Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for وایکوف شیخ رینزای

Channel

وایکوف شیخ رینزای

@OQRFV_1947

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

532subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002976817308
TypeChannel
Username@OQRFV_1947
Created15 September 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/OQRFV_1947

Growth

5305365337 August 2026 — 535 subscribers8 August 2026 — 535 subscribers14 August 2026 — 536 subscribers22 August 2026 — 531 subscribers29 August 2026 — 530 subscribers5 September 2026 — 532 subscribers5327 August 20265 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 29 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 529–537 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 12:19532+2
29 Aug 2026, 14:54530-1
22 Aug 2026, 03:48531-5
14 Aug 2026, 23:35536+1
8 Aug 2026, 03:49535no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:46535first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 15 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 44m
Average length
13m 07s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

188 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10455.3%
💩5629.8%
👏168.51%
👍42.13%
🌚31.60%
🔥31.60%
🤔21.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 188 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 15 September 2025 to 19 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Sept 2025, 13:38 UTC≈5,680 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

این داستان ادامه دارد . . .

👏166💩2

19 Sept 2025, 13:36 UTC≈6,070 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

. #وایکوف جلسه هشتم . . - خط روند ها و وایکوف - خط روند ها و نقطه ورود - خط روند هاو شکست جعلی

12💩4🔥3

19 Sept 2025, 13:36 UTC≈5,020 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

. . آموزش #وایکوف جلسه ششم . . الگوی سر و شانه در سبک وایکوف سر و شانه های پیچیده در بازار

10💩5👍2

19 Sept 2025, 13:36 UTC≈5,690 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

. . #وایکوف جلسه هفتم . . کانال و ارتباط آن با سبک وایکوف کانال و انتهای روند

11💩5

19 Sept 2025, 13:36 UTC≈4,860 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

#وایکوف جلسه پنجم . . انواع شکست جعلی .

8💩5👍2

19 Sept 2025, 13:36 UTC≈4,230 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

#وایکوف جلسه سوم نواحی عرضه تقاضا و وایکوف بهینه سازی نواحی عرضه تقاضا کدام نواحی عرضه و تقاضا مناسب معامله اند ؟

14💩6🌚1

19 Sept 2025, 13:36 UTC≈4,520 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

#وایکوف جلسه چهارم شکست جعلی چیست ؟ پیش بینی شکست جعلی کجاها معمولا تشکیل می شود ؟

11💩8

19 Sept 2025, 13:36 UTC≈4,000 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

#وایکوف جلسه دوم - وایکوف و ارتباط ان با عرضه تقاضا و سطوح آن - بررسی چرخه ی تصمیم و حرکت

14💩9🌚2

19 Sept 2025, 13:36 UTC≈3,940 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

#وایکوف جلسه اول - دیدگاه وایکوف در مورد بازار - تفاوت دیدگاه وایکوف با آنچه تا کنون آموخته ایم

18💩12🤔2

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @OQRFV_1947. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“وایکوف شیخ رینزای” (@OQRFV_1947), 532 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OQRFV_1947.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.