Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for OZK

Channel

OZK

@OZK_67_MSD

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,016subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002047389861
TypeChannel
Username@OZK_67_MSD
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/OZK_67_MSD

Growth

1,0161,0221,0197 August 2026 — 1,022 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,022 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,020 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,016 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,015–1,023 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 14:351,016-4
8 Aug 2026, 05:111,020-2
8 Aug 2026, 00:311,022no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:501,022first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 14s
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

417 reactions across 18 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7618.2%
custom 53707124130059459137217.3%
❤‍🔥6816.3%
🔥5713.7%
custom 5294499970685085923337.91%
266.24%
🏆184.32%
🙏153.60%
😱102.40%
🫡102.40%
🤯51.20%
custom 546977415865094287740.959%
custom 547413889769067376740.959%
😍40.959%
🤝40.959%
custom 522460726779760683730.719%
custom 544940899569134169130.719%
custom 529643346617749516520.48%
🤔20.48%
😭10.24%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 417reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2025 to 3 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @OZK_67_MSD. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 June 2025 to 3 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Jul 2025, 08:12 UTC≈2,790 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Наглядный пример того, что панацею создать невозможно! Всем здравия!

15 Jul 2025, 08:12 UTC≈2,860 views27 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ydocaVideo

ТЕРМООДЕЯЛО ТЕБЯ УБЬЁТ Просто ещё одно наглядное видео для тех, кто ещё верит в чудеса и прогулял уроки физики. Закон сохранения энергии в помощь. @ydoca

😱105🔥4🙏4🤔2🏆1😭1

9 Jul 2025, 08:04 UTC≈3,140 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Салют, всем доброго утра и плодотворного дня !

👍13🤝4🙏3custom 53707124130059459133custom 54494089956913416912

8 Jul 2025, 12:33 UTC≈2,830 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Салют боевые товарищи! Сегодня хочется обсудить тему бронезащиты! На самом деле тема важная, и не терпит пренебрежения! Хотя все из нас "броники" особо и не любят, но носить их необходимо, ведь они предоставляют шанс, шанс вернуться хотя бы живым. И так, хочу сразу выделить такой нюанс, мой взгляд на бронезащиту более имеет отношение к подразделением второй линии, не видущих прямых стрелковых боестолкновений.

👍23🔥6🫡3

8 Jul 2025, 08:05 UTC≈1,750 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Всем привет, хорошего дня!

custom 537071241300594591314👍5😍4custom 522460726779760683731

25 Jun 2025, 06:01 UTC≈2,420 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#жизненное

custom 537071241300594591322🔥142

24 Jun 2025, 15:00 UTC≈2,270 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

⏺Штурмовые группы 4-й отдельной мотострелковой бригады 3-й общевойсковой армии успешно завершили зачистку населённого пункта Дылеевка в ДНР. 🗣При поддержке артиллерии и операторов БПЛА наши парни из соединения «Южной» группировки уверенно продвигаются дальше, ломая оборону противника и закрепляясь на новых рубежах. Работа идёт чётко и слаженно - линия фронта движется вперёд. Источник

🙏8👍63❤‍🔥3🏆1

21 Jun 2025, 07:12 UTC≈2,350 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

⏺ Удар дронами «Герань-2» по объектам инфраструктуры в Овидиополе, Одесская область Источник

custom 529449997068508592311❤‍🔥4🏆2

19 Jun 2025, 14:40 UTC≈2,340 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

📍Донбасс 16 июня вблизи н.п. Зирка операторы БПЛА 29 армии обнаружили замаскированную САУ М109 Паладин производства США. Координаты были переданы «Рубикону». Ночью 17 июня расчет «Рубикона» отработал по САУ ВСУ Ланцетом. САУ уничтожена. Источник

❤‍🔥11custom 52944999706850859234👍3🏆2custom 54494089956913416911

18 Jun 2025, 07:57 UTC≈2,100 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🛵 Эпичные кадры атаки Русской "Герани". Источник

9custom 52944999706850859237🔥6🏆2custom 54741388976906737671

17 Jun 2025, 08:47 UTC≈1,790 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

📍Днепропетровская область, район н.п. Дачное. 😎 FPV-дронами КВН поражены два американских М113, шведский Пансарбандвагн 302 и пикап с л/с ВСУ. Источник

❤‍🔥10custom 52944999706850859234👍3custom 54741388976906737673🏆1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OZK_67_MSD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OZK” (@OZK_67_MSD), 1,016 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OZK_67_MSD.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.