2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 117–119 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Aug 2026, 04:37
118
no change
24 Aug 2026, 11:46
118
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
39.0%
avg views ÷ 118 subscribers
Avg views / post
46.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held
20 (27 May 2026 – 19 August 2026)
Views total
92
Reactions total
16
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
30m 56s
Average length
3m 52s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
113 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
71
62.8%
🔥
13
11.5%
🫡
13
11.5%
💔
7
6.19%
😁
6
5.31%
❤🔥
3
2.65%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اکثر مخاطبان کامنیوتی بسکتبال اوج دانش و دیتایی که دارن محدود به هایلایات بازی یا بازیکن و این وسط چهار تا ویدیو هم میبینن که به نکته خاصی اشاره کرده و مدیا هر جهتی بگیره اون شخصم فقط همون چیزی رو میبینه که مدیا نشونش میده
همه رو فلاپ کردن شی گیلجس حساسن و بحثی نیست اما این عقیده که شی فقط با فری ترو امتیاز میاره همون چیزی که مدیا نشون میده ، اون وقت ما اینجا باید بگیم برادر من شما که رو فری ترو حساسی اصلا حواست به…
بهترین بازی های لو دورت در پست سیزن 2025 که در نهایت منجر به قهرمانی اوکلاهاما سیتی تاندر شد.
آمار او در این پلی اف:
7.9 PPG
3.9 REB
1.0 AST
1.3 STL
36.6 FG%
34.7 3PT%
آمار او در فصل عادی 2025 که با بودن در تیم اول دفاعی منتخب فصل همراه شد:
10.1 PPG
4.1 REB
1.6 AST
1.1 STL
43.5 FG %
41.3 3PT%
@OKCThunderNews
متاسفانه تیم بخاطر فرار از مالیات مجبور شد ایزایا جو و ارون ویگینز ترید کنه و پیک راند دو بگیره نظرتون راجب این موضوع چیه و بنظرتون توی فری ایجنسی چه فعالیتی بکنه تیم بهترین حالته براش؟
به هر حال نمیشه بهانه ای آورد و تیم پر از نقص بود
اما خب حجم زیادی از اشتباهات داوری و درتی پلی های اسپرز در حال نادیده گرفته شدن است.
اونم در حالی که رسانه تماما مردم عادی و مخاطبین بسکتبال رو به سمت تنفر از تاندر کشونده
مثلا به طور باورنکردنی چند صحنه ای که کارتر برایانت خطای غیر ورزشی روی شی انجام میده رو مردم مورد ستایش قرار دادند.
و در آخر امیدوارم سم پرستی مثل همیشه در اف سیزن حرکت هایی بزنه که بتونیم سال آینده…
من طبیعتاً ناراحتم بخاطر گیم امروزهیچکس دوست نداره فصلش اینطور تمام شه، اما اگر بخوام صادقانه نگاه کنم، احساس میکنم این نتیجه تا حدی قابل پیشبینی بود. مشکلاتی که در طول فصل همراه تیم بودن، در مهمترین بازی سال هم خودشون را نشان دادن و در نهایت هزینهاش را پرداخت کردیم.
یکی از بزرگترین موضوعات پیش روی تیم، قرارداد چته. چت بازیکن ارزشمندی بوده و لحظات خوبی برای تیم ساخته، اما باید واقعبین باشیم و شرایط فعلی تیم …
به شخصه من خودم با ترید چت یا کروسو مخالفم اما بنظرم ترید هارتشتاین یا دورت برای یانیس میتونه خوب باشه و همینجور که به چشم اومد توی کل بازیا نداشتن یک شارپ شوتر مطمئن و مصدومیت اپشن دو تیم در کل بازیا واقعا مشکل ساز بود و شی عملا با همچین سطح دفاعی و دابل تیم شدن زیاد اقدام نمیتونست و واقعا عملکرد خیلی عالی هم داشته
@OKCThunderNews
شاید الان فکر کنید از باخت تاندر عصبیم و نظری که میخوام بدم از روی هیجان و احساساتم هست ، اما من هر جوری فکر میکنم با وجود ومبی تو غرب تنها شانس تاندر برای اینکه ومبی و متوقف کنه باید برای یانیس تردید کنه !
چت واقعا توانایی این و نداره که تو مچ اپ با ومبی شانسی داشته باشه علاوه بر این مورد تاندر از نداشتن شارپ شوتر های مطمئن ضعف شدیدی میبره ، امسال ایزیا جو به طور کامل از روتیشن تیم خارج شد و اینم ضربه بزرگی بود بر…
Signed Amirali Attari
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OKCThunderNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OKC THUNDER⚡️” (@OKCThunderNews), 118 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OKCThunderNews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
