Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

OK茜 ❤️ 私密空间

@OO77879

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,077subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004427165507
TypeChannel
Username@OO77879
Created1 August 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/OO77879

Growth

1,0761,0771,076.511 Aug 2026, 21:19 — 1,076 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 21:30 — 1,076 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 22:22 — 1,077 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 21:1911 Aug 2026, 22:22
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,076–1,077 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 22:221,077+1
11 Aug 2026, 21:301,076no change
11 Aug 2026, 21:191,076first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.77%
avg views ÷ 1,077 subscribers
Avg views / post
83.7
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held13 (1 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total1,004
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
34s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC59 viewsread 11 August 2026

🎉 抽奖活动:南山 OK茜 @OKxi7866 抽奖活动 📝 说明: ❗️点击👉 @szxglyhglBot 进入机器人查阅老师榜。 t.me/szxglyhglBot?start=-1002640036076 没有群主只有玩家,纯交流纯分享群,分享优质老师,发掘优秀新人。 🎁 奖品: - P100 x 5 - PP200 x 3 - 半价券 x 3 ⏰ 开奖时间(北京时间): 2026年8月14日 18:00:00 ⏳ 距离开奖还有 68 小时 49 分 📋 参与条件: 深圳香港老友会共享资源(2026) 深圳香港老友会抽奖优惠 OK茜 ❤️ 私密空间

11 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC114 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🎰 深圳 OK茜 半价优惠劵 📮 参与条件: 🪪 必须设置用户名 🎫 加入-OK茜 ❤️ 私密空间 🎫 加入-深圳车友会 └ 🔑 发送口令﹝欢迎 OK茜 入住车友会﹞ 🎫 加入-深圳车友会公开榜 🎫 加入-深圳车友会报告 ❗ 口令提示: 请先参与抽奖,再发送口令激活 🎁 奖品内容: 💰️ P半价 × 1 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 1.兑奖联系对应奖品提供方 2.抽奖请先设置用户名 3.兑奖有效期7天,过期无效 4.因炸号、注销、超时等原因一律不兑奖 5.中奖后退出群组和频道,炸号,不予兑奖 6.该活动所有解释权归群管理所有 📅 开奖日期:(北京时间) 2026年08月14日 14时39分00秒

11 Aug 2026, 03:50 UTC120 viewsread 11 August 2026

#ok茜 已在老友会验证上榜 ❗️点击👉 @szxglyhglBot 进入机器人查阅老师榜。 t.me/szxglyhglBot?start=-1002640036076 没有群主只有玩家,纯交流纯分享群 ,分享优质老师,发掘优秀新人。

11 Aug 2026, 02:05 UTC51 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @sznm08Video

👍深圳福利最多群组,没有之一 🎈真实学生出击交流学习群组 👠榜上各种类型老师选择性多 💫深圳·嫩妹学院【交流群】 💫深圳·嫩妹学院【认证榜】 💫深圳·嫩妹学院【出击报告】 💫深圳·嫩妹学院【轮播群】 💌群组客服:@SZcjbwBot 🎁🎁群内不定时发放各种福利,发言积分可兑换半价优惠,大小红包,出击补贴等等

9 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC107 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

OK茜 💖(目前只上门 无课室)💖 年龄:21 身高:165 体重:45 🐻🐻 :C+无科技 皮肤白皙 筷子腿,蜜桃臀, ❄️精致五官 热情主动,风骚御姐,敏感体质 下面紧致,水超多 情趣价值高, p1200💰/45分钟 pp1600💰/90分钟 夜课:4小时5000不限次 💓(目前只上门 无课室)路费10公里内100先出,诚信接单,不喜可退 服务: 🐍 吻,69,无套吹箫,陪洗,👅咪咪,舔蛋蛋,调情,啪啪,还有情趣内衣,白丝,黑丝,制服,各种姿势配合,待哥哥解锁新姿势, 约课:定金100,看不上可退,中途不退 不包出水请理解 禁止🚫喝酒 无套 打桩机 腐臭 磕药 没素质

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @OO77879. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 446,704 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OK茜 ❤️ 私密空间” (@OO77879), 1,077 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OO77879.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.