Channel
@ObligateAG
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
85subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003071198792 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ObligateAG |
| Description | 🌐 Obligate Building trust and efficiency on-chain. 🔗Website: obligate.com 💼LinkedIn: linkedin.com/company/obligatecom ✍️Medium: obligate.medium.com 🕊️X: x.com/obligatecom |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ObligateAG |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 85 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 85 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 79 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 7 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
106 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 30 | 28.3% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 28.3% | |
| 🏆 | 16 | 15.1% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 12.3% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 10.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 2.83% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 1.89% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.943% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Obligate made it into the RWA Landscape 2026 map, under Debt / Corporate 🙌 Big takeaway from the report: smart contracts can cut a lot of the cost of admin work behind an asset — issuance, subscriptions, redemptions, records. That's the problem we're solving. Worth a read 👉 RWAs: The Logical Conclusion of Stablecoins
❤1🏆1
📢 Obligate, together with XBTO and IQ-EQ, and with Eiffel Investment Group as investment adviser to the underlying strategy, completes a pioneering fully native digital asset issuance providing exposure to real asset-backed private credit investments. The eNotes™ are backed by short-term financings secured by real assets across the UK, Germany, Spain and Ireland, dedicated to professional investors. Issued via the …
🔥5❤2
oTFY is now live on Solana🚀 $200M in trade-finance RWAs, fully composable within DeFi — built as high-grade collateral in Solana's lending markets. The asset is no longer a passive on-chain receipt. It becomes working capital inside a living financial system. 📖 Read more: Solana
🔥5🏆3
🏆 Big news: Obligate has won Best Tokenisation Platform: Raising Capital for SMEs at the Future of Finance Awards 2026! The award recognises our work making on-chain capital markets genuinely accessible to SMEs with real live issuances, institutional-grade compliance, and full support for issuers who previously had no route to capital markets. A big thank you to our Chairman James Courtenay and Head of Operations L…
🏆6🔥6❤1❤🔥1👏1
Our Co-Founder Benedikt joined Circle's Builders Series to talk about why debt capital markets are being rebuilt onchain — from paper coupons in 2024 to fully onchain EURC-denominated bonds. 🔗Watch here: YouTube
🔥1
Matthias Wyss sat down with Johnny Reinsch from the Tokenized Asset Coalition to talk about how Obligate has rewired century-old debt capital markets with cutting-edge technology and legal infrastructure. 🎙 Watch the full podcast here
🔥2
🥂 Point Zero Aperitivo — Zürich We're co-hosting an evening with Canton Network, A&M Crypto and Ledger during Point Zero Forum. Drinks, real conversations, and the people building the next chapter of finance. 📅 Tue 23 June 2026 🕔 17:00–20:00 CET 📍 Zürich 👉 https://luma.com/cowi4tc0 📌Business email required
👏6
Obligate is integrating Dfns as our new wallet infrastructure🤝 Programmable wallets, multi-chain coverage, and institutional-grade security across our full issuance lifecycle. 🔗Read more: Obligate x Dfns
🔥4❤1🤩1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
🥇 Obligate won 1st place at Unicorn Pitches Zurich! Big thanks to Matthias Wyss for presenting us on stage. 🚀
👏6🏆3❤🔥2🔥1
🔥 Team update at Obligate! Sam Saidi is our new Business Development Associate. 📈 Ready to drive growth and open new doors in on-chain capital markets. Congrats, Sam! 🚀
👍5❤2🎉2👏2🏆1
🔥 Team update at Obligate! Darcy Edward Dodds steps up as Partnership Manager. 🤝 From building key relationships to driving growth, he's ready to take our partnerships to the next level. Congrats, Darcy! 🚀
👏5❤3🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ObligateAG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,017,173 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Obligate” (@ObligateAG), 85 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ObligateAG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.