Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

GLAZER

@OFCGLAZER

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

878subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001877990126
TypeChannel
Username@OFCGLAZER
Created6 May 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/OFCGLAZER

Growth

878879878.56 Aug 2026, 21:47 — 879 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 15:00 — 878 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 21:477 Aug 2026, 15:00
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 878–879 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 15:00878-1
6 Aug 2026, 21:47879first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

5 Jul 2026, 10:51 UTC23 viewsread 6 August 2026

kok tangannya gatel sih

Signed Gavi teamphc RD.ˢⁿ Driftborn

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OFCGLAZER. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 279,474 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 41 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

COLLAB.
@collabruminate · 5
2 posts
[MEMORIES] 𝐂𝐔𝐋𝐓𝐔𝐑𝐀 𝐇𝐈𝐆𝐇 𝐒𝐂𝐇𝐎𝐎𝐋
@culturaofc · 2,146
2 posts
𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐓 𝐏𝐒 𝐂𝐀𝐑𝐍𝐄𝐕𝐎𝐔𝐒
@datapscrnvs · 5
2 posts
𝗢𝗙𝗖 𝗕𝗘𝗝𝗔𝗗
@ofcbejad · 1,074
2 posts
BUBAR
@OFCBULLETPROOF · 127
2 posts
𝐎𝐅𝐂 𝐇𝐈𝐋𝐓𝐌𝐄𝐑
@OFCHILTMER · 297
2 posts
𝗢𝗙𝗖 𝗥𝗨𝗗𝗘'𝗦 𝟴𝟲𝟭
@OFCRUDES881 · 135
2 posts
FALL ØUT MEN // OPLINK
@OfficialFOM · 109
2 posts
𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐀𝐒𝐄𝐕𝐎𝐔𝐒 [ BUBAR ]
@TERASEVOUS · 935
2 posts
𝐎𝐏𝐋𝐈𝐍𝐊 || 𝐙𝐎𝐍𝐀 𝐀𝐄𝐑𝐆𝐋𝐎
@AERGLOZONE · 113
1 post
PARTNER SDUDA
@arsipduda · 19
1 post
𝐎𝐅𝐂 𝐃𝐈𝐕𝐈𝐍𝐄 𝐍Ø𝐄𝐀𝐒𝐘
@dvnofficial · 76
1 post
𝐈𝐓𝐙'𝐓𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐘🚀
@ITZTRENYOFC · 130
1 post
[ HIATUS ] 𝐉𝐎𝐑𝐆𝐄𝐍 𝐇𝐎𝐒𝐏𝐈𝐓𝐀𝐋✙
@JORGENHOSPITAL1 · 95
1 post
𝗞𝗢𝗟𝗘𝗚𝗔 𝗨𝗡𝗜𝗢𝗡𝗦
@Kolegaunions · 6
1 post
Vakum || 𝐌𝐞𝐠𝐚 𝐀𝐥𝐭𝐞𝐳𝐳𝐚 𝐎𝐫𝐠𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐫
@MAOrganizer · 138
1 post
𝐌𝐄𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐈𝐄𝐒 || 𝐎𝐅𝐂. 𝐒𝐓𝐑𝐄𝐄𝐓 𝐑𝐈𝐃𝐄𝐑𝐒
@OFCSTREETRIDERS · 1,233
1 post
𝐓𝐈𝐆𝐄𝐑𝐀𝐋 𝐒𝐐𝐔𝐀𝐃 𝟏𝟔
@Ofctigeralsq · 1,133
1 post
VAKUM
@ofcyewai · 524
1 post
𝐃𝐑𝐀𝐆𝐎𝐍 𝐎𝐑𝐁𝐒 || VAKUM
@officialorbs · 103
1 post
ARSIP JOURNAL
@partnershipcastle · 9
1 post
Partnership toserbase
@Partnershiptsba · 5
1 post
Partnership Vanby
@PartnerVanby · 12
1 post
.
@smithixofc · 260
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GLAZER” (@OFCGLAZER), 878 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OFCGLAZER.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.