Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for OBJECTUM𝗮𝗻𝗱TECHNOPHILIA ᴄᴏɴꜰᴇꜱꜱɪᴏɴ

Channel

OBJECTUM𝗮𝗻𝗱TECHNOPHILIA ᴄᴏɴꜰᴇꜱꜱɪᴏɴ

@ObjectumTechnophiliaConfession

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

14subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004488475353
TypeChannel
Username@ObjectumTechnophiliaConfession
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 17 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ObjectumTechnophiliaConfession

Growth

131413.512 Aug 2026, 22:32 — 13 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 22:45 — 13 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 11:23 — 14 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 22:3213 Aug 2026, 11:23
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13–14 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:2314+1
12 Aug 2026, 22:4513no change
12 Aug 2026, 22:3213first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
79.6%
avg views ÷ 14 subscribers
Avg views / post
11.2
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held20 (17 July 202622 July 2026)
Views total223
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 22:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
54s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓360.0%
240.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 02:41 UTC19 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @pcconfessionPhoto

# PC_CONFESSIONS.log description: твой уголок оверклокинга, сборок и железных проблем. здесь можно делиться всем, что связано с пк: от удачного андервольтинга до сгоревших видях. залетай, хвастайся сетапом, или проси совета! admins: vibesomuch: { role: владелец, pronoun: он } sonata: { role: вп, pronoun: она } navigation: - правила тейков - бот для предложки - наш чат - вп пост [0+] b

20 Jul 2026, 18:35 UTC20 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @PoliGragus_CfPhoto

───୨ৎ────────୨ৎ────────୨ৎ─── Любите Полиградусы? Хотите поделиться творчеством с шипом, или просто поглазеть на них? Вам к нам • ВП пост • навигация • ───୨ৎ────────୨ৎ────────୨ৎ───

20 Jul 2026, 18:35 UTC17 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @grimeXavBaPhoto

───୨ৎ────────୨ৎ────────୨ৎ─── Cr: @Varenik_zzz Хотите поделиться творчеством по грайму? (•ˋ _ ˊ•) Или просто посмотреть по нему артики и видео с фанфиками? (。•́‿ •̀。) А может, просто весело провести время в чате? ૮₍´。ᵔ ꈊ ᵔ。`₎ა Тут вы найдете это без труда, ведь это... C O N F S S I O N G R I M E ВП пост :: 💿 Навигация :: 💿 ───୨ৎ────────୨ৎ────────୨ৎ───

20 Jul 2026, 18:35 UTC14 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @harleyxplayersuperPhoto

Вам нравится пейринг Доктора и Игрока из ППТ, но вам катастрофически не хватает по ним контента? Может, вы сами хотите поделиться контентом по данному пейринг? Или же вам не с кем обсудить ваш гиперфикс на них? В таком случае, добро пожаловать в Securityangel Confession! Здесь, вы можете поделиться контентом по вашему любимому пейрингу, найти его, или же обсудить с единомышленниками! В общем, безопасное место для л

20 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC11 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

cr lexi.aka.opaline on TikTok ObjectumAndTechnophiliaConfession / 𝙏𝙖𝙠𝙚𝙗𝙤𝙩 #Адмтейк

1🍓1

20 Jul 2026, 14:04 UTC10 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

cr janeheartzme on TikTok ObjectumAndTechnophiliaConfession / 𝙏𝙖𝙠𝙚𝙗𝙤𝙩 #Адмтейк

1🍓1

19 Jul 2026, 13:25 UTC11 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ρⲧ ᥒ𐔖ᥴⲧυⲕ=3 🗣️: я ɥ𐔤ⲃᥴⲧⲃ𐔤ю ᥴᥱⳝя ⲏᥱⲏ𐔤ⲿⲏыⲙ! 🗣️: ⲕᥲⲕ ᥒᥱρᥱᥴⲧᥲⲧь ρ€ⳅ@ⲧьᥴя?.. 🗣️: ρ𐔖ⲇυⲧᥱ᥈υ ⲙᥱⲏя ⲏᥱ ᥈юⳝяⲧ, ⲙⲏᥱ ⲏᥱ ᥴ ⲕᥱⲙ 𐔖ⳝպᥲⲧьᥴя... ⲧᥱⳝя ⳝᥱᥴᥒ𐔖ⲕ𐔖яⲧ ⲙ𐔖ρᥲ᥈ьⲏыᥱ ᥒρ𐔖ⳝ᥈ᥱⲙы, ⲏ𐔖 ⲧы ⲏυɥᥱ𐔏𐔖 ⲏᥱ ⲙ𐔖ⲿᥱɯь ᥴⲇᥱ᥈ᥲⲧь ᥴ ⲉⲧυⲙ?🪻 ⲧы ⳝ𐔖υɯьᥴя ρᥲᥴᥴⲕᥲⳅᥲⲧь ⳅⲏᥲⲕ𐔖ⲙыⲙ υ᥈υ ρ𐔖ⲇⲏыⲙ?🌷 ⲧ𐔖𐔏ⲇᥲ ⲧᥱⳝᥱ ᥒ𐔖 ᥒ𐔤ⲧυ.🍏 ᥕᥱᥣᥴ𐔖ⲙᥱ t𐔖... 𝙋𝙨𝙮𝙘𝙝𝙤𝙡𝙤𝙜𝙮 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙛𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣! ⲙы ᥒ𐔖ⲙ𐔖ⲿᥱⲙ ⲧᥱⳝᥱ, ⲕᥲⲕ ⲧ𐔖᥈ьⲕ𐔖 ᥴⲙ𐔖ⲿᥱⲙ.🌷 ⲧы ⲙ𐔖ⲿᥱɯь ρᥲᥴᥴⲕᥲⳅᥲⲧь 𐔖 ᥴⲃ𐔖ᥱύ ᥒρ𐔖ⳝ᥈ᥱⲙы ⲃ ⲏᥲɯυⲭ ⲧᥱύⲕᥲⲭ, ⲧᥱⳝᥱ ⲃᥴᥱ𐔏ⲇᥲ ᥒ𐔖ⲙ𐔖𐔏𐔤ⲧ!🪻

19 Jul 2026, 13:20 UTC10 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @milevenconfessionPhoto

⭐😔😎 🖱 🌟🌟 💕 нравится такая пара как милевен?? хочешь найти больше контента по ним? 🌟🌟 💕henn . . . 🥹 🥹@milevenconfession 💙navigaton 🫂vp post

19 Jul 2026, 13:15 UTC10 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @travelingconfessionPhoto

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🕶➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🥥-💕 побывала в 20 странах и городах, но мне некому рассказать..🐡 🍉-💕 так обожаю путешествия и очень хочу найти контент от других людей и рассказать о своих путешествиях !! 🐚-💕 хочу про рекламировать свой тгк о путешествиях и влогах, но не знаю где ➖➖ ➖➖➖ 🤩⭐️⭐️🤩🤩🤩🤩 Nav ⭐️⭐️🤩🤩🤩🤩 🥹 🥹🥹🥹 В нашем кф вы увидите много контента по путешествиям

19 Jul 2026, 13:10 UTC8 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @skibidinettPhoto

🫐 ➿➿ ➿➿ ➿➿ ➿➿ 🔊🔠🔠🔠 — Я так люблю 🔤🔤❕ Но не могу найти единомышленников. . . 🎥🔠🔠🔠 — Не думал, что обычный мем станет целым сериалом! Интересно, а есть ли сетка по нему. . . 🌟🌟🌟 🅰️𝓮𝓵𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓮 𝓽𝓸 . . . 💭💭 ⤵ 🚽 🌟🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤. nett ⚡️⚡️⚡️🚽 👤🔠🔠🔠 — А чᴛᴏ ᴛᴀᴋᴏᴇ ᴄᴇᴛᴋᴀ❓ это формат коллективного ролевого пр

19 Jul 2026, 13:05 UTC9 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Legori_shopPhoto

ⲧы υᥴⲕᥲ᥈ 𐔏ⲇᥱ ⲙ𐔖ⲿⲏ𐔖 ⲕ𐔤ᥒυⲧь ᥒρ𐔖ⲕᥲɥⲕ𐔤 υ᥈υ ⲃ𐔖᥈юⲧ𐔤 ⲃ ᥒ𐔖ᥒ𐔤᥈яρⲏыⲭ υ𐔏ρᥲⲭ? ⲧ𐔖𐔏ⲇᥲ ⲧᥱⳝᥱ ⲧ𐔖ɥⲏ𐔖 ⲕ ⲏᥲⲙ! 𝑊𝑒𝑙𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑡𝑜... 𝐋𝐄𝐆𝐎𝐑𝐈 𝐒𝐇𝐎𝐏! ⲃ ⲏⲁɯⲉⲙ ⲕⲁⲏⲁⲗⲉ ⲉⲥⲧь ⲏⲁⲕⲟⲡⲗⲉⲏυⲉ ⲕⲩⳝⲕⲟⲃ υ ⲙⲏⲟⲅⲟ ⲃⲥяⲕυⲭ ⲡⲣⲟⲕⲁɥⲉⲕ ⲃ ⲣⲟⳝⲗⲟⲕⲥⲉ! ~|Навигация|~ Влд: @MevriVee

19 Jul 2026, 13:05 UTC9 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @techniqueconfessionPhoto

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 👨‍💻: Блять, комп не включается, что делать? 👩‍💻: Какая-то херня с телефоном, что делать? 👨‍💻: *фото* вылезает такая ошибка, хз, что делать! Знакомо? Тогда вам точно к нам! ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 📃🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 📃Добро пожаловать в техника конфешен! В этом конфешене вы можете задать интересующий вас вопрос по технике, а так же помочь другим. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🅰️🔤🔤🔤🔤 Бот для тейков: @te

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ObjectumTechnophiliaConfession. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,404,530 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OBJECTUM𝗮𝗻𝗱TECHNOPHILIA ᴄᴏɴꜰᴇꜱꜱɪᴏɴ” (@ObjectumTechnophiliaConfession), 14 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ObjectumTechnophiliaConfession.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.