Channel
@OFCMAS
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
16subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001297823894 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OFCMAS |
| Description | ░⃟☠️◞ COOLEST BOY WHO CAN KILLS YOU WITH HIS EYES GLAZE. ｷ、 ⌂ : : BOT OFC ✆ @OFFICIALMAS_BOT ⌂ : : BOT MPS ✆ @MASDEKMPSBOT |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OFCMAS |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 16 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:09 | 16 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 September 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (10 September 2021 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | — |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 20 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
tes
Sticker, posted without a caption
Halo, saya selaku perwakilan dari @INTELIJENOFC, @OFCMAS, @OFCADEK memutuskan bahwa channel kami tidak lagi berhubungan dengan partnership mana pun, di karenakan jadwal padat para team kami memutuskan untuk vakum dalam jangka waktu yang tidak bisa di tentukan, pemutusan hubungan media partner kami lakukan karena kesibukan team yang membuat hubungan partnership berjalan dengan kurang baik, terimakasih sebelum nya untu…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
close yaa, terimakasih.
ㅤㅤㅤ ℳassive 𝐒alutation 𝐓elelings! we GUCCI KING 95 & TONGKRONGAN TAENNIE calling everyone ( all gender and all chara ) who wants to join the admin and team us. but before you become part of us, please read and unders. ONLY TRAINEE SYSTEM
ㅤ 〔 TAGAR PANDUAN TKJN 〕 ㅤㅤ甘៹ #TKJNINTRO ↬intro all admin ㅤㅤ甘៹ #TKJNINFO ↬info tkjn ㅤㅤ甘៹ #TKJNGALLERY ↬fotbar & vidbar ㅤㅤ甘៹ #TKJNIMG ↬for imagine ㅤㅤ甘៹ #TKJNRNDM ↬kerandoman tkjn ㅤㅤ甘៹ #TKJNKONTEN ↬beberapa konten ㅤㅤ甘៹ #TKJNUPDATE ↬update kth & jennie ⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘…
sSup Ⓣ🅾︎Ⓝ🅶Ⓚ🆁ô🅽Ⓖ🅰︎Ⓝ Ⓣ🅰︎Ⓔ🅽Ⓝ🅸Ⓔ تعال هنا, идите сюда?!$?!@ 🕸🕷 ⅃ЯIƏ&YОꓭ wé 🅆🄸🄻🄻 introducing надеюсь, subs this @ofcttaennie channel first 🥂. Squad только for chara 𝗞𝗜𝗠 𝗧𝗔𝗘𝗛𝗬𝗨𝗡𝗚 & 𝗞𝗜𝗠 𝗝𝗘𝗡𝗡𝗜𝗘. إعطاء الأولو Solidarity and Attitude. Së bashku THIS INTRO. We all 𝗧𝗢𝗡𝗚𝗞𝗥𝗢𝗡𝗚𝗔𝗡 𝗧𝗔𝗘𝗡𝗡𝗜𝗘 admins štate That. ⚔️🎳 𝗧𝗢𝗡𝗚𝗞𝗥𝗢𝗡𝗚𝗔𝗡 𝗧𝗔𝗘𝗡𝗡𝗜𝗘 مع ش يتكون with a LOGO консистенция of the office LOGO.❓♨️ our patents, no COPYING or PLAGIARISM to :…
ㅤㅤㅤㅤ ⋆ ⛓⚔ ⋆ ✧ .「 GKTH HASTAG 」. ✧ ㅤ ⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘⫘ 〃୭ #GKTHINTRO » for intro admin 〃୭ #GKTHGALLERY » for fotbar, vidbar, konten member 〃୭ #GKTHUPDATE » for update kth 〃୭ #GKTHIMG » for imagine 〃୭ #TAEHYUNGPICT » for pict kth 〃୭ #GKTHINFO » for info 〃୭ #GKTHRANDOM » for random 〃୭ #G…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OFCMAS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,156,559 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@OFCMAS named 10 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MAS OFFICIAL” (@OFCMAS), 16 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OFCMAS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.