Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 💥суперпсина-МЕГАПЕТАРДА☂️❔ [ временное название ]

Channel

💥суперпсина-МЕГАПЕТАРДА☂️❔ [ временное название ]

@OCHKOPOTROSHITEL

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

40subscribers

+20 since we began measuring on 8 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004494903868
TypeChannel
Username@OCHKOPOTROSHITEL
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 September 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/OCHKOPOTROSHITEL

Growth

2040308 September 2026 — 20 subscribers10 September 2026 — 32 subscribers12 September 2026 — 32 subscribers18 September 2026 — 40 subscribers8 September 202618 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17–43 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 04:3740+8
12 Sept 2026, 12:2332no change
10 Sept 2026, 23:5832+12
8 Sept 2026, 16:4720first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 8 September 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
90.6%
avg views ÷ 40 subscribers
Avg views / post
36.2
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
24.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 September 2026
Posts held17 (8 September 202612 September 2026)
Views total616
Reactions total150
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Sept 2026, 12:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

150 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘8758.0%
🔥2818.7%
🌭149.33%
👍96.00%
👾53.33%
💋42.67%
🙏21.33%
🤯10.667%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 150 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2026 to 12 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Sept 2026, 12:10 UTC14 views3 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Photo

У меня реально ноль фантазии ники придумывать я умру

🙏2💘1

12 Sept 2026, 11:25 UTC15 views5 reactionsread 12 September 2026

Я прошла собеседование и меня позвали на стажировку.. НО ОКАЗАЛОСЬ Я ПРИШЛА НЕ ТУДА..но меня позвали на стажировку.. НЕ НУ Я ДАЖЕ НЕ ЗНАЮ КАКИЕ ЭМОЦИИ ИСПЫТЫВАТЬ

🔥4💘1

12 Sept 2026, 05:12 UTC25 views6 reactionsread 12 September 2026

Блин надо будет ник нормальный придумать, не дай бог то что у меня сейчас приживется

💘6

12 Sept 2026, 05:09 UTC27 views18 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Photo

Няшный чиби коллаб с подписчицей 💖 @AvocadoArtic

💘12🔥4🌭2

12 Sept 2026, 04:26 UTC25 views7 reactionsread 12 September 2026

Много текста тупого читать необязательно Господи у меня страх присутствует вести этот канал около-щитпостно, потому что раньше я пипец перфекционистом была.. хоть я стараюсь только что-то интересное выкладывать, так как тупые щитпосты мне самой не особо нравятся у других художников читать в их основных каналах, но очень хочется просто общаться в коментах и делиться чем-то, мыслями всякими, а заводить отдельный канал

👾5👍1💘1

12 Sept 2026, 02:26 UTC29 views15 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Photo

меня возбуждает его осанка и то как он прогибается короче я бы вдула

🌭12💘3

11 Sept 2026, 22:18 UTC26 views4 reactionsread 12 September 2026

Кажется я разучилась нормально рисовать и умею только по пояс и по плечи это пизда.......надо что-то делать с этим

👍4

11 Sept 2026, 22:08 UTC28 views16 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Photo

Чето толком разрисоваться не выходит...но из хорошего завтра иду на собеседование

💘14💋2

10 Sept 2026, 11:13 UTC34 views8 reactionsread 12 September 2026

Ниче умного рисовать пока нет настроение, поэтому кого щас нарисовать эда или освальда очередного...?

💘5👍3

9 Sept 2026, 14:08 UTC38 views15 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Photo

Пытаюсь устроиться на работу, если получится то будет ахуенно, куплю миллион мерча.. но если не получится буду рисовать миллион артов правда в нищите

💘8🔥4💋2👍1

9 Sept 2026, 11:05 UTC38 views7 reactionsread 12 September 2026

Но вообще хз не шарю за вселенную майора грома. Смотрела два фильма, не понравилось. А потом меня в 2022 году знакомые замучали обсуждением комиксов но мне тоже не зашло чёто как и все комиксы Bubble, не моё короче безнег

💘7

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @OCHKOPOTROSHITEL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“💥суперпсина-МЕГАПЕТАРДА☂️❔ [ временное название ]” (@OCHKOPOTROSHITEL), 40 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OCHKOPOTROSHITEL.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.