Channel
@OM_question
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
28subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003954378431 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OM_question |
| Description | Секретный гастропроект от основателей Яффо&ORERO - Отари Квинтрадзе и VOLGA COFFEE ROASTERS - Максима Манылова Открытие - ? Старт - уже сейчас! |
| Created | 16 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OM_question |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 28 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 28 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
65 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 38.5% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 33.8% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 16.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 3.08% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 3.08% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 3.08% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 1.54% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 24 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вы, мы, ПРЕМА! Вот и состоялось наше первое знакомство с вами в новом составе и с новыми идеями! Впереди ещё много интересного - выбор названия, встречи, вкусная еда и кофе По крупицам собираем вашу любовь, концепцию и самых близких людей Оставайтесь с нами на связи, следите за новостями. Кто знает, может быть увидимся уже совсем скоро?
❤5🔥3❤🔥2🥰1
Подошел к концу наш первый день с вами под знаком вопрос на фестивале ПРЕМА Спасибо, что разделили этот трепетный момент, подарили поддержку и поделились своими эмоциями Мы уже записали в свой большой блокнот все названия для нашего проекта, которые вы предложили Самое удивительное, что большинство со словом ЛЮБОВЬ! И, поверьте, это взаимно Впереди ещё два счастливых дня, ещё больше идей и общения🤍 P.s. утром жд…
🔥6❤4🥰3💔1
А мы уже где? А мы уже выставились на фестивале ПРЕМА!
❤4🔥3🏆2💔1
Рассказываем вам, что будет в меню на фестивале ПРЕМА, где встретимся с вами уже завтра! А ещё будем освежать вас лимонадом, бодрить кофе и завтракать кашами в субботу и воскресенье Ждём всех всех всех дарить улыбки, общаться и знакомиться с чем-то новым
❤4🔥4🥰3🐳1
Уже в эти выходные встретимся с вами впервые на фестивале ПРЕМА! Отари Квинтрадзе и Максим Манылов будут лично готовить для вас, общаться, делиться идеями и, конечно же, дарить улыбки. Все три дня у каждого будет возможность предложить свое название новому месту в городе, и кто знает, может быть выберем именно твое! Ведь всегда интересно наблюдать и участвовать в зарождении чего-то нового? P.s. совсем скоро расск…
❤4🔥4🥰2
Продолжаем раскрывать секреты нового проекта от основателей Яффо&ORERO - Отари Квинтрадзе и VOLGA COFFEE ROASTERS Максима Манылова Обещаем вам, что встретимся совсем скоро…
❤4🔥2🥰2
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @OM_question. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,182,453 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Под вопросом” (@OM_question), 28 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OM_question.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.