Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

черный темщик

@NowostyTemsh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

676subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002535028652
TypeChannel
Username@NowostyTemsh
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/NowostyTemsh

Growth

676677676.57 Aug 2026, 16:03 — 677 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 02:32 — 677 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 08:45 — 676 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:038 Aug 2026, 08:45
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 676–677 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 08:45676-1
8 Aug 2026, 02:32677no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:03677first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 14 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

126 reactions across 12 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5644.4%
🔥1310.3%
🤣107.94%
🤯97.14%
❤‍🔥75.56%
👏75.56%
🤔53.97%
😁43.17%
🥰43.17%
🦄32.38%
🗿21.59%
😢21.59%
🎄10.794%
👍10.794%
😍10.794%
🤝10.794%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2025 to 30 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Sept 2025, 13:02 UTC797 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🦋 Чек на 🪙 100 USDT ($100.01).

1🗿1

30 Sept 2025, 12:44 UTC761 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ставьте ❤️ и будет еще раздачи

9

17 Aug 2025, 10:57 UTC≈1,510 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Петербурженка потеряла 2,5 миллиона рублей через мессенджер Max из-за мошенников На уловку аферистов попалась 70-летняя жительница Санкт-Петербурга. Пенсионерка в ходе телефонного разговора со злоумышленником, который представился сотрудником компании «Росфинансы», установила на свой смартфон новый мессенджер Max. Далее с петербурженкой связался другой неизвестный, представившийся сотрудником ФСБ. Мужчина сообщил,

3🔥2🤯2👍1👏1🤝1🥰1

16 Aug 2025, 17:55 UTC≈1,080 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

У съемочной группы украли камеру на съемках сюжета о кражах Камеру, принадлежавшую съемочной группе саудовского телеканала Al Ekhbariya, похитили во время съемок сюжета о росте количества краж в Лондоне. В социальных сетях опубликовали видеозапись, на которой прохожий завладевает оборудованием телеканала и скрывается с ним. Словил тайминг черный темщик

6👏3🥰2

16 Aug 2025, 11:48 UTC946 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😳Нарисованный камень продали за $606 000! 🪨В рамках NFT-коллекции было выпущено ровно 100 таких «камней», и каждый из них разошёлся среди коллекционеров за внушительные суммы. черный темщик

7🔥3😁2

15 Aug 2025, 17:31 UTC882 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💵Хакер украл бабки и поднялся на крипте 🚫Взломав платформу Radiant Capital, неизвестный похитил $53 млн и сразу же конвертировал их в 21 957 ETH. Рост курса сделал своё дело — теперь эти активы стоят примерно $102 млн. Часть добычи — 9 631 ETH — он уже реализовал по средней цене $4 562, выручив $44 млн. Остаток — 12 326 ETH на сумму около $58,6 млн — по-прежнему хранится на его кошельке. черный темщик

7❤‍🔥1🤯1😁1

15 Aug 2025, 09:45 UTC957 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пора подвести итоги, сколько же заработал Дуров с ночного дропа. 🎁 30000⭐️ — 150 000 000⭐️ (≈ 2 250 000$) 🎁 5000⭐️ — 100 000 000⭐️ (≈ 1 500 000$) 🎁 2500⭐️ — 100 000 000⭐️ (≈ 1 500 000$) 🎁 500⭐️ — 75 000 000⭐️ (≈ 1 125 000$) 🎁 300⭐️ — 75 000 000⭐️ (≈ 1 125 000$) 🎁 150⭐️ — 75 000 000⭐️ (≈ 1 125 000$) В общей сумме Павел заработал 8 625 000$ — буквальано за 1 минуту. черный темщик

7🤯6❤‍🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @NowostyTemsh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,253,445 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“черный темщик” (@NowostyTemsh), 676 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NowostyTemsh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.