https://www.tradingview.com/x/OVVyKCOV/ #btc #cme gap to be filled around 85500

Channel
🚨𝕆𝔾 🚨 CRYPTO CAFFEINE
@OG_Main
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
833subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001748520798 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OG_Main |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OG_Main |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 833 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 837 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 843 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 843 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
BTC fear & quantum computer
Bitcoin’s seasonality just confirmed it: We’re experiencing the worst November on record. Historically, November has been one of BTC’s strongest months, with an average return of +19.92% and a median of +8.81%. But this time the market flipped completely — instead of strength, we’re seeing deep red. This doesn’t change the long-term cycle structure, but it perfectly reflects the current macro pressure and liquidi…
📣 MACRO + CRYPTO MARKET INTELLIGENCE — NOV 2025 “From Tightening → To Turning” The liquidity tide is shifting — QT ends, rate cuts loom, and smart money is already positioning ahead of retail. 🏦 1️⃣ FED POLICY UPDATE • QT Ends: Dec 1, 2025 → Fed stops balance-sheet runoff ($1.5T reduced since 2022). • Rates: Held at 3.75–4.00%, with first cut expected in Q1 2026. • Why: Repo stress & falling reserves — time to p…
Nvidia Rescues Bitcoin with Higher-Than-Expected Earnings Bitcoin, the leading cryptocurrency by market cap, surged sharply higher on Tuesday, erasing a portion of its devastating losses. This came after tech giant Nvidia reported higher-than-expected earnings. The blowout earnings have alleviated concerns about the artificial intelligence (AI) bubble popping in the near future, like the dot-com bubble. Nvidia’s …
https://www.tradingview.com/x/jJcSx6IA/ now lets see the retracement what #btc will give incoming weeks.
https://www.tradingview.com/x/zUEjhIy0 #btc both #cme gaps filled. Also price hit FVG. Currently Trending at 0.618 - 0.65 fibb levels. This has higher chance to be the area of reaction.
https://bybit.com/en/invite?ref=MQNRKP This is it , i think we will get dead cat bounce from here (green box ). This will give Recovery to rest of the market. #btc
Cme gap #btc to be filled. 👀✅
https://www.coinglass.com/tv/snapshot/Binance_BTCUSDT/e5392d29943d4c748f29777acdd3a0e7 #btc in range, retesting trendline from Q1 - 2024
https://www.tradingview.com/x/IKMJQinA #usdt.d - bearish divergence formed on daily timeframe will push the market prices up for last few days
https://www.tradingview.com/x/75v6egvB/ #BTC #CMEGAP is going to be filled from the last dump.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OG_Main. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 539,603 of 1,584,420entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@CryptoClassics · 79,060
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🚨𝕆𝔾 🚨 CRYPTO CAFFEINE” (@OG_Main), 833 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OG_Main.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.