Channel
@Nureke_server
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
365subscribers
-42 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002454251576 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Nureke_server |
| Created | 23 January 2025 β measured β dated from the channelβs first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Nureke_server |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 365 | -25 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 390 | -15 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:55 | 405 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 407 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 407 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 23 January 2025 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
133 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| customΒ 5246838679946687554 | 78 | 58.6% | |
| π | 24 | 18.0% | |
| π | 12 | 9.02% | |
| π― | 8 | 6.02% | |
| π± | 7 | 5.26% | |
| π | 3 | 2.26% | |
| β€ | 1 | 0.752% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id β no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegramβs.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 133reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2025 to 22 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @Nureke_server. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 January 2025 to 22 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
π« Assalam aleykum π€ πFree Fire o'yini uchun Almaz bot π π€Bot qulayliliklari: Admin javobini kutib o'tirmaysiz danatni o'zingiz harid qilasiz danat 5 - 60 daqiqada tushadi havsiz ishonshli va arzon βοΈ πBot manzili: @OsonDanatBot βοΈ βοΈSavol va tavsiyangiz bo'lsa π¨βπ» Support: @Nureke_offical
π―3
Assalam aleykum π€ Biz yangi danat bot ochdik βοΈ Bu bot aynan Free Fire o'yniga danat soladi βοΈ Ishonshli Tezkor Arzon βοΈ Admin javobini kutib otirmaysiz o'zingiz bemolol botan danat harit qilishingiz mumkun βοΈ πBot silkasi @OsonDanatBot π
β€1
π ALMAZ SERVIS 24/7 ISHLAYABDI γ½ β‘οΈ Murojat uchun: @Nureke_offical βοΈ β‘οΈ Otziv: @Nureke_otzive βοΈ β‘οΈ Karta: @Nureke_card βοΈ β‘οΈ Almaz Servis: @Nureke_server βοΈ
customΒ 524683867994668755422π±7π3
β EVO ACCESS 3D - 10.000 SO'M π΅ β EVO ACCESS 7D - 15.000 SO'M π΅ β EVO ACCESS 30D - 40.000 SO'M π΅ β‘οΈ Murojat uchun @Nureke_offical β
customΒ 524683867994668755415π6π5
ππβπππππ π105 Almaz - 11.000 soβm πΊπΏ π210 Almaz - 22.000 so'm πΊπΏ π326 Almaz - 33.000 soβm πΊπΏ π431 Almaz - 44.000 soβm πΊπΏ π546 Almaz - 55.000 soβm πΊπΏ π872 Almaz - 88.000 soβm πΊπΏ π1113 Almaz - 110.000 soβm πΊπΏ π1439 Almaz - 143.000 soβm πΊπΏ π1659 Almaz - 165.000 soβm πΊπΏ π2398 Almaz - 220.000 soβm πΊπΏ π2944 Almaz - 275.000 soβm πΊπΏ π3511 Almaz - 330.000 soβm πΊπΏ π4796 Almaz - 440.000 soβm πΊπΏ π6160 Almaz - 550.000 soβmπΊπΏ π72β¦
customΒ 524683867994668755421π16π―5
Assalam aleykum π€
customΒ 524683867994668755420π6π3
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @Nureke_server. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions β Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank β 92,498 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βNureke | Almaz Servis πβ (@Nureke_server), 365 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nureke_server.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.