Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for OTControl Wins

Channel

OTControl Wins

@OTControlWins

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

22subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003631928941
TypeChannel
Username@OTControlWins
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/OTControlWins

Growth

172219.512 August 2026 — 17 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20 subscribers27 August 2026 — 22 subscribers12 August 202627 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16–23 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 06:1222+2
19 Aug 2026, 23:4420+3
12 Aug 2026, 03:0017no change
12 Aug 2026, 02:4917first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
113.0%
avg views ÷ 22 subscribers
Avg views / post
24.9
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held20 (7 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total497
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤮1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 21:58 UTC12 viewsread 12 August 2026

🎲 EVENT · 🅳 @DuelWins — Daily gws 3× 6 straight takes $40 USDT Entry: 25⭐ per roll Starts Aug 11 · 22:00 UTC 🔴 LIVE now ⚡ powered by @OTControl

11 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC14 viewsread 12 August 2026

⏰ NO WINNER · 🅳 @DuelWins — Daily gws https://t.me/nft/LolPop-182479 rolls over to the next event. ⚡ powered by @OTControl

11 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC16 viewsread 12 August 2026

🎰 EVENT · 🅳 @DuelWins — Daily gws First 777 takes https://t.me/nft/LolPop-182479 Entry: 10⭐ per roll Starts Aug 11 · 13:30 UTC ⚡ powered by @OTControl

11 Aug 2026, 01:30 UTC19 viewsread 12 August 2026

⏰ NO WINNER · 🅲 Circle Full of Promoters https://t.me/nft/LolPop-210833 rolls over to the next event. ⚡ powered by @OTControl

11 Aug 2026, 00:26 UTC20 viewsread 12 August 2026

🎰 EVENT · 🅲 Circle Full of Promoters First 777 takes https://t.me/nft/LolPop-210833 Starts Aug 11 · 01:30 London ⚡ powered by @OTControl

10 Aug 2026, 22:33 UTC19 viewsread 12 August 2026

⏰ NO WINNER · Geyser MP https://t.me/nft/FaithAmulet-48328 stays with the house. ⚡ powered by @OTControl

10 Aug 2026, 21:12 UTC20 viewsread 12 August 2026

🎰 EVENT · Geyser MP First 777 takes https://t.me/nft/FaithAmulet-48328 Entry: 50⭐ per roll Starts Aug 10 · 17:13 Detroit ⚡ powered by @OTControl

10 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC17 viewsread 12 August 2026

⏰ NO WINNER · 🅳 @DuelWins — Daily gws https://t.me/nft/SwissWatch-9792 rolls over to the next event. ⚡ powered by @OTControl

10 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC23 viewsread 12 August 2026

🎲 EVENT · 🅳 @DuelWins — Daily gws 3× 6 straight takes https://t.me/nft/SwissWatch-9792 Entry: 20⭐ per roll Starts Aug 10 · 13:00 UTC ⚡ powered by @OTControl

10 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC23 viewsread 12 August 2026

🏆 WIN · 🅲 Circle Full of Promoters @reachingfor hit 🎯 Bullseye — winning roll Prize: https://t.me/nft/JesterHat-65551 Payout proof ✓ ⚡ powered by @OTControl

10 Aug 2026, 11:54 UTC25 viewsread 12 August 2026

🎯 EVENT · 🅲 Circle Full of Promoters 2× Bullseye straight takes https://t.me/nft/JesterHat-65551 Entry: 5⭐ per roll Starts Aug 10 · 13:00 London ⚡ powered by @OTControl

9 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC27 viewsread 12 August 2026

📣 COMMUNITY RECAP · 2026-W32 MARKET 1 — 6 events · 5 winners · prizes: $0 ton, $0 ton, $0 ton 🅲 Circle Full of Promoters — 4 events · 3 winners · prizes: 300 stars, 300 Telegram Stars, 300 Stars (From @Luc… Geyser MP — 2 events · 0 winners Vaults OTC — 2 events · 2 winners · prizes: 325 stars, 325 stars Tstj — 1 event · 1 winner · prizes: nothing ⚡ powered by @OTControl

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OTControlWins. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 361,255 of 1,621,754entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OTControl Wins” (@OTControlWins), 22 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OTControlWins.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.