Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

On Liberty | درباره‌ی آزادی

@Notes_On_Liberty

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,571subscribers

+192 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001264717994
TypeChannel
Username@Notes_On_Liberty
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Notes_On_Liberty

Growth

6,3676,5716,4696 August 2026 — 6,379 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,373 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,367 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,571 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +192. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,336–6,602 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:146,571+204
9 Aug 2026, 11:086,367-6
6 Aug 2026, 20:506,373-6
6 Aug 2026, 11:056,379first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.0%
avg views ÷ 6,571 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,380
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
19
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held22 (7 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total26,243
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTC127 viewsread 12 August 2026

🌟 به زودی این پست حذف خواهد شد لطفاً زودتر وارد شوید .💎〰 از فرصت پیش آمده استفاده کنید...✨️

11 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC196 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @derakhshan_tabadolatt

⏰ با انتخاب گزینه موردنظر‌، به جامعه علاقه‌مندان دانش، هنر‌ و فلسفه بپیوندید. 🎬 سینما 🥢 📄 فلسفه 🎧 موسیقی🥢 📖 ادبیات 📝 نقاشی 🥢 💡 علمی این پست تبلیغاتی نیست، برای پیشرفت و رشد شماست... 👈 لینک ورود به پوشه ➡️

11 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC500 viewsread 12 August 2026

حزب دموکرات آمریکا نه اصیل‌ترین حزب در آمریکاست و نه از ابتدا راستگرا بوده که حالا چپ‌گرا شده باشد! این حزب همواره، از ابتدای پیدایش، پشتیبان ایده‌های چپ‌گرایانه بوده و همواره تغییرات عمده‌ای را در ساختار ایالات متّحده پدید آورده است؛ حزبی که ظهورش با انتخابات ۱۸۲۴، اندرو جکسون و دگرگونی فاجعه‌بار نظام انتخاباتی آمریکا پیوند خورده، مدافع سیاست‌های انبساطی و تورّم‌زایی مانند free silver بوده، پیشگام تصویب متمّم شانزده

5 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC≈1,020 viewsread 12 August 2026

📃 استبداد نوین و شیوه‌های آن (۲) | ✍🏻 ویلیام هنری چمبرلین ➣ @Notes_On_Liberty هیچ‌یک از ترفندهای سرکوب و قساوت اداری را نمی‌توان یافت که دیکتاتوری‌های فاشیستی از عملکرد اتّحاد جماهیر شوروی نیاموخته باشند یا نمی‌توانستند بیاموزند. آن‌ها خود را شاگردانی بسیار مستعد نشان داده‌اند. کتاب‌های بسیاری درباره‌ی شکنجه‌های روحی و جسمی افرادی که در چنگال «گ‌‌.پ‌.او»ی شوروی (که اکنون تغییر نام داده)، گشتاپوی آلمان و پلیس سیاسی

4 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

واکنش اونی که کلیه‌ش رو فروخته تا آیفون بخره به مکاشفات رفیق تدینوف:

3 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

از چهارشنبه‌های سفید تا بادکنک‌های سفید؛ داستان توهم مبارزه!

2 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC≈1,110 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

رفیق تدینوف به رفیق وُزنِسِنسکی در جلسه‌ی گسپلن: مردم پول‌شون رو طبق سلسله‌مراتب ضروریات خرج می‌کنند، هیچ‌کس، تأکید می‌کنم هیچ‌کس، اول ماه نمیره گوشی عوض کنه. همه اول میرند سراغ شکم، پس ما بیایم شکم‌شون رو سیر کنیم. گوشی و سفر استانبول مهم نیست. من این برنامه رو براساس دانش عمیقم تدوین کردم. رفیق وزنسنسکی: ایول رفیق! کاش امثال تو رو بیشتر داشتیم. تصویب شد.

29 Jul 2026, 18:45 UTC≈1,810 viewsread 12 August 2026

وقتی در برابر یک ارتش منظّم و منضبط، دهقانان بی‌مهارت و غیرمسلّح قرار گیرند، چه شانسی برای حفظ آزادی وجود دارد؟ بگذارید به صفحات تاریخ برگردم تا شما را از خطر فعلی‌تان آگاه کنم. تاریخ اکثر ملل جهان را به یاد بیاورید. چه ویرانی‌ها و خرابی‌هایی توسّط ارتش‌های دائمی رقم خورده است؟ نمونه‌ای که هنوز در حافظه‌ی برخی اعضای این مجلس هست به ما نشان می‌دهد که چگونه می‌توان مردم مسلّح ما را نابود کرد. چهل سال پیش، هنگامی‌که قطع

29 Jul 2026, 13:50 UTC≈1,450 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

«مرداد مَه است سخت خرّم مِی نوش پیاپی و دمادم» (مسعود سعد) ـ᪥ـ جشن امردادگان فرخنده باد! ➣ @Notes_On_Liberty

28 Jul 2026, 09:37 UTC≈1,570 viewsread 12 August 2026

دست خالی جلوی گلوله رفتن نه شجاعت است، نه درایت، نه عقلانیت، نه حماسه‌سازی، نه نتیجه‌بخش. #بدیهیات

27 Jul 2026, 14:30 UTC≈1,460 viewsread 12 August 2026

جنگ‌ها، آماده‌سازی پیش از آن‌ها و پیامدهایشان، همگی به برقراری «دولت تمامیّت‌خواه» میانجامند؛ یعنی به سوی گسترش سیطره‌ی حکومت و افزایش روزافزون مسائل و مشکلات کلان. ولی تنها کسانی‌که قادرند فراتر از ظواهر را ببینند، درمی‌یابند که وقتی مردمان در چارچوب یک تشکیلات قدرت‌محور -سوسیالیسم، اقتدارگرایی، دولت رفاه یا اقتصاد دستوری- گرد هم می‌آیند و به‌اصطلاح «کلان‌محور» می‌شوند، وقوع جنگ ممکن، و در واقع بسیار محتمل می‌گردد.

26 Jul 2026, 13:30 UTC≈2,960 viewsread 12 August 2026

همه چیز در معرض زوال و دگرگونی است. زمانی‌که یک دولت، پس از جان سالم به در بردن از خطرات بزرگ و متعدّد، دارای قدرت عظیم و حاکمیّت کامل و بی‌چون‌وچرا می‌شود، بی‌گمان تداوم طولانی رفاه به ظهور سبک زندگی پرهزینه و تجمّل‌گرایانه میانجامد و ذهن مردمان درگیر رقابت‌های جاه‌طلبانه شده و شدیداً مشتاق و حریص دستیابی به مقام و قدرت می‌شوند. با فزونی‌گرفتنِ این مفاسد، میل به قدرت و حکم‌راندن بر مردم نخستین گام‌ها را برای ویرانی

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @Notes_On_Liberty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 492,711 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“On Liberty | درباره‌ی آزادی” (@Notes_On_Liberty), 6,571 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Notes_On_Liberty.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.