Channel
@O6lkqAPHKY9mMDk0
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
346subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001665847685 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @O6lkqAPHKY9mMDk0 |
| Created | 15 January 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/O6lkqAPHKY9mMDk0 |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:40 | 346 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 03:39 | 347 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:27 | 348 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 352 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 354 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 357 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:29 | 357 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 15 January 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 March 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
757 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 431 | 56.9% | |
| ❤ | 201 | 26.6% | |
| 😁 | 81 | 10.7% | |
| 💩 | 14 | 1.85% | |
| 🎉 | 9 | 1.19% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 1.06% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 0.661% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 0.661% | |
| 🤮 | 3 | 0.396% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 757 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2022 to 12 March 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
L’abstention a-t-elle des vertus ? C’est un sujet délicat n’est-ce pas …. Même si l’abstention concerne environ 25% de la population en âge de voter , la très grande majorité considère cette « position » comme totalement inconsciente voir irresponsable. Les arguments pour justifier cela ? ⁃ nos anciens se sont battus pour le droit de vote . ⁃ En t’abstenant tu donnes des voix à untel . ⁃ Si tu t’abstiens alors…
👍51❤12👏7
Video, posted without a caption
Moins de 2 mn pour résumer la façon dont « ils » nous ont mis la carotte !!!
👍17😁9
Ce soir 19h …..
Le Président du Conseil Scientifique vient de faire une déclaration incroyable !!! La vérité s’infiltre désormais de partout et le navire du mensonge commence à prendre l’eau …… Il va bientôt sombrer 🙏❤️❤️
❤24👍7🤩1
La picouze n’évite pas : - la contamination - la transmission - les formes graves Mais elle t’empêche d’être inquiet !! 😂😂😂😂
👍18😁13🔥1
Quand un avocat renommé se transforme en représentant de commerce ( rémunéré ?) pour venter les mérites de l’application « nos lois ». Dans une vidéo cet avocat commence par nous dire qu’il « avait complètement oublié de nous partager cette info importante » ….. Ça commence déjà très mal car cette « technique de vente » grossière est à lire entre les lignes , sous entendant qu’il n’aurait donc aucun intérêt perso à…
👍30🔥3
« Omicron est beaucoup plus dangereux mais moins sévère » J. Castex Donc Omicron menace encore plus notre existence mais dans sa grande clémence il ne nous fera aucun mal 😜 Je n’aurai pas dit mieux pour démontrer que grâce à Omicron l’immunité naturelle vient de nous sauver de la pandémie la plus terrible de tous les temps !!!! Et Veran de rajouter que « la vérité d’un jour n’est pas forcément celle du lendemain »…
👍31😁10❤3
Quand Pfizer rachète pour 6,7 milliards de dollars un labo qui ne fait que 306 000 dollars de chiffre d’affaire annuel ! En gros l’équivalent du salaire d’un cadre supérieur… Bon ….ce labo est spécialisé dans les traitements qui vont soigner les effets secondaires du vaccin donc du coup tu comprends que l’investissement est forcément rentable ! 😜😜 https://www.lefigaro.fr/societes/pfizer-acquiert-le-laboratoire-arena…
👍14
Méfions nous du cheval de Troie !!!
👍29❤7
Video, posted without a caption
👍40❤13😁5
Video, posted without a caption
💩14👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @O6lkqAPHKY9mMDk0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Francky Relou” (@O6lkqAPHKY9mMDk0), 346 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/O6lkqAPHKY9mMDk0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.