Очки Дурова

Channel

Очки Дурова

@OchkiPaulDurova

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

63subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002710562908
TypeChannel
Username@OchkiPaulDurova
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 11 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/OchkiPaulDurova

Growth

6367657 August 2026 — 67 subscribers10 August 2026 — 67 subscribers16 August 2026 — 66 subscribers24 August 2026 — 64 subscribers9 September 2026 — 63 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 32 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62–68 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 03:5563-1
24 Aug 2026, 17:4864-2
16 Aug 2026, 04:3866-1
10 Aug 2026, 01:1667no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:5867first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 11 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

28 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54561490492142490601450.0%
517.9%
custom 5258419805857284819310.7%
custom 5258444506214202766310.7%
custom 546985837436969263827.14%
custom 545170998576546863213.57%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2025 to 13 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Sept 2025, 13:23 UTC176 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ClyukshipPhoto

Добрый день дорогие подписчики телеграм каналов Clyuk and W1_yyy, Очки Дурова и Рюкзак Дурова!!! Проводим розыгрыш на 10 мишек) Условия: 1. Быть подписанным на: 1)Очки Дурова 2)Clyuk and W1_yyy 3)Рюкзак Дурова 2. Поставить реакции на данные посты

custom 545614904921424906012custom 52584445062142027663custom 54517099857654686321

13 Sept 2025, 11:47 UTC193 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

У кого есть активные тгк канали с нфт тематикой, отпишите в лс @BetterGarant3, мб куплю у вас клики / или сделаем вз конкурс

custom 54561490492142490601

13 Sept 2025, 11:00 UTC111 viewsread 10 August 2026

🎉 Розыгрыш завершен! 🏆 Победители: 1. @VkSleser 2. @Sotoro_goio 🔍 Проверить результаты

13 Sept 2025, 07:22 UTC101 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ну а подарки тоже нас радуют хорошим ростом 🕯 Больше всего % дали : 🥇 Jingle Bells 🔼 🥈 Skull Flower 🔼 🥉 Eternal Candle 🔼 🎁Ochki Paul Durova🎁

12 Sept 2025, 19:09 UTC88 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Конкурс на 2 мишки 🎁! Подписка на : @RukzackDurova @OchkiPaulDurova Итоги 13.09 в 14:00 по МСК🎁

12 Sept 2025, 17:09 UTC66 viewsread 10 August 2026

🎉 Розыгрыш завершен! 🏆 Победители: 1. @l0shp 🔍 Проверить результаты

12 Sept 2025, 17:02 UTC55 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Розыгрыш на 5 🎁 ! Условия : Подписка на данный тгк Итоги в 22:00🎁

12 Sept 2025, 16:13 UTC56 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

@monk ( Павел Дуров ) опубликовал пост в своем тгк @durov, о недавном происшествии с Чарли Кирк. Перевод Смерть @charliekirk — это нападение на свободу слова. Он боролся за открытую дискуссию, и враги истины ненавидели его за это. Свобода слова подвергается нападкам во всем мире. Как только свобода слова теряется, все остальные свободы вскоре следуют за ней. Мы должны продолжить миссию Чарли по её защите ✉️

12 Sept 2025, 16:09 UTC55 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

1 мишка 1 час Подписка на данный тгк @OchkiPaulDurova

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @OchkiPaulDurova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Очки Дурова” (@OchkiPaulDurova), 63 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OchkiPaulDurova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.