I like this seems very oversold 0xc5c4fcd6147e3bdaeeb5a0898a439aec1e1baba3
❤1

Channel
@NzzCalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
200subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002342082068 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NzzCalls |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NzzCalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 200 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 203 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 205 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 211 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 211 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
87 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 40 | 46.0% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 23.0% | |
| 😭 | 8 | 9.20% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 5.75% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 3.45% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 3.45% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 3.45% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.30% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 1.15% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.15% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 1.15% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2025 to 10 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I like this seems very oversold 0xc5c4fcd6147e3bdaeeb5a0898a439aec1e1baba3
❤1
https://x.com/1Nzz_/status/2042743258397163819?s=20
❤1
2x from call, still holding i think higher
❤2
Aped this on monad, bit degen but first thing to catch vol as a new launch in a hot sec p funny aswell, https://x.com/trading_axe/status/2042660718109917567 0x6ac9567243d96c10d7dda29504438ed8375a7777
👏2
not been a bad month
🤔3
for the 5 people who didnt lose it all on abstract
😭8🔥3
Looks like we've lost 70 members anyway might post some base stuff in here
🔥6👀1
Hi
😱5🔥2
made a new monad gc https://t.me/MonaddCartel
❤3🗿1
@abstractcartel If the one above doesn’t work try this
❤4
Adding to this we’ve made a new public chat since the main one was getting too cluttered with retarded shit and lurkers. t.me/abstractcartel
❤4
Kicked over 300 people yesterday, keeping the group invite only. Who wants an invite and why should you be added?
❤15👀2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NzzCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nzz Calls” (@NzzCalls), 200 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NzzCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.