Channel
@NotesOnLooking
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
427subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003171600385 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NotesOnLooking |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NotesOnLooking |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 427 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:19 | 428 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 428 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (17 June 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 17,162 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
در نقاشان بزرگ گذشته، شخص پیش از دیدن تابلو بهعنوان نقاشی، آنچه را در آن است میبیند. حال آنکه تابلوی مدرنیستی را از اول بهعنوان نقاشی میبیند —که این البته بهترین طریقهی دیدن هر قسم تابلویی است— ولی مدرنیسم آن را بهعنوان یگانه طریقه و طریقهی ضروری دیدن به گردن بیننده میگذارد و موفقیتش در این کار به معنای توفیق در نقادی از خویش است. — از «مدرنسیم در نقاشی»، کلمنت گرینبرگ *L’Omnibus, by Pierre Bonnard, 1895. …
شما هم دعوتید تا دور هم بنشینیم، فیلم ببینیم و گفتوگو کنیم. نشست سوم زیر پوست راوی پخش مستند One More Time with Feeling کارگردان: Andrew Dominik پنجشنبه، ۱۵ مرداد ساعت ۱۸ محدودهی خیابان ولیعصر ظرفیت محدود رزرو صندلی
این بلیت رو بردار! شما هم دعوتید تا دور هم بنشینیم، فیلم ببینیم و گفتوگو کنیم. نشست سوم زیر پوست راوی: جهان اصلاً جایی ندارد پخش مستند One More Time with Feeling کارگردان: Andrew Dominik در این نشست، مستند One More Time with Feeling رو میبینیم، روایتی از زندگی نیک کیو در آستانهی انتشار آلبوم Skeleton Tree و مواجهه با سوگ از دست دادن فرزندش. میپرسیم: چطور بعد از یک فاجعه زبان ترانهنویسی و جهان فکری یک هنرمند …
شیوههای دیدن چرا به وجود آمد؟ در اینستاگرام شیوههای دیدن بخوانید: https://www.instagram.com/p/DaaiMyNDiub/?igsh=YnVibWZkbGZra216
آیا هنر به پایان رسیده است؟ برای قرنها، وظیفهی نقاشها بازنمایی عینبهعین جهان بیرون بود. اما نقاشی مدرن، در تلاش برای رسیدن به خلوص، وابستگیاش به جهان بیرون را نفی میکند و به خود برمیگردد: به زبان و تاریخ نقاشی، به رنگ و فرم و بوم تخت. آیا نقاشی در تلاش برای یافتن خالصترین فرم خودش تمام ظرفیتهایش را مصرف کرده و به پایان رسیده؟ 📃 باهم میخوانیم: مقالهی «مدرنیسم در نقاشی» از کلمنت گرینبرگ • در این سرینشس…
این سکانس هری پاتر رو یادتون میآد؟ موقعی که هری و هرماینی دارن به رادیو گوش میدن و رادیو اسامی کسانی رو که در اون روز کشته شدن اعلام میکنه، ترانهی O Children از نیک کیو پخش میشه و این دو بلند میشن باهم میرقصن. نیک کیو این ترانه رو برای تمام بچههایی نوشته که پا به دنیایی گذاشتن که خودشون هیچ نقشی در ساختنش نداشتن، و حالا محکومان که امیدوار باشن و زندگی کنن. ◽️در نشست دوم زیر پوست راوی، به تحلیل ترانهی O …
از جلسهی اول زیر پوست راوی پنجشنبهها | ساعت ۱۸ آنلاین و حضوری در جلسهی اول دربارهی فرق بین ترانه و شعر صحبت کردیم، ترانهی White Elephant رو تحلیل کردیم و در آخر یک اجرای زنده از نیک کیو دیدیم. شرکت در دورهی زیر پوست راوی
Breeze, by Philip Guston, 1967.
زیر پوست راوی | با آرمین فرمانی جلسهی اول: پنجشنبه، ۱ مرداد ساعت ۱۸ آنلاین و حضوری شرکت در جلسهی اول بهصورت رایگان
ما رو از امروز در سطح شهر پیدا میکنید. 🏙️
«همهی ما موجوداتی شکلگرفته از فقدان هستیم. […] فقدان همان چیزی است که ما را به هم پیوند میدهد.» تلخترین اتفاق زندگی نیک کیو هنگامی رخ داد که آلبوم «درخت بیبرگ» درحال ضبط بود: مرگ ناگهانی پسر پانزدهسالهاش، آرتور، بر اثر سقوط از ارتفاع. نیک کیو تا قبل از مرگ پسرش سعی میکرد ازطریق داستانها و ترانههایی که مینوشت جهان را بفهمد. اما وقتی جهان فرومیپاشد و از ریشه تغییر میکند، هنوز میتوانیم داستانهایی برای …
«من چجور آدمی هستم که توی خانه مینشینم، اخبار جنگ و خشونت را میخوانم، از همهچیز خشمگین میشوم، بعد میروم آتلیه که فقط قرمز را با آبی ترکیب کنم؟» — فیلیپ گاستون، در مصاحبهای با مارک استیونز فیلیپ گاستون، روبن کادیش و جولز لانگسنر در مقابل دیوارنگارهی «مبارزه علیه تروریسم»، حدود سال ۱۹۳۴ شرکت در جلسهی فیلیپ گاستون: آیرونی و بحران
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @NotesOnLooking. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 598,109 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شیوههای دیدن” (@NotesOnLooking), 427 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NotesOnLooking.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.