Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Архив | OBiAFGKM

@OBiAFGKM

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

305subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001801933107
TypeChannel
Username@OBiAFGKM
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/OBiAFGKM

Growth

3059 Aug 2026, 15:17 — 305 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 17:22 — 305 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 15:179 Aug 2026, 17:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 304–306 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 17:22305no change
9 Aug 2026, 15:17305first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 16 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
35s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,452 reactions across 18 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 533915693609493331227118.7%
custom 537084913899486671625317.4%
18012.4%
🔥15810.9%
🥰1167.99%
🍓1027.02%
🥴1016.96%
custom 5373086447588896435976.68%
custom 5362054729599825936825.65%
💔342.34%
😢241.65%
❤‍🔥161.10%
💘80.551%
😭80.551%
🤯20.138%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,452reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 November 2025 to 4 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @OBiAFGKM. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 November 2025 to 4 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Jun 2026, 16:29 UTC179 views40 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

мне взгрустнулось я сделала похоронное видео давайте вспомним что у нас было и что мы недостаточно ценили

😢227🍓7😭2custom 53708491389948667162

4 Jun 2026, 16:27 UTC140 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026

ксенли нация дышим

custom 5370849138994866716216

13 Mar 2026, 15:35 UTC351 views51 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Каминг аут я с концами валю из стоуна начинаю новую жизнь надежды на этот канал можете не возлагать С позором убежала в хазбин аххаа поэтому если кому то нужно буду тут https://t.me/dukatdu Всех люблю адиос крест не умер обещаю

💔346😭6😢2🍓1🔥1custom 53620547295998259361

5 Jan 2026, 09:53 UTC440 views56 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ivvka_wwPhoto

проснулись улыбнулись #art@ivvka_ww #drstone #sengen

🔥27custom 536205472959982593618custom 53708491389948667169💘2

1 Jan 2026, 11:04 UTC485 views71 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @konahartPhoto

Читайте Черный Крест Подарок с тайного Санты тапкка для прекрасной Оби 🎄🎄

41custom 537084913899486671616custom 53620547295998259368🥴5💘1

29 Dec 2025, 22:02 UTC≈1,010 views87 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

БУ #спойлер@xenleyZINE

custom 537084913899486671637🔥21custom 536205472959982593618🥰43🤯2🍓1💘1

30 Nov 2025, 23:31 UTC500 views69 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @dnk43cmPhoto

подарок для обички на ксенлезиновского тайного санту 🥺🤩😕 🤩читайте ее работу!!

34🥴14custom 533915693609493331213custom 53730864475888964355custom 53708491389948667162🍓1

30 Nov 2025, 23:30 UTC961 views99 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

тайный санта от ксенли зина для графа !!!🌟 #drstone@OBiAFGKM

46custom 537084913899486671621🔥19🥰7custom 53391569360949333124🍓1💘1

23 Nov 2025, 09:41 UTC908 views110 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Признавайтесь чей 🚬 #drstone@OBiAFGKM

🥰58custom 537084913899486671624🔥15❤‍🔥6custom 537308644758889643532custom 53391569360949333121custom 53620547295998259361

23 Nov 2025, 07:51 UTC877 views122 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Время закупаться подарками✖️ #drstone@OBiAFGKM

🔥58custom 533915693609493331231custom 536205472959982593618❤‍🔥8💘32custom 53708491389948667161custom 53730864475888964351

22 Nov 2025, 16:43 UTC474 views83 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Пускаю слюни на этот кусок будущей кмшки #скетч@OBiAFGKM

custom 533915693609493331242custom 536205472959982593616🥴15🔥91

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @OBiAFGKM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 528,255 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Архив | OBiAFGKM” (@OBiAFGKM), 305 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OBiAFGKM.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.