Channel
@NotorNew
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
91subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002114957495 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NotorNew |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NotorNew |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 91 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 91 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 10 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
355 reactions across 14 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5445138604198222104 | 71 | 20.0% | |
| ❤ | 63 | 17.7% | |
| custom 5213147732411166227 | 40 | 11.3% | |
| custom 5442976418877169595 | 39 | 11.0% | |
| custom 5382161133664750635 | 36 | 10.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 35 | 9.86% | |
| 💔 | 21 | 5.92% | |
| 😭 | 11 | 3.10% | |
| 💘 | 9 | 2.54% | |
| 😨 | 9 | 2.54% | |
| custom 5444916975295814826 | 8 | 2.25% | |
| 💋 | 5 | 1.41% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 0.845% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 0.845% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.282% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 0.282% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 355reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2025 to 14 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🆕🆕🆕 📌С недавнего времени наши Shidare, Minns и Черешня стали частью команды ECLIPSE Мы будем рады если вы поддержите девочек в новой команде. В этом канале вы сможете видеть их чаще: https://t.me/eclipsecdteam
❤7🤨3❤🔥2💅1🆒1
🤍Пришли на минутку сказать про личные каналы девочек: ➡️MinnS ➡️Shidare ➡️Sylvon ➡️Frozen ➡️Kami ➡️Черешня
custom 53821611336647506359custom 54429764188771695954custom 54451386041982221044custom 52131477324111662272custom 54449169752958148262
На какие то вопросы можем ответить в анонимке: https://t.me/ReadandTalk_bot
🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯🕯 Сегодня 25.06.25 наша команда прекращает свое существование. Not or new, we will never choose Многое произошло, и мы старались держаться вместе. Но наши пути должны разойтись. This history is over.... В закрепленных сообщениях вы можете найти тгк наших участниц и продолжать следить за ними уже там. Спасибо за то, что были с нами в этой не долгой, но насыщенной истории. С уважением уже бывший лидер -…
💔21😭11😨9
N/ideal pinned a photo
🅰️🔤➖🔤🔤🔤 🅰️🅰️🔤🔤 🅰️🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🥪🔠🔤🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠➖ 🅰️ 🔠🔠🔤🔠🔠🔠🥪 Для доступа к видео в хорошем качестве и хорошей скоростью вам нужно только перейти по ссылке в вк: https://vk.com/wall-223349241_18
custom 544513860419822210413custom 54429764188771695954❤🔥3custom 53821611336647506352custom 52131477324111662271
У вас есть проблемы с просмотром кавера? Нужно ли добавить доп ссылку на другой ресурс для просмотра ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🤩Еще раз хотим сказать Альоне большое спасибо за съёмку кавера 🤩
custom 544513860419822210411custom 53821611336647506353custom 54429764188771695953custom 52131477324111662272❤🔥1
🅰️🅰️🔤➖🔤🔤🔤 🅰️🅰️🅰️🔤🔤 🅰️🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🥪🔠🔤🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠➖ 🅰️ 🔠🔠🔤🔠🔠🔠🥪
custom 521314773241116622719❤4❤🔥3😍3custom 54451386041982221043custom 53821611336647506351
🥪🔠🔠🔤🔠🔠🔠🥪 ➖Уже сегодня выйдет наш кавер на песню KATSEYE- GNARLY ➖Осталось совсем немного 2️⃣4️⃣🔣0️⃣6️⃣🔣2️⃣5️⃣
custom 544297641887716959511custom 52131477324111662274❤🔥3custom 53821611336647506352❤1💋1
🥪🔠🔠🔤🔠🔠🔠🥪 Obvi, obvi, they be tryna copy 🦇🦇
custom 544513860419822210413❤7custom 53821611336647506355❤🔥2custom 54449169752958148262💋1
🥪🔠🔠🔤🔠🔠🔠🥪 Hottie, hottie, like a bag of Takis 🦇🦇
❤🔥16custom 54451386041982221046💘5custom 52131477324111662273custom 54429764188771695952custom 53821611336647506351
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @NotorNew. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
У вас есть проблемы с просмотром кавера? Нужно ли добавить доп ссылку на другой ресурс для просмотра ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2025 to 14 August 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 976,889 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@NotorNew named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“N/ideal” (@NotorNew), 91 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NotorNew.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.