Channel
@NoxchiLivesMatter
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
131subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001518014392 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NoxchiLivesMatter |
| Created | 23 January 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NoxchiLivesMatter |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 131 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 131 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 4 December 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
103 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 56 | 54.4% | |
| 😁 | 22 | 21.4% | |
| 🤬 | 16 | 15.5% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 4.85% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 1.94% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.971% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.971% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 December 2022 to 5 December 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Путин с Кадыровым являются самыми главными ЛГБТшниками в мире, ибо они насильники. Если Запад разрешает быть представителем ЛГБТ, дозволяет гомосексуализм, то Россия этот гомосексуализм навязывает в виде изнасилований. Путинский режим как раз и прославился изнасилованиями мужчин, которые снимаются на камеру для шантажа.
👍21😁14🤬8🥰1
Хочу высказать свое мнение насчет деятельности этого канала. Лично я поддерживаю то, что они делают. Некоторые в комментариях начали там у них говорить, что вот другие народы увидят, что среди нас есть извращенцы и так далее. И что? Это будет открытием мирового масштаба, если кто-то узнает, что мы такой же народ как и остальные, что среди нас тоже бывают разные люди? Это уже устаревший и неактуальный довод. С таки…
👍9
Нет, они живы! Тумсо Ваша, пусть Аллах дарует тебе рай !
👍7
https://youtu.be/xXrWeY0ijds
Дичайшая новость, конечно, но не можем не поделиться ею, так как она достоверна и проверена нами. Дело в том, что на днях Кадыров, будучи под сильным кайфом, выбежал в одном нижнем белье из своей резиденции и бегал по ее территории. Вскоре охрана, увидев это, кое-как увела его в здание, после чего сразу же отправилась к высоткам "Грозный-Сити". У всех находившихся там жильцов, чьи окна выходили на резиденцию, прове…
😁3❤1
🇷🇺🇪🇺 НАТО, без паники, уверяю вас, все под контролем. Твой отец👨🏾🚀 ахмат чай☕ гагарин🚀 летит ещё люля ? #Кадыров #НАТО #Люля #ХосиЮртарКотам @NoxchiLivesMatter
👍5😁2
В сети были опубликованы такие фотографии, на которых, как заявляют, жители луганской области казнённые российскими террористами за работу на разведку (своего народа) Украины. Украинские герои ! #Украина #Роssия #РусскийМир
👍4🤬3❤1
«Кремль не будет воевать в Грузии» - 2008 «Кремль не будет воевать в Украине» - 2014 «Кремль не будет воевать в Сирии» - 2015 «Кремль не будет воевать в Беларуси» - вы находитесь здесь #РусскийМир #ИхТамНет
👍6
Не забудте етого Нохчи !!! Диц дела лелаш йол муртадш щу шай г1аскхишан тца хета нах !
👍2
Российской оппозиции не существует. Они все чертовы империалисты. Телеканал "Дождь", который базируется в Риге, переживает за российских солдат в окопах и хочет помогать им с оснащением, чтобы тем было комфортнее убивать мирных украинцев.
ВСУ выложили в соцсетях видео, на котором показано, как российский солдат совершил подвиг. Группа военнослужащих грузила в машину боеприпасы. Это заметили украинские разведчики. Через несколько минут они отрыли огонь по солдатам. Военные успели спрятаться в стоящем неподалеку доме. Однако, машина, в которой находились боеприпасы, загорелась. Это могло привести к взрыву. Прекрасно осознавая все риски, один боец сел …
Мы покажем то, что не покажет ЧГТРК Связаться с нами @SIYDAC_bot Чат для обсуждений: https://t.me/SIYDAC_chat https://t.me/SIYDAC
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @NoxchiLivesMatter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@NoxchiLivesMatter named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NOXÇIJÇÜO ICHKERIA” (@NoxchiLivesMatter), 131 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NoxchiLivesMatter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.