These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
1,710 average views per post against 1,062 subscribers — an engagement rate of 161.4%. Across the 32,966 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,162 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 8.29% and 28.3%, with a median of 15.7%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (28 July 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Posts measured
11 of 11 published in the window (0 exact, 11 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
18,850
Mature posts only
166.5% over 10 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 27 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 20 days, net -637. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 965–1,795 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 03:57
1,062
+1
24 Aug 2026, 01:59
1,061
-4
20 Aug 2026, 01:05
1,065
-630
17 Aug 2026, 10:29
1,695
-1
10 Aug 2026, 14:51
1,696
-3
7 Aug 2026, 20:14
1,699
no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:01
1,699
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
161.4%
avg views ÷ 1,062 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,710
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
11
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
20 (20 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
18,850
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 34s
Average length
36s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
Ad load
5.00%
1 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
2,710
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,780
over 19 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqvawpRx
1
27 July 2026
27 July 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🚨 В Челябинске задержали мужчину, который пытался увести ребёнка
Инцидент произошёл в ЖК «Вишнёвая горка». По словам очевидцев, мужчина отобрал у мальчика сумку, хватал его за руки и одежду и пытался увести. Ребёнок сопротивлялся, а проходившие мимо женщины смогли его отбить.
Подозреваемого быстро нашли — им оказался 37-летний мужчина. Сейчас полиция выясняет причины его поведения и решает, как квалифицировать прои…
Доброе утро, Челябинск!
Сегодня отмечается День пива IPA. Но четверг — ещё не пятница, поэтому держим себя в руках 😏
Днём на улице обещают до +23 градусов, возможен дождь 🌦
🥵 В большинстве проверенных автобусов Челябинска температура превысила норму
С 20 по 31 июля контролёры проверили 134 автобуса и нашли 101 нарушение температурного режима. Чаще всего духоту фиксировали на маршрутах № 2, 4, 9, 18, 22, 125 и 483.
По словам проверяющих, во многих автобусах кондиционеры работали, но из-за жары, открывающихся дверей и переполненных салонов просто не справлялись. Перевозчикам выставят шт…
🚘 В Каслях пьяный водитель устроил смертельное ДТП
Ночью 20-летний парень не справился с управлением на мокрой дороге, выехал на встречную полосу и врезался в опору ЛЭП.
Одна из пассажирок погибла на месте. Водителя доставили в больницу в тяжёлом состоянии, ещё двое его спутников получили лёгкие травмы. На время следствия молодого человека отправили в СИЗО на два месяца.
🌊 В посёлке Киолим эвакуировали жителей из-за подъёма воды
После сильного ливня уровень воды в Киолимском водохранилище приблизился к критической отметке. Власти решили заранее эвакуировать жителей посёлка до улучшения ситуации.
В соцсетях появились слухи о прорыве дамбы, однако власти Карабашского округа эту информацию опровергли.
Сегодня в новых районах Челябинска проверят сирены
Сигнал прозвучит в 16:00 в посёлках Западный, Пригородный и Шагол, микрорайонах Парковый, Парковый-2 и Чурилово, а также в ЖК «Александровский» и «Ньютон».
Проверку переносили с прошлой недели из-за беспилотной опасности.
🚃 На улице Российской до 20 августа остановили трамваи
Из-за ремонта теплотрассы вагоны не ходят от проспекта Победы до разворотного кольца.
Для автомобилистов у дома № 20к2 перекрыли крайнюю правую полосу. Ограничение продлится до 10 октября.
🚇 В Челябинске начали прокладывать третий тоннель метротрама
Тоннелепроходческий щит «Лидия» двинется от котлована на проспекте Победы в сторону станции «Торговый центр».
📷Наиль Фаттахов
🐕 В ЖК «Краснопольский» овчарка насмерть загрызла маленькую собаку
По словам местного жителя, крупная овчарка без намордника набросилась на питомца, которого выгуливала девочка-подросток.
Малышку спасти не удалось.
💰 ТРК «Родник» и «Алмаз» в третий раз выставили на продажу за 12 млрд рублей
Имущество, ранее изъятое у бывшего губернатора Михаила Юревича, снова ищет покупателя. На торги выставили 100% долей ООО «Родник» и управляющей компании «Содействие»
В лот входят сам ТЦ «Родник» (126 тыс. кв. м), «Алмаз» (212 тыс. кв. м), земельные участки под ними и площадка на пересечении Труда и Чайковского
🛟 На озере Касарги двух подруг унесло на матрасе за два километра от берега
Девушки 29 и 30 лет решили поплавать на надувном матрасе, но их унесло течением. К счастью, их заметили спасатели, которые добрались до подруг на моторной лодке и вернули их на берег. Медицинская помощь не понадобилась.
🌫 В Челябинской области снова продлили режим НМУ
Опасность образования смога сохранится ещё сутки — с 19:00 27 июля до 19:00 28 июля, сообщили в Гидрометцентре
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NovostiChelyabinsk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,527,046 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ЧЕЛЯБИНСК СЕГОДНЯ @chelyabinsxk · 62,866 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Челябинск | Новости Челябинска” (@NovostiChelyabinsk), 1,062 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NovostiChelyabinsk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.