Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Пристанище Активиста

Channel

Пристанище Активиста

@Obitel_Aktivista

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

569subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001701285919
TypeChannel
Username@Obitel_Aktivista
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Obitel_Aktivista

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5675755716 August 2026 — 575 subscribers6 August 2026 — 575 subscribers13 August 2026 — 570 subscribers20 August 2026 — 571 subscribers26 August 2026 — 567 subscribers2 September 2026 — 573 subscribers10 September 2026 — 571 subscribers18 September 2026 — 569 subscribers5696 August 202618 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 43 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 566–576 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 20:57569-2
10 Sept 2026, 23:21571-2
2 Sept 2026, 16:28573+6
26 Aug 2026, 22:33567-4
20 Aug 2026, 06:17571+1
13 Aug 2026, 03:03570-5
6 Aug 2026, 18:03575no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:07575first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

195 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6432.8%
🔥5528.2%
❤‍🔥3417.4%
2814.4%
😱94.62%
💘21.03%
😁21.03%
👏10.513%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 195 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC53 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Я заколеровала лак морилкой... Хотя у меня и не дерево а пвх, за то не нужно покупать колер. Вообще этот лайфхак пришел ко мне от знакомого реставратора мебели, оч кайфовый (для дерева уже использовала, щас тестим). Подкрашиваю углы, так как самоклящаяся плитка очень дешёвая и когда пришла, оказалось, что она очень бледная. Так что колерую пока углы, но вообще ощущение, что ее всю надо фигачить этой смесью морилки и

🔥72

6 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC73 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Я планирую повторять референс от нейросети полностью, за исключением узора на экране и "столешницы" сверху. Там я буду делать мозаику по этому референсу: Я уже даже купила аппарат для колки стекла и керамики, который используют мастера-мозаичисты 😁. Буду раскалывать плитку (это так приятно!!! Я думала, она типа твердая и ее же режут циркуляркой дофига времени, но РАСКАЛЫВАЕТСЯ она просто за секунду!!!) Мне ещё второй

5😁1

6 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC74 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Я тут к своему удивлению обнаружила, что золотых экранов на батарею с резным декором вообще никто не делает... Неужели нельзя сделать шикарнейшим свой радиатор?? Отсутствие примеров говорит либо о том что я что-то делаю не так и идея тупейшая, либо о том, что я гений Да, так криво выглядят почти все мои эскизы. Я правда умею нормально рисовать планы и тп, но так я экономлю время, и главное же что мне все понятно 😂😂😂

❤‍🔥62😁1

6 Aug 2026, 05:34 UTC62 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @olvads

Posted without readable text

6❤‍🔥3🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 04:27 UTC80 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

То есть это типа норм что я на 24 месте из 24 на факультет мечты в УрФУ, и в один прекрасный день захожу, а бюджетных мест вдруг стало 18 а не 24?

😱92

5 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC94 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, кто придет на Азию смотреть наше дефиле с Инки в первый день?)) Пишите! 👇👇👇 анонс чуть позже))

🔥176

4 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC256 views51 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⚡️😯👍🌟🅰️🔠🔤🔤👍🙄 🤩🔠🅰️🔤🔠🔤🔤🔠🤩🎮 😊😊➿➿🤩🎮🤩➿➿😊😊 ✨Olvads • Photographer 😊 Помощники⭐️😊 • https://t.me/linjaai • https://t.me/rizhvika #пост #косплей

2812🔥11

4 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC129 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

➿🤩🥰🌟🅰️🌟🅰️🤩➿ 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊 Если ж осенят тебя блаженство и отрада, Знай, что дело плохо, и скорей беги к врачу. Да нет, не надо, я шучу. 🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸 🖋Естественно, чтобы воздать дань моему нелюбимому произведению русской классической литературы(☺️), во второй день Азии я буду выступать в блоке РУССКОГО ДЕФИЛЕ в косплее на ГРИГОРИЯ ПЕЧОРИНА. 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊 • 2 день, заявка №588, русское дефиле (примерное время 14:13) ➿➿➿➿➿➿

11🔥8💘2

3 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC130 views36 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Хотите пост??! Самая наша кринжовая с @olvads идея фотосета превратилась в легендарную, все благодаря @aly_svet, просто лучший, все подписываемся

❤‍🔥24🔥74👏1

2 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTC159 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вторая часть:) Мои образы, и сколько ЛАЙКОВ они собрали в тиктоке: (В Женьке почти ничего не записывала. Да и он вообще по всем фронтам обделён. А ЖАЛЬ)

14🔥3❤‍🔥1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Obitel_Aktivista. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пристанище Активиста” (@Obitel_Aktivista), 569 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Obitel_Aktivista.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.